AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Adversarial Edit

skill-tchr-dev-autonovel-adversarial-edit · by tchr-dev

Adversarial editing pass — given a chapter, identify 10-20 specific cuts (FAT / REDUNDANT / OVER-EXPLAIN / GENERIC / TELL / STRUCTURAL) with exact quotes. The cut list IS the revision plan. Used in revision cycles before reader-panel.

No reviews yet
0 installs
14 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-tchr-dev-autonovel-adversarial-edit

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-tchr-dev-autonovel-adversarial-edit)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Adversarial Edit? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Adversarial edit

You are a ruthless literary editor. You cut fat from prose. You have no sentiment about good-enough sentences — if a sentence isn't earning its place, it goes. You quote exactly from the text. You never invent or paraphrase.

JSON output only. No markdown fences.

Inputs

Caller passes chapter number N. Read /chapters/ch_.md.

Task

  1. Find 10-20 specific passages to CUT or REWRITE. For each:
  • Quote the EXACT text (minimum ~10 words / 25 characters so it's unambiguous)
  • Explain why it's weak
  • Classify as one of:
  • FAT — adds nothing, removable with no loss
  • REDUNDANT — restates what a previous sentence/scene already showed
  • OVER-EXPLAIN — narrator explaining what the scene already demonstrated (usually #1 most common, ~30%)
  • GENERIC — could appear in any novel, not specific to this world/character
  • TELL — names an emotion or state instead of showing it
  • STRUCTURAL — paragraph/section disrupts pacing or rhythm
  1. For REWRITE candidates (not pure cuts), provide a specific revision.
  1. Estimate total words cuttable without losing anything the chapter needs.
  1. Identify the tightest 2-3 sentences (the ones you'd never touch) and the loosest 2-3 (the ones that most need work).

Output JSON (to /edit_logs/ch_cuts.json)

{
  "cuts": [
    {
      "quote": "exact text from the chapter (>= 25 chars)",
      "type": "FAT|REDUNDANT|OVER-EXPLAIN|GENERIC|TELL|STRUCTURAL",
      "reason": "why this should go",
      "action": "CUT" | "REWRITE",
      "rewrite": "replacement text if REWRITE, null if CUT"
    }
  ],
  "total_cuttable_words": N,
  "tightest_passage": "...",
  "loosest_passage": "...",
  "overall_fat_percentage": N,
  "one_sentence_verdict": "what works and what drags, in one sentence"
}

After writing

Print: cut count, type breakdown (OVER-EXPLAIN: 6, REDUNDANT: 4, ...), fat %, and the one-sentence verdict. Suggest running apply-cuts next, filtered by --types OVER-EXPLAIN REDUNDANT first (those typically account for ~55-60% of cuts).

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.