AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Wwas

skill-tarunccet-pm-skills-wwas · by tarunccet

Create product backlog items in Why-What-Acceptance format — independent, valuable, testable items with strategic context. Use when writing structured backlog items, breaking features into work items, or using the WWA format.

No reviews yet
0 installs
32 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-tarunccet-pm-skills-wwas

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-tarunccet-pm-skills-wwas)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Wwas? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Why-What-Acceptance (WWA)

Create product backlog items in Why-What-Acceptance format. Produces independent, valuable, testable items with strategic context.

Use when: Writing backlog items, creating product increments, breaking features into work items, or communicating strategic intent to teams.

Arguments:

  • $PRODUCT: The product or system name
  • $FEATURE: The new feature or capability
  • $DESIGN: Link to design files (Figma, Miro, etc.)
  • $ASSUMPTIONS: Key assumptions and strategic context

Step-by-Step Process

Phase 0: Context Confirmation

Before proceeding, review what's been provided in $ARGUMENTS and the conversation context. Only ask about what's missing — don't re-ask what's already clear.

  1. Summarize what you understand from the provided context — restate the product, feature, or situation back to the user in 2-3 sentences.
  2. Identify gaps — if any of the following are unclear, ask:
  • What feature or initiative are these backlog items for?
  • What is the strategic context (why is this being worked on)?
  • Who are the key stakeholders or users?
  1. Confirm: "Here's my understanding: [summary]. I plan to [brief description of what the skill will produce]. Does this look right, or would you like to adjust anything before I proceed?"

If the user provides additional context, incorporate it. If the user confirms, proceed.

  1. Define the strategic Why - Connect work to business and team objectives
  2. Describe the What - Keep descriptions concise, reference designs
  3. Write Acceptance Criteria - High-level, not detailed specifications
  4. Ensure independence - Items can be developed in any order
  5. Keep items negotiable - Invite team conversation, not constraints
  6. Make items valuable - Each delivers measurable user or business value
  7. Ensure testability - Outcomes are observable and verifiable
  8. Size appropriately - Small enough for one sprint estimate

Item Template

Title: [What will be delivered]

Why: [1-2 sentences connecting to strategic context and team objectives]

What: [Short description and design link. 1-2 paragraphs maximum. A reminder of discussion, not detailed specification.]

Acceptance Criteria:

  • [Observable outcome 1]
  • [Observable outcome 2]
  • [Observable outcome 3]
  • [Observable outcome 4]

Example WWA Item

Title: Implement Real-Time Spending Tracker

Why: Users need immediate feedback on spending to make conscious budget decisions. This directly supports our goal to improve financial awareness and reduce overspending.

What: Add a real-time spending tracker that updates as users log expenses. The tracker displays their current week's spending against their set budget. Designs available in [Figma link]. This is a reminder of our discussions - detailed specifications will emerge during development conversations with the team.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Spending totals update within 2 seconds of logging an expense
  • Budget progress is visually indicated with a progress bar
  • Users can see remaining budget amount at a glance
  • System handles multiple expense categories correctly

Output Deliverables

  • Complete set of backlog items for the feature
  • Each item includes Why, What, and Acceptance Criteria sections
  • Items are independent and deliverable in any order
  • Items are sized for estimation and completion in one sprint
  • Strategic context is clear for team decision-making
  • Design references are included for implementation guidance

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.