Outbound Sequence

When to use

Invoke this orchestrator when:

• A rep is preparing to open a net-new account and wants a research-backed sequence ready for review before anything goes out.
• A target account was added to the quarter's top-20 list and needs a full outbound package.
• A triggering signal fired (new exec hire, funding round, tech-stack change) and the team wants a ready-to-ship sequence personalized to that trigger.
• Sales ops is batch-preparing sequences for an upcoming outbound sprint.

Do not use for warm inbound replies (use a lighter follow-up skill), for existing customers (use account-expansion), or when the rep only needs one of the sub-artifacts — call that skill directly.

Chained skills

Four skills run in a fixed order. Research feeds everything downstream, so it must run first. Competitive analysis is conditional on an incumbent being detected.

1. lead-research — produces a one-page brief: firmographics, tech stack, trigger events, outreach angles, ICP fit score.
2. competitive-analysis — only invoked if research names an incumbent vendor; pulls or writes the battlecard.
3. email-outreach — drafts a 3-touch cold sequence (cold, follow-up, breakup) that cites specific triggers and angles from the brief.
4. meeting-prep — drafts a discovery-call brief assuming the prospect replies: attendees, likely priorities, talking points, landmines, objection handling.

Inputs

• account_name — canonical company name (e.g. Acme Retail, Nimbus Logistics). Used for filenames; slugified to acme-retail.
• rep_persona — the target buyer persona (e.g. platform engineering leader, VP of Data, CIO). Drives tone and angle selection.
• product_positioning (optional) — one-liner on which of our products to lead with. Defaults to the persona's usual fit.
• rep_name and rep_title — used to sign the emails.
• analyst_notes (optional) — anything the rep already knows that should be respected (e.g. "already met the CTO at re:Invent"). Merged into the research brief.

Outputs

• sales/sequences/-outbound.md — primary bundled artifact (research brief + optional battlecard + 3 emails + meeting prep).
• sales/research/.md — standalone research brief (shared output of lead-research).
• sales/battlecards/.md — only if competitive analysis runs; may already exist and be reused.

Tool dependencies

• Read access to enrichment sources configured for lead-research (e.g. Clearbit, LinkedIn, company website, recent press).
• Read access to the existing battlecard library under sales/battlecards/.
• Write access to sales/research/, sales/battlecards/, and sales/sequences/.
• The rep's approved product messaging — typically under sales/messaging/ — for email-outreach grounding.

Procedure

1. Normalize inputs. Slugify account_name to kebab-case. Verify the output paths do not already exist — if they do, append a date suffix rather than overwriting, and note it in the bundle header.

1. Run lead-research. Produce sales/research/.md containing:

• Firmographics: HQ, headcount band, revenue band, industry, ownership.
• Tech stack: confirmed tools (from BuiltWith, job posts, GitHub orgs, engineering blog) with confidence ratings.
• Trigger events: last 90 days of news, hires, funding, product launches. Each with a dated source link.
• Outreach angles: three angles ranked, each tied to a trigger and to a product capability.
• ICP fit score: 1-5 with reasoning.
• Incumbent detection: if a competing vendor is inferable, list it with the evidence.

1. Conditional competitive analysis. If the brief names an incumbent:

• Check sales/battlecards/.md. If present and updated within 90 days, reuse it.
• Otherwise invoke competitive-analysis to produce or refresh the battlecard: positioning, our wins, their wins, migration concerns, proof points.

1. Run email-outreach. Generate a 3-touch cold sequence grounded in the research:

• Touch 1 (cold). Subject line under 50 chars, body under 90 words. Opens on a specific trigger event. One CTA (15-minute call). No pitch slab.
• Touch 2 (follow-up, +3 business days). Different angle from Touch 1. Adds one proof point — customer in same segment, metric, or analyst mention. Still short.
• Touch 3 (breakup, +7 business days). Permission-to-close tone. One sentence. Clean exit.
• If a battlecard is present, Touch 2 or Touch 3 may reference a specific incumbent weakness without naming the competitor directly.

1. Run meeting-prep. Assume the prospect replies yes. Produce:

• Likely attendees and their LinkedIn-inferred priorities.
• Top three discovery questions tailored to the account's stack and triggers.
• Talking points tied to the two highest-ranked angles from the research.
• Landmines: known objections, political sensitivities, procurement quirks.
• Suggested next step if the call goes well (technical deep-dive, POC scoping, etc.).

1. Assemble the bundle. Write sales/sequences/-outbound.md with these sections in order: header (account, persona, rep, date), research brief (full inlined), battlecard (inlined if applicable), email sequence (Touch 1, 2, 3 with send-day offsets), meeting prep, and a final "rep review checklist" (facts to verify, any dubious claims flagged).

1. Return the bundle path plus a one-line summary the rep can paste into CRM activity notes.

Examples

Example 1 — greenfield prospect, no incumbent

Inputs: account_name=Acme Retail, rep_persona=platform engineering leader, rep_name=Jordan Vega.

Flow:

• lead-research produces sales/research/acme-retail.md: $50M ARR, ~180 employees, Shopify Plus on AWS (EKS + RDS Postgres), marketing on Klaviyo. Triggers: new VP Engineering (ex-Stripe, joined 38 days ago); Snowflake adoption announced on their engineering blog 11 days ago. ICP fit 4/5. No incumbent detected for our category.
• Competitive analysis skipped.
• email-outreach drafts three touches. Touch 1 subject: "Snowflake + Shopify Plus — what Stripe's playbook looked like". Body cites the VP Eng's prior Stripe role and the analytics-latency angle.
• meeting-prep briefs Jordan for a likely call with the VP Eng: priorities around data warehousing cost, concerns about schema drift from Shopify webhooks, talking points reference "cut analytics latency 68% at a comparable apparel retailer on Shopify Plus + Snowflake".
• Bundle sales/sequences/acme-retail-outbound.md produced. Rep review checklist flags one dubious claim ("Snowflake latency improvement figure — verify case study is still public").

Example 2 — competitive displacement

Inputs: account_name=Nimbus Logistics, rep_persona=CIO, rep_name=Priya Okafor.

Flow:

• lead-research produces sales/research/nimbus-logistics.md: $220M revenue, 3PL operator, ~900 employees. Trigger: new CIO (ex-Flexport, joined 22 days ago); hiring three SREs. Tech stack names Project44 for shipment visibility (confirmed via job post mentioning Project44 integration ownership) — flagged as incumbent. ICP fit 5/5.
• Existing battlecard sales/battlecards/project44.md is 40 days old — reused. If missing or stale, competitive-analysis would regenerate it; this time it is reused.
• email-outreach drafts three touches. Touch 1 hooks on the new CIO's Flexport background and the SRE hiring spree. Touch 2 references the Project44 weakness around last-mile visibility at carrier-change without naming the vendor. Touch 3 is a two-line breakup.
• meeting-prep includes a dedicated objection-handling section for Project44 migration concerns (data historical retention, EDI integration re-cert, contract co-term options).
• Bundle sales/sequences/nimbus-logistics-outbound.md produced with the Project44 battlecard inlined in a collapsible section.

Constraints

• This skill drafts only. It never sends email, never creates CRM records, never syncs with an outbound sequencer. Output is markdown on disk for rep review.
• Emails must be under 90 words (Touch 1 and 2) and under 30 words (Touch 3). Subject lines under 50 characters.
• Every claim about the prospect must trace back to a source link in the research brief. Unsourced claims are marked [unverified] and surfaced in the rep review checklist.
• No fabricated customer references. If email-outreach wants to cite a reference customer, it must come from sales/messaging/reference-customers.md or be left as [REFERENCE TBD] for the rep to fill in.
• Do not include PII beyond what is publicly visible (LinkedIn title, company bio, public statements).
• Competitive battlecards must not name-and-shame in email copy. Reference weaknesses by capability, not by vendor name, unless the rep explicitly overrides.
• Respect the chain order. Skipping research to save time violates the contract of this skill.

Quality checks

Before returning, verify:

• The bundle file exists at sales/sequences/-outbound.md and contains all required sections (header, research, optional battlecard, three emails, meeting prep, rep review checklist).
• The three emails are present, labeled Touch 1 / 2 / 3, with word-count and character-count meta lines under each subject line.
• Every outreach angle in the emails maps to a specific trigger or stack item in the research brief — no floating claims.
• If an incumbent was named, a battlecard is either referenced or inlined. If no incumbent, the battlecard section is omitted cleanly (no empty heading).
• ICP fit score and at least three trigger events are present in the research brief.
• The rep review checklist lists every [unverified] claim and every [REFERENCE TBD] placeholder.
• The rep's name and title appear exactly as passed in, with no typos. Signature block is consistent across all three emails.
• No send action occurred. The final line of the bundle reads "Status: draft — not sent."

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

• Author: tahirraufkeeyu
• Source: tahirraufkeeyu/software-development-agent-stack--sdas
• License: MIT

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.