AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified CC0-1.0 Self-run

Search

skill-taishi-i-awesome-chatgpt-repositories-search · by taishi-i

Search 2500+ curated ChatGPT and LLM open-source repositories. Use when the user asks to find tools, libraries, or repos related to ChatGPT, LLMs, RAG, agents, langchain, NLP, AI development, or any open-source AI tooling.

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-taishi-i-awesome-chatgpt-repositories-search

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-taishi-i-awesome-chatgpt-repositories-search)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Search? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Search the awesome-ChatGPT-repositories database for: "$ARGUMENTS"

Instructions

Step 1 — Interpret the query

The user's query is: "$ARGUMENTS"

Supported query modifiers:

  • category: — filter to one category
  • language: — filter by programming language
  • list categories or categories — skip to Step 5b
  • Plain text — keyword search across all categories

The descriptions are in English, so convert non-English queries to English keywords before searching.

Examples: | User query | English keywords to search | |------------|---------------------------| | RAGを使ったチャットボット | RAG, retrieval, chatbot, vector | | 코드 생성 도구 (Korean) | code generation, copilot, autocomplete | | 中文问答系统 | chinese, QA, question answering | | outil de résumé (French) | summarization, summary, text | | LLMを使ったエージェント | agent, autonomous, LLM, tool use |

Keyword tips:

  • Use stems, not full words. Substring match catches variants: embed → embedding/embeddings, retriev → retrieval/retrieve, classif → classification/classifier, generat → generation/generative, fine-tun → fine-tune/fine-tuning, summari → summarize/summarization, orchestrat → orchestrate/orchestration.
  • Add domain-specific names. For common LLM/AI domains, include well-known tool or framework names present in the database:

| Domain (query hint) | Stem keywords | Tool/library names to add | |---|---|---| | RAG / 検索拡張生成 | retriev, rag, embed, vector | langchain, llamaindex, haystack, faiss, chroma, pinecone | | Agent / エージェント | agent, autonom, orchestrat | autogpt, langchain, langgraph, crewai | | Fine-tuning / ファインチューニング | fine-tun, lora, peft, finetun | lora, peft, qlora | | Code generation / コード生成 | code, coding, copilot, autocomplet | copilot, codex, interpreter | | Chatbot / チャットボット | chat, bot, dialog, convers | discord, telegram, slack | | Prompt engineering | prompt, few-shot, chain-of-thought, jailbreak | promptflow, dspy | | Evaluation / 評価 | evaluat, benchmark, metric | evals, lm-eval, deepeval | | Image / 画像生成 | image, vision, multimodal | dall-e, stable-diffusion, midjourney | | Voice / 音声 | voice, speech, audio, tts, asr | whisper, eleven |

  • Aim for 3–6 keywords. Too few miss items; too many inflate low-quality partial matches.

Step 2 — Search the data files with grep

Data is split into per-category files. Each file is a JSON array with one repo record per line, so you can grep for matches instead of reading whole files — this keeps token use low (a typical query pulls in a few dozen matching lines instead of hundreds of KB). Fields per record:

  • u: GitHub URL · n: repository name · d: English description
  • c: category · l: language (optional) · t: topics comma-separated (optional)
  • sc: quality score 0–8 · st: star count (optional) · ns: normalized star score 0–10 (optional)

File list (all under data/ relative to this plugin; six categories over ~200 entries are split a/b):

| Category | File(s) | |----------|---------| | Awesome-lists | repos-awesome-lists.json | | Prompts | repos-prompts.json | | Chatbots | repos-chatbots-a.json, repos-chatbots-b.json | | Browser-extensions | repos-browser-extensions-a.json, repos-browser-extensions-b.json | | CLIs | repos-clis-a.json, repos-clis-b.json | | Reimplementations | repos-reimplementations.json | | Tutorials | repos-tutorials.json | | NLP | repos-nlp-a.json, repos-nlp-b.json | | Langchain | repos-langchain.json | | Unity | repos-unity.json | | Openai | repos-openai-a.json, repos-openai-b.json | | Others | repos-others-a.json, repos-others-b.json |

Which files to search — pick the minimum set that covers the query, then grep them (below):

Rule A — category: specified: grep only that category's file(s), skip routing below. Match the category name case-insensitively and accept common variants: cli/clis/command-line → CLIs · chatbot/bot/chatbots → Chatbots · browser/extension/browser-extension → Browser-extensions · prompt/prompts → Prompts · tutorial/tutorials → Tutorials · reimpl/reimplementation → Reimplementations · awesome/lists → Awesome-lists · open ai/openai → Openai. If the value matches no category, fall back to keyword routing (Rule C).

Rule B — list categories: skip all file reads, jump to Step 5b.

Rule C — keyword routing for general queries:

Use the English keywords from Step 1 (not the original query text) for routing. For each row below, check if any English keyword contains or matches the listed terms (case-insensitive substring). Use that row's file(s) only if there is a match. If multiple rows match, collect all their files (deduplicated). If no rows match, use the default: repos-chatbots-a.json, repos-nlp-a.json, repos-openai-a.json, repos-others-a.json.

| If query mentions… | Search these files | |--------------------|-----------------| | chatbot, bot, chat, dialog, conversation, assistant, discord, slack | repos-chatbots-a.json, repos-chatbots-b.json | | RAG, retrieval, vector, embed, semantic, FAISS, Chroma, Pinecone, similarity, index | repos-nlp-a.json, repos-nlp-b.json, repos-langchain.json | | NLP, text, classify, classification, NER, POS, sentiment, translation, extraction, summariz | repos-nlp-a.json, repos-nlp-b.json | | agent, agentic, workflow, autonomous, orchestrat, tool use, function call, multi-agent | repos-others-a.json, repos-others-b.json, repos-langchain.json | | OpenAI, GPT-3, GPT-4, gpt4, gpt3, completion, fine-tun, API key, endpoint | repos-openai-a.json, repos-openai-b.json | | browser, extension, Chrome, Firefox, sidebar, popup, Tampermonkey | repos-browser-extensions-a.json, repos-browser-extensions-b.json | | CLI, terminal, shell, command-line, command line | repos-clis-a.json, repos-clis-b.json | | tutorial, learn, course, beginner, guide, example, cookbook, sample | repos-tutorials.json | | prompt, prompting, few-shot, chain-of-thought, jailbreak, injection | repos-prompts.json | | Unity, game engine, 3D, game development | repos-unity.json | | LangChain, LlamaIndex, Haystack, chain, index, LangGraph | repos-langchain.json | | lora, peft, qlora, finetun, fine-tuning, quantiz | repos-reimplementations.json, repos-nlp-a.json, repos-openai-a.json | | evaluat, benchmark, metric, assess, leaderboard | repos-nlp-a.json, repos-nlp-b.json, repos-others-a.json | | reimplement, from scratch, reproduce, train, training, PyTorch | repos-reimplementations.json | | awesome list, curated, collection, survey, compilation | repos-awesome-lists.json | | code, coding, IDE, VS Code, copilot, autocomplete, interpreter | repos-others-a.json, repos-others-b.json, repos-clis-a.json | | image, vision, multimodal, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, drawing | repos-others-a.json, repos-nlp-a.json | | voice, speech, audio, TTS, ASR, Whisper | repos-others-a.json, repos-nlp-b.json |

Then grep those files for the keywords — do NOT open whole files with the Read tool. Locate the data directory once:

DATA="$(find "${HOME}/.claude/plugins" "${PWD}" -type d -name data -path "*awesome-chatgpt-search*" 2>/dev/null | head -1)"

Then grep the selected files for your Step 1 keywords and cap the output. Use -F (literal substring match — same semantics as the scoring step, and safe for keywords like c++ or .net) with one -e per keyword:

grep -ihF -e keyword1 -e keyword2 -e keyword3 "$DATA"/repos-nlp-a.json "$DATA"/repos-nlp-b.json | head -120

Each line of output is one repo record (a JSON object) that matched at least one keyword — score those lines directly in Step 4. This reads only the matching repos, not the whole files. Notes:

  • If grep returns fewer than ~8 lines, broaden the keywords (add stems/tool names from Step 1) and re-run.
  • If it returns the full head cap, your keywords are good; proceed.
  • Only fall back to the Read tool on individual files if grep is unavailable.

Step 3 — Filter by language (if language: was given)

Append a language filter to the grep pipeline (the l field holds the language, matched case-insensitively):

grep -ihF -e keyword1 -e keyword2 "$DATA"/repos-clis-a.json "$DATA"/repos-clis-b.json | grep -iF '"l":""' | head -120

Step 4 — Score candidates

Using the English keywords from Step 1, compute a relevance score for each repo record returned by grep:

Text match score (case-insensitive, per keyword):

  • Name (n) exact keyword match: +20 pts
  • Name (n) contains keyword: +10 pts
  • Description (d) contains keyword: +5 pts
  • Topics (t) contains keyword: +3 pts
  • Category (c) contains keyword: +2 pts

Popularity bonus (added once per item):

  • If ns (normalized star score) is present: min(4, ns * 0.4)
  • Otherwise: min(4, sc * 0.5)

Quality bonus (always added): min(2, sc * 0.25)

Combined score = textmatch + popularitybonus + quality_bonus

Exclude items with text_match < 5 (catches only accidental partial hits). Collect top 20 candidates by combined score.

Step 5a — Re-rank with your judgment

Apply semantic judgment to produce the final ordered list of up to 10 results.

Re-rank by evaluating each candidate on:

  1. Semantic centrality — how directly does this repo address the query's core intent?
  2. Quality signal — higher sc means a richer, better-documented project.
  3. Category fit — match the repo type to the implied need:
  • "build a chatbot / ボット" → prefer Chatbots, CLIs
  • "learn / tutorial / 勉強" → prefer Tutorials
  • "prompt engineering" → prefer Prompts
  • "use from browser" → prefer Browser-extensions
  • "NLP task" → prefer NLP, Langchain
  • "OpenAI API" → prefer Openai
  1. Specificity — a repo specialized for the exact use-case beats a general one.
  2. Language fit — if the user implied a language, prefer repos with matching l.

Step 5b — List categories (only if query was list categories / categories)

Skip scoring. Present:

## Available categories

| Category | Count |
|----------|-------|
| Awesome-lists | 96 |
| Prompts | 184 |
| Chatbots | 379 |
| Browser-extensions | 252 |
| CLIs | 240 |
| Reimplementations | 42 |
| Tutorials | 21 |
| NLP | 412 |
| Langchain | 178 |
| Unity | 17 |
| Openai | 325 |
| Others | 461 |
| **Total** | **2,607** |

Step 6 — Format the output

## Search results for "$ARGUMENTS"

*(Searched for: keyword1, keyword2, ...)*

Found N result(s).

### 1. [repository-name](url)
**Category:** category  ·  **Language:** language  ·  ⭐ {st} stars
Description text here.
*Topics: tag1, tag2, tag3*

### 2. ...

Omit the Language line if l is absent. Omit ⭐ stars if st is absent. Omit the Topics line if t is absent.

If no results found, suggest alternate keywords and link to: https://github.com/taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories

Step 7 — Output use-case selection guide

After the search results list, append a guide table to help users pick the right repo for their specific situation.

Match the section heading and table language to the query language — if the query was in Japanese, use Japanese for the heading and column headers; otherwise use English.

## Use-case Selection Guide

| Use case | Recommended | Score | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| ... | [name](url) | sc=N | short reason |

Rules:

  • List 3–6 distinct use cases derived from the top 10 results. Each row should represent a meaningfully different scenario (e.g., "deploy a self-hosted chatbot" vs. "build a RAG pipeline"), not just a restatement of the query.
  • For each row, select the single best repo from the top 10 results.
  • Score column: show sc=N using the item's quality score.
  • Why: write a 10–15 word reason in the query language explaining the practical benefit. Do not copy the description verbatim.
  • If two use cases map to the same repo, merge them into one row or drop the weaker one.
  • If there are fewer than 3 meaningfully distinct use cases in the results, output as many rows as make sense (minimum 1).

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.