AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Evals Specify

skill-tikalk-adlc-team-skills-evals-specify · by tikalk

Extract eval criteria from product specs and production failure traces (bottom-up error analysis). Writes proposed criteria to .adlc/drafts/evals/.

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-tikalk-adlc-team-skills-evals-specify

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-tikalk-adlc-team-skills-evals-specify)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Evals Specify? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

evals-specify

What this skill does

Conducts bottom-up error analysis following EDD Principles III & IX (Error Analysis & Test Data as Code) to discover and document draft evaluation criteria from human observation of system failures.

Output:

  1. Draft Eval Records - Individual EVAL-*.md files in .adlc/drafts/evals/ with open coding notes
  2. Error Pattern Documentation - Bottom-up failure taxonomy from actual traces
  3. Pass/Fail Examples - Real examples that should pass/fail each criterion
  4. Auto-handoff to /evals-clarify for axial coding and clustering

Key EDD Principles Applied:

  • Principle III: Error Analysis & Pattern Discovery - Open coding → failure taxonomy
  • Principle IX: Test Data as Code - Dataset planning and coverage analysis
  • Principle II: Binary Pass/Fail - Maintain strict binary pass/fail conditions
  • Principle V: Trajectory Observability - Track full multi-turn conversation traces

When to use

  • Starting evaluation development: No existing criteria, need discovery from failure logs
  • Production incident analysis: Recent failures require systematic analysis
  • Quality assessment: Discovering and codifying boundary conditions from failures

When NOT to use

  • No failure traces/specs: Generate synthetic traces first, or use /evals-init to set up security baselines
  • Known criteria already exist: Use /evals-clarify to refine or /evals-implement to generate code

Process

User Input

$ARGUMENTS

Treat user input as specific failure areas or error patterns to analyze (e.g., "authentication bypass", "RAG irrelevant results").

  • --traces N — Number of traces to analyze (default: 20, min for theoretical saturation)
  • --source SOURCE — Trace source location (e.g., logs, support tickets)

Execution Steps

Phase 1: Open Coding Analysis
  • Reviews the user-provided failure logs or spec requirements.
  • Conducts open coding of traces to discover recurring failure patterns (EDD Principle III).
  • Identifies: core problem, causal conditions, and consequences.
Phase 2: Create Draft Criteria

Group patterns into draft criteria. For each:

  • Define strict Pass Condition (observable, binary yes/no)
  • Define strict Fail Condition (observable, binary yes/no)
  • Document real pass/fail examples directly from traces
Phase 3: Create Draft Files
  • Copy skills/evals/evals-templates/eval-criterion-template.md to .adlc/drafts/evals/EVAL-{NNN}.md.
  • Populate metadata and error analysis notes.
  • Regenerate index at .adlc/drafts/evals/evals.md.
Phase 4: Auto-Handoff

Trigger /evals-clarify for axial coding and clustering.

Verification

  • Draft files created at .adlc/drafts/evals/EVAL-*.md
  • Index file .adlc/drafts/evals/evals.md updated with draft summaries
  • Each draft contains: status "draft", pass/fail conditions, trace sources, and concrete examples
  • Auto-handoff context produced with list of created drafts

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.