Install
$ agentstack add skill-timeyour-agentskills-audit-collection-ai-product-audit ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
AI Product Audit
Use this skill to diagnose whether an AI-built product follows proven product patterns and converts inspiration into action.
product category + scenario -> pattern matching -> scenario audit -> conversion surface audit -> business reality check -> issue cards -> regression check -> lessons
This skill must not judge a product by visual polish alone. It asks whether the page prepares the user for a believable next step and provides a path to reach it.
When To Use
- The target is a lifestyle, service, commerce, creator, SaaS, portfolio, directory, or dashboard product.
/auditor/visual-qaflags a pattern mismatch or vague value proposition.- The user wants to know whether the page converts inspiration into action.
- Batch-auditing multiple sites for product-pattern fitness.
- Before declaring a page "conversion-ready" or "shippable."
Core Rules
- Separate product-pattern evidence from visual evidence — a polished page can still have a broken scenario.
- Compare against the proven pattern for the product category, not personal taste.
- Every finding needs three things: expected pattern, observed gap, and business risk.
- Use S0-S4 severity mapped to delivery and conversion risk, not subjective preference.
- Preserve the shared output shape: Scope, Evidence, Findings, Severity, Reproduction, Fix Suggestion, Regression Check, Lessons.
- For batch audits, emit a summary table first, then progressive per-site details.
- Mark payment, irreversible submission, and production mutation as
SKIPPED-SAFEunless explicitly allowed. - Never claim a product "understands its user" without citing a specific page element and its failure.
Workflow
- Intake and scope: identify product category, intended scenario, business outcome, conversion surfaces, and audit depth.
- Use
references/product-pattern-rubric.mdfor the full dimension list. - Use
references/category-pattern-catalog.mdfor category-specific pattern expectations.
- Surface and pattern check: discover the visible page surface; compare each page against its category pattern.
- Apply the permission model before any click, form fill, or authenticated action.
- Mark pages or flows that cannot be safely tested as
SKIPPED-SAFE.
- Scenario audit: ask the four Viba-inspired questions for each key page:
- What scenario is this page preparing the user for?
- What self-image, business outcome, or action does it help the user move toward?
- Can the user see themselves in the next step?
- Is the page only inspiration, or does it convert inspiration into action?
- Conversion surface audit: for each identified CTA, form, booking flow, checkout, or signup path:
- Is the primary CTA specific and actionable?
- Does the page contain a working conversion surface (not just a brochure)?
- Is there a visible path from inspiration to action in fewer than 3 clicks?
- Business reality check: distinguish real products from templates.
- Is there operational depth (backend, database, CMS, auth, content system)?
- Is there a monetization path or demonstrated usage?
- Does the evidence (source, live, or physical) support a real business claim?
- Evidence assembly and output: produce issue cards, pattern-fit table, and copyable fix prompts.
- Use the shared output shape for every finding.
- Include a Pattern Fit table and a Scenario Audit table.
- Bundle fix prompts so the user can copy them directly into Claude Code, Lovable, v0, or Bol.
- Regression and lessons: convert repeated pattern failures into guardrail updates or benchmark labels.
- Propose updates to
CLAUDE.mdonly when the pattern appears in 3+ audits with clear evidence. - Append lessons to the audit ledger in
validation/for future five-pass reviews.
References
references/product-pattern-rubric.mdreferences/category-pattern-catalog.md../audit/references/progressive-reporting.md(for batch audits and multi-step runs)../visual-qa/references/aesthetic-quality-audit.md(for pattern reference and AI slop signals)../audit/references/permission-model.md(before any live or authenticated action)
Output Format
AI Product-Pattern Audit Summary
Target:
Product Category:
Intended Scenario:
Pattern Fit Score:
Main Business Risk:
Fix First:
Pattern Fit Table
| Expected Pattern | Observed | Gap | Risk | S0-S4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
Scenario Audit
| Question | Answer | Evidence | Risk |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
Conversion Surface Map
| Surface | Present | Actionable | Evidence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
Business Reality
| Signal | Present | Evidence |
| --- | --- | --- |
Issue Cards
-
- Area:
- URL:
- Live position:
- Expected pattern:
- Observed:
- Business risk:
- Fix:
- Copy prompt:
- Regression check:
Copyable Fix Pack
1.
2.
3.
Lessons
Anti-Patterns
- Judging product quality by visual polish alone — visual QA and product-pattern audit are different dimensions.
- Applying SaaS patterns to a local service site, or portfolio patterns to a commerce site.
- Treating "vibe" or "mood" as a substitute for scenario clarity.
- Missing the "next step" test — if the user cannot describe what happens after clicking, the scenario is broken.
- Batch-auditing without first categorizing each site — mixed-category batches produce misleading summaries.
- Claiming a page "converts" because it has a CTA — the CTA must be specific, actionable, and lead to a working next step.
- Using product-pattern findings to rewrite copy subjectively — always tie the fix to a pattern mismatch, not a taste preference.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: timeyour
- Source: timeyour/agentskills-audit-collection
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://github.com/timeyour/agentskills-audit-collection
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.