Install
$ agentstack add skill-techymt-claude-code-superpowers-tool-definition ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ● Environment & secrets Used
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Tool Definition
The pattern
A Tool is defined by calling buildTool({ ... }), which fills in safe defaults for isEnabled, isConcurrencySafe, isReadOnly, isDestructive, checkPermissions, and other housekeeping methods. The Input is a Zod schema exposed via a get inputSchema() getter. The Output is the TypeScript type of data inside the result. These compose: the Zod schema drives runtime validation AND TypeScript types simultaneously, eliminating a class of bugs where validation and types diverge.
The key insight: buildTool factory + checkPermissions method + typed throw for errors. Permissions are not checked inside call() — the framework calls checkPermissions(input, context) before dispatching to call(). Errors are thrown (not returned), and the framework formats them for the LLM.
Why this matters
The LLM produces tool calls as JSON objects. Claude Code must: (1) validate the JSON against a schema, (2) check if the user permits this call, (3) execute the tool, (4) return a structured result back to the LLM. These four steps must be explicit and in order.
If a tool checked permissions after execution (or not at all), security would be broken. If validation happened after permission checking, the LLM could construct inputs that bypass validation for permitted tools. The pattern enforces the correct order: schema validation happens automatically when the framework calls the tool; checkPermissions is called by the framework before call() is ever reached; call() can assume permission is already granted.
Using Zod as the schema source of truth means the LLM's JSON schema (shown in the system prompt) and the runtime validator are the same artifact. When you change one, you change both.
How to apply it
- Define
inputSchemausinglazySchema(() => z.strictObject({ ... })). Add.describe()to each field — these become the LLM's parameter documentation. - Implement
isConcurrencySafe(input)andisReadOnly(input). These are called with the actual input, so you can make them input-dependent (e.g., a bash tool is concurrent-safe only for read commands). - Implement
checkPermissions()for side-effect tools — the framework calls it beforecall(). Return aPermissionDecisionindicating whether execution is allowed. - Return
{ data: result }fromcall()on success; throw for errors (the framework formats thrown errors for the LLM). - Use
onProgressto stream partial results to the UI. Call it with typed progress objects as work proceeds.
In the source
// Source: src/tools/FileReadTool/FileReadTool.ts (real file, real pattern)
import { buildTool, type ToolDef } from '../../Tool.js'
import { lazySchema } from '../../utils/lazySchema.js'
const inputSchema = lazySchema(() =>
z.strictObject({
file_path: z.string().describe('The absolute path to the file to read'),
offset: z.number().int().nonnegative().optional().describe('Line number to start reading from'),
limit: z.number().int().positive().optional().describe('Number of lines to read'),
})
)
type InputSchema = ReturnType
export const FileReadTool = buildTool({
name: FILE_READ_TOOL_NAME,
searchHint: 'read files, images, PDFs, notebooks',
strict: true,
async description() { return DESCRIPTION },
// Zod schema exposed as a getter — evaluated lazily on first access
get inputSchema(): InputSchema { return inputSchema() },
isConcurrencySafe() { return true },
isReadOnly() { return true },
// Framework calls this BEFORE call() — tool never needs to re-check
async checkPermissions(input, context): Promise {
return checkReadPermissionForTool(FileReadTool, input, appState.toolPermissionContext)
},
async call({ file_path, offset = 1, limit }, context, _canUseTool?) {
// Permission already granted by the time we reach here
const content = await readFile(file_path, { offset, limit })
// Return { data: T } on success — throw on error
return { data: { type: 'text', file: { filePath: file_path, content, numLines: limit } } }
},
})
Notice that description() is async and returns a string rather than a static property — this lets the UI show "Read src/main.tsx" instead of "Read a file". _canUseTool in call() is available only for forwarding to sub-tools; most tools ignore it entirely.
Apply it to your code
Before — capability implemented as an unstructured function:
// No schema, no permission check, throws on error, no streaming
async function searchFiles(pattern: string, dir: string): Promise {
const results = await glob(pattern, { cwd: dir })
if (results.length === 0) {
throw new Error(`No files matching ${pattern}`)
}
return results
}
After — same capability as a proper Tool:
import { z } from 'zod'
import { buildTool } from '../../Tool.js'
import { lazySchema } from '../../utils/lazySchema.js'
const inputSchema = lazySchema(() =>
z.strictObject({
pattern: z.string().describe('Glob pattern to match (e.g. **/*.ts)'),
path: z.string().optional().describe('Directory to search in. Defaults to cwd.'),
})
)
type InputSchema = ReturnType
export const GlobTool = buildTool({
name: GLOB_TOOL_NAME,
searchHint: 'find files by glob pattern',
async description(input) {
return `Find files matching ${input.pattern}${input.path ? ` in ${input.path}` : ''}`
},
get inputSchema(): InputSchema { return inputSchema() },
// Glob is pure read — safe to run concurrently with other read operations
isConcurrencySafe: () => true,
isReadOnly: () => true,
// Read-only tools typically need no permission check; buildTool supplies a permissive default.
// For a tool with side effects, implement checkPermissions() here instead.
async call(args, context) {
// By the time call() runs, permissions are already settled
const cwd = args.path ?? context.getAppState().cwd
const results = await glob(args.pattern, { cwd })
// Return empty array on no matches — not an error; let the LLM decide
// Throw on unexpected failures — framework formats the error for the LLM
return { data: results }
},
})
Signals that you need this pattern
- A capability needs LLM access but is implemented as a function called from the query loop directly
- A tool is reading
process.envor global singletons instead ofcontext.getAppState() - A tool manually calls
canUseToolinsidecall()instead of implementingcheckPermissions() - The Zod schema and the TypeScript interface are defined separately and can drift
isConcurrencySafealways returnsfalsewithout examining the input
Signals that you're over-applying it
- Pure computation helpers (formatting, parsing) do not need Tool wrapping
- Utilities called only from tests or other tools'
call()implementations don't need schemas - Don't implement
isDestructivefor every tool — only tools that perform irreversible mutations
Works with
domain-model— explains where Tools fit in the full systempermission-system— howcheckPermissionsevaluates and what happens after denialasync-concurrency— howisConcurrencySafeaffects the execution schedulererror-handling— full error propagation philosophy for tool results
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: TechyMT
- Source: TechyMT/claude-code-superpowers
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.