Install
$ agentstack add skill-the-ai-directory-company-agents-and-skills-competitive-analysis ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Competitive Analysis
Before you start
Gather the following from the user:
- What is your product/service? (One-sentence description and primary value proposition)
- Who are your known competitors? (Direct and indirect — list at least 3)
- What market segment? (Enterprise, SMB, consumer, developer tools, etc.)
- What decision are you informing? (Pricing, positioning, feature roadmap, GTM strategy, fundraising)
- What data sources are available? (Public websites, G2/Capterra reviews, pricing pages, job postings, SEC filings)
If the user says "we have no competitors," push back: "Every product competes with something — even if it's spreadsheets, manual processes, or doing nothing. Who are customers using today to solve this problem?"
Competitor identification
Start by mapping the competitive landscape into three tiers.
| Tier | Definition | Example |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
| Direct | Same problem, same customer segment, same approach | Competitor A vs You |
| Indirect | Same problem, different approach or different segment | Spreadsheets, agencies|
| Adjacent | Different problem today, could expand into your space | Platform with overlap |
List 3-5 direct competitors, 2-3 indirect, and 1-2 adjacent. For each, capture:
| Competitor | Tier | Founded | Funding/Revenue | HQ | Est. Customers |
|---------------|----------|---------|-----------------|----------|----------------|
| Competitor A | Direct | 2019 | $50M Series B | SF, USA | ~5,000 SMBs |
| Competitor B | Direct | 2017 | $120M ARR | London | ~2,000 Ent. |
| Manual process| Indirect | N/A | N/A | N/A | Everyone else |
Feature comparison matrix
Compare features that matter for the purchase decision. Use a clear rating system.
Rating: Y = Yes | P = Partial | N = No | ? = Unknown
| Feature | Your Product | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C |
|---------------------|-------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Core feature 1 | Y | Y | P | N |
| Core feature 2 | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Integration X | P | Y | N | Y |
| Self-serve onboard | Y | N | Y | N |
| Enterprise SSO | N | Y | Y | Y |
| API access | Y | Y | P | N |
Weight features by importance to the target buyer. A feature your buyer does not care about is not a competitive advantage.
Positioning analysis
For each direct competitor, map their positioning using this template.
## [Competitor Name]
Tagline: [From their homepage]
Target buyer: [Who they sell to — title, company size]
Primary value: [Their #1 claimed benefit]
Pricing model: [Free tier? Per seat? Usage-based?]
Key message: [Core narrative from marketing — "the X for Y" or "unlike Z, we..."]
Differentiator: [What they emphasize as unique]
Weakness signal: [Complaints from reviews, missing features, churn patterns]
Strengths and weaknesses assessment
Use a structured SWOT-style analysis per competitor. Focus on observable evidence, not speculation.
## [Competitor Name] — Assessment
Strengths (what they do well):
- [Evidence-backed strength — cite source: G2 review, pricing page, job posting]
- [Evidence-backed strength]
Weaknesses (where they fall short):
- [Evidence-backed weakness — cite source]
- [Evidence-backed weakness]
Opportunities for you (gaps they leave open):
- [Specific gap you can exploit]
Threats from them (risks to your position):
- [Specific risk — e.g., they're hiring for your feature area]
Opportunity mapping
Synthesize the analysis into actionable opportunities ranked by impact and feasibility.
| Opportunity | Evidence | Impact | Effort |
|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Underserved SMB segment | Comp A/B focus on enterprise only | High | Medium |
| No competitor offers self-serve | All require demo/sales call | High | Low |
| Integration gap with [Tool X] | Top-requested in G2 reviews | Medium | Low |
| Price point gap at $X-Y/month | Comp A is $100+, no mid-tier option | High | Medium |
Quality checklist
Before delivering the analysis, verify:
- [ ] At least 3 direct competitors are profiled with evidence, not just names
- [ ] Feature comparison is weighted by buyer importance, not just feature count
- [ ] Positioning analysis uses actual competitor messaging, not your interpretation
- [ ] Weaknesses cite observable evidence (reviews, missing features), not assumptions
- [ ] Opportunities are ranked by impact and effort
- [ ] The analysis answers the specific decision the user needs to make
- [ ] Sources are noted (pricing pages, review sites, job boards, press releases)
Common mistakes
- Listing features without weighting. Having 50 features vs. a competitor's 30 means nothing if the buyer only cares about 5. Weight the comparison by what drives purchase decisions.
- Relying on competitor marketing copy as truth. Their homepage says "enterprise-grade security." Their G2 reviews say "no SOC 2." Use third-party evidence, not self-reported claims.
- Ignoring indirect competitors. The biggest competitor for most products is "do nothing" or "use a spreadsheet." Include the status quo in your analysis.
- Analysis without actionable recommendations. A competitive matrix that doesn't lead to "so we should do X" is an academic exercise. End with ranked opportunities tied to decisions.
- One-time snapshot instead of ongoing tracking. Competitors change pricing, ship features, and pivot positioning. Schedule quarterly updates to the analysis.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: The-AI-Directory-Company
- Source: The-AI-Directory-Company/agents-and-skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://ai-directory.company
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.