AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Competitive Analysis

skill-the-ai-directory-company-agents-and-skills-competitive-analysis · by The-AI-Directory-Company

Structured market research template for identifying competitors, analyzing positioning, comparing features, assessing strengths and weaknesses, and finding market opportunities.

No reviews yet
0 installs
3 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-the-ai-directory-company-agents-and-skills-competitive-analysis

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Competitive Analysis? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Competitive Analysis

Before you start

Gather the following from the user:

  1. What is your product/service? (One-sentence description and primary value proposition)
  2. Who are your known competitors? (Direct and indirect — list at least 3)
  3. What market segment? (Enterprise, SMB, consumer, developer tools, etc.)
  4. What decision are you informing? (Pricing, positioning, feature roadmap, GTM strategy, fundraising)
  5. What data sources are available? (Public websites, G2/Capterra reviews, pricing pages, job postings, SEC filings)

If the user says "we have no competitors," push back: "Every product competes with something — even if it's spreadsheets, manual processes, or doing nothing. Who are customers using today to solve this problem?"

Competitor identification

Start by mapping the competitive landscape into three tiers.

| Tier     | Definition                                              | Example               |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
| Direct   | Same problem, same customer segment, same approach     | Competitor A vs You   |
| Indirect | Same problem, different approach or different segment   | Spreadsheets, agencies|
| Adjacent | Different problem today, could expand into your space   | Platform with overlap |

List 3-5 direct competitors, 2-3 indirect, and 1-2 adjacent. For each, capture:

| Competitor     | Tier     | Founded | Funding/Revenue | HQ       | Est. Customers |
|---------------|----------|---------|-----------------|----------|----------------|
| Competitor A  | Direct   | 2019    | $50M Series B   | SF, USA  | ~5,000 SMBs    |
| Competitor B  | Direct   | 2017    | $120M ARR       | London   | ~2,000 Ent.    |
| Manual process| Indirect | N/A     | N/A             | N/A      | Everyone else  |

Feature comparison matrix

Compare features that matter for the purchase decision. Use a clear rating system.

Rating: Y = Yes | P = Partial | N = No | ? = Unknown

| Feature              | Your Product | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C |
|---------------------|-------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Core feature 1      | Y           | Y      | P      | N      |
| Core feature 2      | Y           | Y      | Y      | Y      |
| Integration X       | P           | Y      | N      | Y      |
| Self-serve onboard  | Y           | N      | Y      | N      |
| Enterprise SSO      | N           | Y      | Y      | Y      |
| API access          | Y           | Y      | P      | N      |

Weight features by importance to the target buyer. A feature your buyer does not care about is not a competitive advantage.

Positioning analysis

For each direct competitor, map their positioning using this template.

## [Competitor Name]

Tagline:        [From their homepage]
Target buyer:   [Who they sell to — title, company size]
Primary value:  [Their #1 claimed benefit]
Pricing model:  [Free tier? Per seat? Usage-based?]
Key message:    [Core narrative from marketing — "the X for Y" or "unlike Z, we..."]
Differentiator: [What they emphasize as unique]
Weakness signal: [Complaints from reviews, missing features, churn patterns]

Strengths and weaknesses assessment

Use a structured SWOT-style analysis per competitor. Focus on observable evidence, not speculation.

## [Competitor Name] — Assessment

Strengths (what they do well):
- [Evidence-backed strength — cite source: G2 review, pricing page, job posting]
- [Evidence-backed strength]

Weaknesses (where they fall short):
- [Evidence-backed weakness — cite source]
- [Evidence-backed weakness]

Opportunities for you (gaps they leave open):
- [Specific gap you can exploit]

Threats from them (risks to your position):
- [Specific risk — e.g., they're hiring for your feature area]

Opportunity mapping

Synthesize the analysis into actionable opportunities ranked by impact and feasibility.

| Opportunity                          | Evidence                              | Impact | Effort |
|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Underserved SMB segment              | Comp A/B focus on enterprise only     | High   | Medium |
| No competitor offers self-serve      | All require demo/sales call           | High   | Low    |
| Integration gap with [Tool X]        | Top-requested in G2 reviews           | Medium | Low    |
| Price point gap at $X-Y/month        | Comp A is $100+, no mid-tier option   | High   | Medium |

Quality checklist

Before delivering the analysis, verify:

  • [ ] At least 3 direct competitors are profiled with evidence, not just names
  • [ ] Feature comparison is weighted by buyer importance, not just feature count
  • [ ] Positioning analysis uses actual competitor messaging, not your interpretation
  • [ ] Weaknesses cite observable evidence (reviews, missing features), not assumptions
  • [ ] Opportunities are ranked by impact and effort
  • [ ] The analysis answers the specific decision the user needs to make
  • [ ] Sources are noted (pricing pages, review sites, job boards, press releases)

Common mistakes

  • Listing features without weighting. Having 50 features vs. a competitor's 30 means nothing if the buyer only cares about 5. Weight the comparison by what drives purchase decisions.
  • Relying on competitor marketing copy as truth. Their homepage says "enterprise-grade security." Their G2 reviews say "no SOC 2." Use third-party evidence, not self-reported claims.
  • Ignoring indirect competitors. The biggest competitor for most products is "do nothing" or "use a spreadsheet." Include the status quo in your analysis.
  • Analysis without actionable recommendations. A competitive matrix that doesn't lead to "so we should do X" is an academic exercise. End with ranked opportunities tied to decisions.
  • One-time snapshot instead of ongoing tracking. Competitors change pricing, ship features, and pivot positioning. Schedule quarterly updates to the analysis.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.