Install
$ agentstack add skill-takusaotome-claude-skills-library-executive-briefing-writer ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Executive Briefing Writer
A specialized skill for creating high-impact executive communications that drive decisions and save leadership time.
Overview
This skill helps create:
- One-page executive summaries
- Board of Directors reports
- Management meeting materials
- Investor briefing documents
Core Framework: So What? / Why Now? / What Next?
Key Principles:
- Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF)
- 30-second rule (key message visible immediately)
- Decision-oriented structure
- Data visualization for impact
When to Use
- Creating materials for C-suite, board, or investors
- Summarizing complex information for decision-makers
- Preparing approval requests or investment proposals
- Communicating strategic initiatives or operational updates
Prerequisites
- Input Content: Raw data, analysis results, or information to be communicated to executives
- Audience Knowledge: Understanding of who will receive the document (CEO, Board, investors, etc.)
- Decision Context: Clarity on what decision or action is being requested (if applicable)
- Timeline: Awareness of relevant deadlines or urgency factors
Output
This skill generates executive briefing documents in Markdown format:
- One-page executive summaries
- Board of Directors reports
- Management meeting materials
- Investor briefing documents
Documents are created using templates from assets/ and follow the "So What? / Why Now? / What Next?" framework.
Resources
References (Load on-demand for guidance)
references/executive_communication_guide.md- Communication principles for executivesreferences/so_what_framework.md- The So What? / Why Now? / What Next? frameworkreferences/data_visualization_guidelines.md- Data visualization best practicesreferences/action_recommendation_patterns.md- Action recommendation patterns
Templates (Use for document generation)
assets/one_page_summary_template_[ja|en].md- One-page executive summaryassets/board_report_template_[ja|en].md- Board of Directors reportassets/management_meeting_template_[ja|en].md- Management meeting materialsassets/investor_briefing_template_[ja|en].md- Investor briefing document
Workflow 1: Purpose and Audience Definition
Purpose
Clarify what you're trying to achieve and who will receive the document. This determines structure, depth, and tone.
Step 1: Define the Document Purpose
Identify the primary objective:
| Purpose Type | Description | Key Focus | |--------------|-------------|-----------| | Decision Request | Seeking approval or choice between options | Options, risks, recommendation | | Status Report | Informing on progress or situation | Metrics, trends, deviations | | Proposal | Advocating for an initiative or investment | Business case, ROI, timeline | | Alert/Escalation | Raising awareness of risk or issue | Impact, urgency, mitigation |
Step 2: Identify the Audience
Understand your audience's perspective:
| Audience | Time Available | Primary Concerns | Preferred Format | |----------|----------------|------------------|------------------| | CEO | Very limited | Strategic impact, risks | One-page summary | | Board of Directors | Limited | Governance, compliance, returns | Formal report | | Executive Committee | Moderate | Cross-functional impact | Meeting materials | | Investors | Moderate | Returns, growth, risks | Structured briefing |
Step 3: Define Expected Outcome
Specify what should happen after reading:
After reviewing this document, the reader should:
1. Understand: [Key insight or situation]
2. Believe: [Core message or conclusion]
3. Do: [Specific action or decision]
Workflow 2: Apply the So What? Framework
Purpose
Structure your message using the "So What? / Why Now? / What Next?" framework to ensure relevance and actionability.
Step 1: So What? - Extract the Core Message
Ask yourself: "Why should the executive care about this?"
Good Example: > "Customer churn increased 15% this quarter, putting $2.3M ARR at risk."
Bad Example: > "Customer churn increased 15% this quarter." (No impact stated)
Checklist:
- [ ] Business impact is quantified (revenue, cost, risk, market share)
- [ ] Impact is relevant to audience's responsibilities
- [ ] Message is specific, not vague
Step 2: Why Now? - Establish Urgency
Ask yourself: "Why does this need attention now?"
Good Example: > "Q4 budget lock is in 2 weeks; delay means 6-month postponement."
Bad Example: > "We should address this soon." (No specific timeline)
Urgency Triggers:
- Deadline approaching (budget cycle, contract renewal, regulatory)
- Window of opportunity closing (market timing, competitive move)
- Risk accelerating (trend worsening, threshold approaching)
- Dependencies requiring early decision
Step 3: What Next? - Propose Clear Actions
Ask yourself: "What specific action do you want?"
Good Example: > "Approve $150K for customer success program; implementation starts Dec 1."
Bad Example: > "We recommend improving customer retention." (No specific action)
Action Format:
[ACTION VERB] + [SPECIFIC THING] + [BY WHEN/HOW MUCH]
Examples:
- Approve the $2M capital expenditure for new facility
- Decide between Option A (in-house) or Option B (outsource)
- Authorize hiring of 3 additional engineers
Workflow 3: Structure Design
Purpose
Organize information using the Pyramid Principle and design the document structure.
Step 1: Apply the Pyramid Principle
Structure information from conclusion to supporting evidence:
Level 1: Main Message (Answer/Conclusion)
|
Level 2: Key Supporting Points (3-5 maximum)
|
Level 3: Evidence/Data (Only as needed)
Before (Chronological - Wrong): > "We analyzed customer feedback, then reviewed churn data, conducted interviews, and concluded that..."
After (Pyramid - Correct): > "Recommendation: Invest $500K in customer success. This will reduce churn by 20% based on three findings: [1] Exit interviews reveal..., [2] Data shows..., [3] Competitor analysis indicates..."
Step 2: Design the One-Page Summary
Every executive document needs a scannable first page:
+--------------------------------------------+
| [TITLE] - [DATE] |
+--------------------------------------------+
| EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (3-5 sentences) |
| - Core message with So What? |
| - Why Now? |
| - What Next? (Recommendation) |
+--------------------------------------------+
| KEY METRICS | SITUATION |
| +---+ +---+ +---+ | Current state |
| |KPI| |KPI| |KPI| | Key developments |
| +---+ +---+ +---+ | |
+--------------------------------------------+
| RECOMMENDATION / NEXT STEPS |
| 1. Specific action item |
| 2. Timeline |
| 3. Required resources |
+--------------------------------------------+
Step 3: Determine Detail Pages
Based on audience and purpose, select additional sections:
| Section | When to Include | |---------|-----------------| | Background/Context | If audience lacks familiarity | | Analysis Details | If methodology matters for credibility | | Financial Breakdown | For investment decisions | | Risk Assessment | For high-stakes decisions | | Implementation Plan | For project approvals | | Appendix | For reference data |
Workflow 4: Data Visualization
Purpose
Present data in ways that support executive decision-making.
Step 1: Select Appropriate Chart Types
| Message Type | Recommended Chart | Avoid | |--------------|------------------|-------| | Trend over time | Line chart, Area chart | Pie chart | | Comparison | Bar chart (horizontal for many items) | 3D charts | | Composition | Stacked bar, Treemap | Multiple pie charts | | Distribution | Histogram, Box plot | Complex scatter | | Relationship | Scatter plot, Bubble chart | Over-decorated visuals |
Step 2: Apply Executive Visualization Principles
Rule 1: One Chart, One Message
- Each visualization should answer one question
- Include the insight in the title: "Revenue Up 23% YoY" not "Revenue Chart"
Rule 2: Maximize Data-Ink Ratio
- Remove gridlines, excessive labels, decorative elements
- Use color intentionally (highlight key data, gray for context)
Rule 3: Use Consistent Formatting
- Round numbers appropriately ($2.3M not $2,347,892)
- Use consistent units and scales
- Include context (vs. target, vs. prior period)
Step 3: Add Annotations for Insight
Highlight what matters:
- Circle or arrow pointing to key data points
- Brief annotation explaining significance
- Compare to benchmark or target
Revenue ($M)
^
3 -| .-----
Q1 Q2 Q3
Workflow 5: Action Recommendations
Purpose
Present recommendations in a way that facilitates executive decision-making.
Step 1: Structure Options Clearly
When presenting options, use consistent format:
| Criteria | Option A: Build | Option B: Buy | Option C: Partner | |----------|-----------------|---------------|-------------------| | Cost | $500K | $800K | $300K | | Timeline | 6 months | 2 months | 3 months | | Control | High | Medium | Low | | Risk | Technical risk | Vendor dependency | IP exposure | | Recommendation | | Preferred | |
Step 2: Highlight Risks and Trade-offs
Be explicit about what could go wrong:
Key Risks:
+------------------------------------------------------+
| Risk | Impact | Likelihood | Mitigation |
+-------------------+---------+------------+------------+
| Vendor delay | High | Medium | Milestone |
| | | | penalties |
| Cost overrun | Medium | Low | Fixed- |
| | | | price bid |
+------------------------------------------------------+
Step 3: Make the Ask Explicit
End with a clear request:
For Approval: > "Requesting approval to proceed with Option B at $800K budget. Authorization signature required below."
For Decision: > "Decision required by [date]: Select Option A, B, or C. If no decision by [date], project will be delayed by [impact]."
For Information: > "No action required. This report is for awareness. Questions can be directed to [contact]."
Workflow 6: Document Generation and Quality Check
Purpose
Generate the final document using templates and ensure executive-level quality.
Step 1: Select and Load Template
Choose appropriate template based on audience and purpose:
Purpose: Board Report -> assets/board_report_template_[ja|en].md
Purpose: Management Meeting -> assets/management_meeting_template_[ja|en].md
Purpose: Investor Briefing -> assets/investor_briefing_template_[ja|en].md
Purpose: General Summary -> assets/one_page_summary_template_[ja|en].md
Step 2: Populate Template
Fill in each section following the guidance in the template:
- Replace all placeholder text with actual content
- Ensure So What? / Why Now? / What Next? are addressed
- Verify all data visualizations follow guidelines
- Include specific recommendations and next steps
Step 3: Executive Quality Checklist
Before finalizing, verify:
Content Quality:
- [ ] Main message visible in first 30 seconds
- [ ] So What? is answered with business impact
- [ ] Why Now? establishes clear urgency
- [ ] What Next? specifies concrete action
- [ ] Data supports conclusions (no gaps in logic)
Format Quality:
- [ ] One-page summary scannable in 60 seconds
- [ ] Charts have insight in title
- [ ] Numbers are consistently formatted
- [ ] No jargon or unexplained acronyms
- [ ] Action items are specific and dated
Audience Alignment:
- [ ] Appropriate for audience's time constraints
- [ ] Addresses audience's likely questions
- [ ] Recommendation within audience's authority
- [ ] Risks and trade-offs acknowledged
Quick Reference
Template Selection Guide
| Audience | Document Type | Template | |----------|---------------|----------| | CEO/C-Suite | Quick update | onepagesummary | | Board of Directors | Formal proposal | boardreport | | Executive Committee | Working session | managementmeeting | | Investors/Analysts | Performance review | investor_briefing |
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Burying the lead - Put conclusion first, not last
- Data dump - Curate, don't overwhelm
- Vague recommendations - Be specific about action and timeline
- Missing the "so what" - Always connect to business impact
- Too much detail - Executives need summary, not comprehensive analysis
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: takusaotome
- Source: takusaotome/claude-skills-library
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://takusaotome.github.io/claude-skills-library/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.