Install
$ agentstack add skill-telagod-code-abyss-architecting-security ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
安全架构与治理
> 架构是预防层,不是补丁。先建模再写代码,先定边界再开 API。控制必须可证据化。
路由
| 意图 | 秘典 | 核心 | |------|------|------| | 威胁建模 | [threat-modeling](references/threat-modeling.md) | STRIDE / PASTA / LINDDUN / DFD / Attack Tree | | 身份与零信任 | [identity-and-zero-trust](references/identity-and-zero-trust.md) | IAM / SSO / MFA / Kerberos / PAM / Conditional Access | | 合规与证据 | [compliance-and-evidence](references/compliance-and-evidence.md) | SOC2 / PCI / HIPAA / GDPR / ISO27001 / DLP / 隐私工程 |
何时使用
| 场景 | 用 | 不用 | |------|----|----| | 新系统设计 / 新攻击面引入 | ✅ STRIDE + DFD | — | | 重大架构变更(鉴权、数据流、信任边界)| ✅ 重新建模 | — | | 引入 PII / PHI / PCI 数据 | ✅ LINDDUN + 合规映射 | — | | 上线前安全门禁 / 客户安全问卷 | ✅ 控制矩阵 + 证据 | — | | 已有架构无变更 | ❌ | 用现有控制即可 | | 仅 bug 修复 / 样式调整 | ❌ | 走 [analyzing-security](../analyzing-security/SKILL.md) | | 渗透实施层面 | ❌ | 用 [securing-systems](../securing-systems/SKILL.md) |
执行链
威胁建模 (STRIDE/PASTA/LINDDUN)
→ 控制设计 (preventive / detective / responsive 三层)
→ 实现 (代码、IaC、policy-as-code)
→ 验证 (渗透 / 红队 / 控制测试)
→ 证据留痕 (日志 / 审计 / 合规映射)
每环必须可回答「这控制对应哪条威胁?这威胁缓解到什么残留水平?谁验收?」
决策矩阵
| 决策点 | 选项 A | 选项 B | 判据 | |--------|--------|--------|------| | 鉴权协议 | SAML 2.0 | OIDC | 企业内部 SSO → SAML;移动/SPA/API → OIDC | | MFA 强度 | TOTP / Push | FIDO2 / WebAuthn | 高价值账号、抗钓鱼 → FIDO2 强制 | | 特权访问 | Standing privilege | JIT + Approval | 生产/敏感 → JIT;运维便利 → Standing 必有补偿 | | 合规起步 | SOC 2 Type I | Type II | 客户问卷应付 → I;正式审计 → II(6-12月观察期)| | 数据脱敏 | 假名化(可逆)| 匿名化(不可逆)| 业务侧仍需关联 → 假名化 + KMS;统计/共享 → 匿名化 | | 跨境传输 | SCC | BCR | 偶发场景 → SCC;跨国集团内部 → BCR |
与其他 skill 联动
- 威胁建模产出 → [analyzing-security](../analyzing-security/SKILL.md) 把高危项纳入扫描规则
- 代码层防御 → [securing-systems](../securing-systems/SKILL.md)(pentest / code-audit / red-team)
- IaC 策略落地 → [provisioning-infrastructure](../provisioning-infrastructure/SKILL.md)(OPA / Sentinel / Conftest)
- LLM/Agent 系统威胁 → [building-agent-systems](../building-agent-systems/SKILL.md)(Prompt Injection / 模型窃取)
- API 接口面 → [designing-architectures](../designing-architectures/SKILL.md) 的
api-design.md - 审计证据自动化 → [automating-devops](../automating-devops/SKILL.md)(CI 持续合规)
铁律
- 先建模再写代码 — 威胁清单未出,代码不动;信任边界未画,接口不开。
- 控制必须证据化 — 任何控制都要回答「日志在哪?审计点在哪?谁是 owner?SLA 多久?」
- 零信任默认拒绝 — 永不信任、始终验证、最小权限到请求级;缺一即非零信任。
- 合规不是法律意见 — 框架映射可以做,最终结论须法务/合规官签字。
- 残留风险必须留痕 — 不能消的风险要在 DESIGN.md / 风险登记册显式接受 + 补偿控制。
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: telagod
- Source: telagod/code-abyss
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://www.npmjs.com/package/code-abyss
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.