Install
$ agentstack add skill-tikalk-adlc-team-skills-product-implement ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
product-implement
What this skill does
Transforms accepted PDRs into a comprehensive, self-contained PRD.md using a three-phase DAG:
- Plan Agent: Analyze PDRs, detect feature-areas, generate customized DAG, get user approval
- Execute Agent: Generate sections per feature-area with mandatory checkpoint after Requirements
- Summarize Agent: Aggregate sections, resolve conflicts, produce unified
PRD.md
Output:
PRD.md(repo root) — self-contained product requirements{REPO_ROOT}/.adlc/product/sections/{feature-area}/{section}.md— intermediate section files- Accepted PDRs moved to
{REPO_ROOT}/.adlc/memory/pdr/
When to use
- After
/product-clarifyhas approved PDRs - After
/product-initto document existing product - PDR updates requiring PRD regeneration
When NOT to use
- No Accepted PDRs (run
/product-clarifyfirst) - Minor PRD edits (edit
PRD.mddirectly)
Pre-Flight Validation
Before starting, verify prerequisites:
- Check PDRs exist:
{REPO_ROOT}/.adlc/drafts/pdr/PDR-*.md - Check for Accepted PDRs: Count files with status "Accepted"
- If zero: STOP and output:
`` Cannot proceed: No Accepted PDRs found. Run /product-clarify to review and approve PDRs first. ``
- If ≥1: Proceed
Three-Phase DAG Workflow
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PHASE 1: PLAN (Plan Agent) │
│ Load PDRs → Detect Feature-Areas → Generate DAG → Approve│
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PHASE 2: EXECUTE (Execute Agent) │
│ Overview → Problem → Goals → Metrics → Personas │
│ → [REQUIREMENTS CHECKPOINT] ← MANDATORY USER APPROVAL │
│ → NFRs → Out-of-Scope → Risks → Roadmap → PDR-Summary │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PHASE 3: SUMMARIZE (Summarize Agent) │
│ Read sections → Detect conflicts → Resolve → PRD.md │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Execution Steps
Phase 1: Plan
Step 1.1: Load and Analyze PDRs
- Read all
PDR-*.mdfiles from.adlc/drafts/pdr/ - Filter to Accepted status only
- Parse feature-area from each PDR
- Group PDRs by feature-area
Step 1.2: Detect Feature-Area Characteristics
| Characteristic | Detection Pattern | DAG Customization | |---------------|-------------------|-------------------| | B2B SaaS | Enterprise, admin, SSO | Include compliance sections | | Consumer App | Mobile, freemium, social | Simplify requirements | | Platform | API, integrations, developer | Expand NFRs | | Marketplace | Multi-sided, transaction | Add business model sections |
Step 1.3: Generate Customized DAG
Default DAG (all 15 sections):
Document Information → Executive Summary → Overview → Problem
→ Market Opportunity → Goals → Metrics → Personas
→ [CHECKPOINT: Requirements]
→ NFRs → Out-of-Scope → Risks → Investment
→ Roadmap → Go-to-Market → PDR-Summary
Section numbering (fixed):
- 1. Document Information
- 1.5 Executive Summary
- 2. Overview
- 3. The Problem
- 3.5 Market Opportunity
- 4. Goals & Objectives
- 5. Success Metrics
- 6. Personas
- 7. Functional Requirements
- 8. Non-Functional Requirements
- 9. Out of Scope
- 10. Risks & Mitigation
- 10.5 Investment & Resources
- 11. Roadmap & Milestones
- 11.5 Go-to-Market Strategy
- 12. PDR Summary
Step 1.4: Present Plan for Approval
## DAG Execution Plan
**Feature-Areas detected**: 3
**Total sections**: 15
**Feature-Area: Core**
**PDRs**: PDR-001, PDR-005, PDR-008
**DAG**: Document Info → Executive Summary → Overview → Problem
→ Market Opportunity → Goals → Metrics → Personas
→ [Requirements Checkpoint] → NFRs → Out-of-Scope → Risks
→ Investment → Roadmap → GTM → PDR-Summary
**Approve this plan?** [Yes/Modify/Cancel]
Step 1.5: Write state.json
{
"version": "1.0",
"phase": "plan_approved",
"feature_areas": [
{
"id": "core",
"name": "Core",
"pdrs": ["PDR-001", "PDR-005"],
"dag": ["document-info", "executive-summary", "overview", "problem", ...],
"progress": {}
}
],
"checkpoint": {
"enabled": true,
"after_section": "requirements",
"status": "pending"
}
}
Phase 2: Execute
For each section in the DAG:
- Check dependencies — ensure all prerequisites completed
- Load section template —
templates/sections/{section}.md - Generate content — fill template with PDR-derived content
- Write section file —
.adlc/product/sections/{feature-area}/{section}.md - Validate — run
scripts/bash/validate-prd.sh {section}.md - Update state.json — mark section as "completed"
Section template usage (MANDATORY):
- Read template FIRST
- Fill ALL [PLACEHOLDERS]
- NEVER generate from scratch
In-section diagrams (MANDATORY):
- Use
`mermaidcode blocks - Use
flowchartkeyword (NOT deprecatedgraph) - ASCII box-drawing characters are PROHIBITED
- Diagrams embedded in their home sections
| Section | Diagram Type | Subsection | |---------|-------------|------------| | 2. Overview | Feature Hierarchy (flowchart TD) | 2.4 | | 2. Overview | Architecture (flowchart TB) | 2.5 | | 6. Personas | User Journey (journey) | 6.4 | | 7. Requirements | Req Dependencies (flowchart LR) | 7.4 | | 7. Requirements | Feature Dependencies (flowchart LR) | 7.5 | | 11. Roadmap | Gantt Chart (gantt) | 11.1 |
Requirements Checkpoint (MANDATORY):
After generating Requirements section:
## CHECKPOINT: Requirements Section Complete
The Requirements section has been generated.
**Why checkpoint here?** Requirements shapes:
- NFRs (how requirements are met)
- Out-of-Scope (what's NOT required)
- Risks (technical feasibility)
- Roadmap (priority and sequencing)
**Options**:
A) Approve — Continue to remaining sections
B) Modify — Edit requirements, then continue
C) Restart — Regenerate from Problem phase
D) Cancel — Stop execution
Phase 3: Summarize
Step 3.1: Read All Sections FROM DISK
> CRITICAL: Read each section file from filesystem. Do NOT use content from memory.
- Scan
.adlc/product/sections/for all.mdfiles - Read each file
- Validate: ≥20 lines, proper headers
Step 3.2: Detect Cross-Feature-Area Conflicts
| Conflict Type | Detection | Resolution | |--------------|-----------|------------| | Duplicate requirements | Same requirement, different wording | Standardize to PDR terminology | | Priority mismatch | Same feature, different priority | Defer to PDR | | Metric inconsistency | Same metric, different definition | Use PDR definition |
Step 3.3: Aggregate into PRD.md
> CRITICAL: PRD.md MUST be SELF-CONTAINED. > - ALL diagrams embedded IN-SECTION > - ZERO reader-facing links to .adlc/ paths > - Use in-document anchors only: [Section 2.4](#24-feature-hierarchy) > - PDR references as plain text: PDR-078 (NOT linked)
PRD structure (must match template):
# Product Requirements Document: [Product Name]
## 1. Document Information
[Quick Stats, revision history, approval]
## 1.5 Executive Summary
[Business case, ROI, recommendation]
## 2. Overview
[Product description, scope]
### 2.4 Feature Hierarchy [MERMAID flowchart TD]
### 2.5 Architecture Overview [MERMAID flowchart TB]
## 3. The Problem
[Problem statement, validation evidence]
## 3.5 Market Opportunity
[TAM/SAM/SOM, competitive landscape]
## 4. Goals & Objectives
[Primary, technical, business goals traced to PDRs]
## 5. Success Metrics
[Adoption, engagement, quality]
### 5.5 Business Outcome Metrics
### 5.6 Financial Metrics
## 6. Personas
[Primary, secondary, anti-personas]
### 6.4 User Journey [MERMAID journey]
## 7. Functional Requirements [CHECKPOINT]
[User stories, REQ-XXX IDs, priority matrix]
### 7.4 Requirement Dependencies [MERMAID flowchart LR]
### 7.5 Feature Dependencies [MERMAID flowchart LR]
## 8. Non-Functional Requirements
[Performance, security, reliability, scalability]
## 9. Out of Scope
[Feature, technical, market exclusions]
## 10. Risks & Mitigation
[Risk summary, technical, market, operational]
### 10.4 Business Risks
## 10.5 Investment & Resources
[Team, budget, ROI, go/no-go criteria]
## 11. Roadmap & Milestones
### 11.1 Roadmap Overview [MERMAID gantt]
[Milestone details with demo sentences]
### 11.2 Milestone Gates & Progress
[Per milestone: done-means definition, feature rollup, gate table, issue/evidence status — sourced from milestone PDRs]
## 11.5 Go-to-Market Strategy
[Launch phases, pricing, messaging]
## 12. PDR Summary
[Key decisions, constitution alignment — NO external links]
Phase 4: PDR Lifecycle Management (MANDATORY)
Step 4.1: Move Accepted PDRs to Memory
For each PDR with status "Accepted":
- Read from
.adlc/drafts/pdr/PDR-{NNN}.md - Write to
.adlc/memory/pdr/PDR-{NNN}.md - Update status to "Completed" in memory copy
Step 4.2: Clean Up Drafts
- Remove moved PDRs from
.adlc/drafts/pdr/ - Retain Proposed/Discovered PDRs in drafts
- Regenerate
pdr.mdindex
Step 4.3: Update state.json
{
"phase": "completed",
"pdr_lifecycle": {
"pdrs_promoted": [N],
"memory_pdr_written": true,
"drafts_retained": true,
"drafts_reason": "Proposed/Discovered PDRs remain"
}
}
Phase 5: Final Verification
Before marking complete, verify ALL checks:
| # | Check | Expected | |---|-------|----------| | 1 | Section files on disk | N files in .adlc/product/sections/ | | 2 | PRD.md exists | Yes | | 3 | PRD.md content size | >200 lines | | 4 | PRD.md has all sections | Sections 1-12 + sub-sections | | 5 | PRD.md is self-contained | 0 .adlc/ links | | 6 | Diagrams embedded | ≥4 mermaid blocks | | 7 | Memory PDRs written | .adlc/memory/pdr/PDR-*.md exist | | 8 | state.json consistent | All sections "completed" |
Gate Rule: If ANY check fails → do NOT mark as completed. Report failures.
PDR Traceability Rules
- Every section must reference source PDRs with ID
- Every requirement (REQ-XXX) must trace to a PDR
- No content without PDR backing
- PDRs are source of truth for conflict resolution
Configuration
PDR_DRAFTS_DIR—{REPO_ROOT}/.adlc/drafts/pdrPDR_MEMORY_DIR—{REPO_ROOT}/.adlc/memory/pdrPRD_FILE—{REPO_ROOT}/PRD.mdSECTIONS_DIR—{REPO_ROOT}/.adlc/product/sectionsSTATE_FILE—{REPO_ROOT}/.adlc/product/state.json
12-Factor Alignment
- Factor III (Mission Definition): Compiles mission decisions into actionable requirements
- Factor IV (Structured Planning): DAG orchestration separates planning from execution
- Factor IX (Traceability): Every PRD element traces back to a PDR
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality | |-----------------|---------| | "I'll skip the checkpoint and just generate everything." | Requirements shapes NFRs, Out-of-Scope, Risks, and Roadmap. Skipping the checkpoint risks cascading errors. | | "The PRD can reference section files." | PRD.md MUST be self-contained. External references break when section files are moved or deleted. | | "I don't need to move PDRs to memory." | Without promotion, drafts and memory diverge. The next clarify session sees stale data. |
Red Flags
- Generating PRD from non-Accepted PDRs — implement skips Proposed/Discovered; the PRD will be incomplete.
- Writing PRD.md directly from PDRs — content MUST come from section files to ensure validation passed.
- Missing the Requirements checkpoint — this is the cornerstone section; errors here cascade.
- Leaving
.adlc/links in PRD.md — breaks self-containment; readers cannot follow internal paths.
Verification
- [ ] Pre-flight: ≥1 Accepted PDR exists
- [ ] Plan approved by user
- [ ] state.json written with DAG
- [ ] Each section file ≥20 lines
- [ ] validate-prd.sh passes for each section
- [ ] Requirements checkpoint approved by user
- [ ] PRD.md >200 lines with all 15 sections
- [ ] Zero
.adlc/links in PRD.md - [ ] ≥4 Mermaid diagrams embedded in-section
- [ ] All requirements trace to PDRs
- [ ] Accepted PDRs moved to
.adlc/memory/pdr/ - [ ] Final completion verification: all 8 checks pass
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: tikalk
- Source: tikalk/adlc-team-skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://github.com/tikalk/agentic-sdlc-12-factors
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.