Install
$ agentstack add skill-tajd-economist-style-guide-plugin-economist-style ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
The Economist Style Guide
Apply these principles to all written content, including markdown files, HTML, code documentation, and technical writing.
Core Principles
- Clarity first: Use short words, active voice, and concrete examples
- Precision: Replace vague quantifiers with specific numbers and facts
- Brevity: Choose concise over verbose expressions
- Dialect awareness: Match the document's existing spelling and conventions (British, American, etc.)
Orwell's Six Elementary Rules
The guide's introduction rests on George Orwell's six rules (from "Politics and the English Language", 1946): clarity of thought first, then say it as simply as possible.
- Never use a metaphor, simile or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print
- Never use a long word where a short one will do
- If it is possible to cut out a word, always cut it out
- Never use the passive where you can use the active
- Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent
- Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous
Tone: The "Do Nots"
In the spirit of the guide's introduction:
- Do not be stuffy: Use everyday speech, not the language of lawyers or bureaucrats
- Do not be hectoring or arrogant: Those who disagree are not necessarily stupid; persuade with evidence, not assertion
- Do not be too pleased with yourself: Let analysis speak; avoid self-congratulation
- Do not be too chatty: Maintain professional distance
- Do not be too didactic: Guide, don't lecture
- Get straight in and be lucid: No throat-clearing openings; edit ruthlessly; cut anything superfluous
Analysis Workflow
When reviewing text, follow this sequence:
0. Load the Signature Rules
Read reference/ECONOMIST-SIGNATURE.md first — a one-page distillation of the rules that make copy recognizably Economist (numbers, dates, commas, quotes, honorifics, headings). Most reviews need only this plus the quick checks below; load the detailed files only when a deeper check is warranted.
1. Detect Document Dialect
IMPORTANT: Before making any suggestions, detect the document's existing spelling dialect:
- Look for spellings like "colour" vs "color", "organise" vs "organize"
- Check date formats (1st January vs January 1st)
- Observe punctuation style (single vs double quotes)
- Match the document's existing conventions - do not impose a dialect
2. Structural Review
- Check for buried ledes (main point should come first)
- Verify logical flow and argument structure
- Ensure each paragraph has a clear purpose
3. Clarity Analysis
For detailed passive voice and clarity rules, read reference/CLARITY.md
Quick checks:
- Flag passive voice constructions
- Identify jargon and suggest plain alternatives
- Find unnecessarily complex words
- Detect hedge words that weaken statements
4. Precision Check
For detailed precision rules, read reference/PRECISION.md
Quick checks:
- Identify vague quantifiers ("many", "often", "significant")
- Flag weasel words and empty fillers
- Flag clichés and dead metaphors ("game-changer", "perfect storm")
- Suggest specific numbers or evidence
- Remove redundant phrases
5. Dialect Conventions (if applicable)
Only if the user explicitly requests dialect checking, or if there are inconsistencies within the document, read reference/DIALECT-CONVENTIONS.md
6. Common Errors
For frequently encountered mistakes, read reference/COMMON-ERRORS.md
7. Punctuation Check
For detailed punctuation rules (commas, semicolons, dashes, quotation marks), read reference/PUNCTUATION.md
Quick checks:
- Verify comma usage (serial comma, restrictive clauses)
- Check dash and hyphen usage
- Ensure consistent quotation mark style
8. Numbers and Figures
For number formatting guidelines, read reference/NUMBERS.md
Quick checks:
- Spell out numbers one to ten, use numerals from 11
- Verify percentage formatting (% symbol, percentage points vs percentages)
- Check date and currency formatting
9. Structure Review
For document organisation guidelines, read reference/STRUCTURE.md
Quick checks:
- Each paragraph has a clear topic sentence
- Lead/opening hooks the reader
- Logical flow from paragraph to paragraph
- Conclusion adds value (not just summary)
10. Tone Assessment
For voice and register guidance, read reference/TONE.md
Quick checks:
- Authoritative but not arrogant
- Avoid excessive adjectives and intensifiers
- Neutral language on contested issues
- No preaching or lecturing
- People: full name on first mention, honorific + surname after ("Ms Yellen")
11. Abbreviations (on-demand)
If the document contains abbreviations or acronyms, read reference/ABBREVIATIONS.md
12. Capitalisation (on-demand)
If there are capitalisation questions (titles, institutions, geographic terms), read reference/CAPITALIZATION.md
13. Special Contexts (on-demand)
For quotations, foreign words, lists, or tables, read reference/SPECIAL-CONTEXTS.md
14. Word Usage (on-demand)
For rulings on commonly misused words (aggravate, decimate, refute, unique...), read reference/WORDS.md
Output Format
When providing feedback:
- List issues by category (clarity, precision, dialect consistency if applicable)
- Provide line/paragraph references
- Show original text and suggested replacement
- Explain the reasoning briefly
Example:
**Clarity Issue** (Para 2, Line 3)
Original: "The data was analysed by the research team"
Suggested: "The research team analysed the data"
Reason: Active voice is clearer and more direct
When Not to Apply
- Direct quotations (preserve original wording)
- Code examples (unless in comments/documentation)
- Technical terms with no plain alternative
- Proper nouns and brand names
- Established dialect/spelling patterns (match what's already there)
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: TAJD
- Source: TAJD/economist-style-guide-plugin
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://tom-dickson.com/blog/teaching-claude-economist-style/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.