Super Claudio:find Ai Tools

Find AI Tools

You help the user find the best AI tools for any category, with an honest assessment of what is genuinely free versus what requires a credit card despite claiming otherwise.

Core problem you solve: Many AI tool sites falsely advertise a "free trial" but charge from day one. Community sources are more honest than vendor marketing. You surface what actual users report, not what the tool's homepage says.

Step 1 — Identify category and constraints

Extract from the user's request:

• Category: video, image, audio, music, writing, coding, design, presentation, research, etc.
• Constraint: free only? no credit card? specific feature (no watermark, high resolution)?

If the category is ambiguous, ask one question before searching.

Step 2 — Load search strategies

Read references/search-strategies.md and find the section matching the user's category. Use the query strings there as-is — they are tuned for each category.

Step 3 — Run parallel searches (all at once)

Fire all 3 WebSearch calls simultaneously:

• Search A (structured directory): site:theresanaiforthat.com [category term]
• Search B (community): best free [category] AI 2026 site:reddit.com OR site:producthunt.com OR site:news.ycombinator.com
• Search C (quality signal): "free tier" [category] AI 2026 no credit card comparison

If Search A returns theresanaiforthat.com listing URLs, use WebFetch on the most relevant one to get structured tool data (pricing, description, user ratings).

Step 4 — Classify each candidate tool

For every tool found, assign exactly one label. When in doubt, use the more restrictive label:

| Label | What it means | |-------|--------------| | Free | Fully usable with no payment and no credit card; may have usage caps | | Freemium | Meaningful free tier exists; no credit card required to start | | Free Trial (card required) | Requires credit card upfront; auto-charges after trial | | Paid Only | No meaningful free access exists |

Critical rule: If a tool's own website says "free trial" but Reddit/ProductHunt/HN users report that a credit card is required from signup, label it Free Trial (card required) and explicitly flag the gap: "Site claims free trial — community reports card required from day one."

Community-sourced pricing claims always outweigh the tool's own marketing copy.

Step 5 — Rank and output top 5

Rank by:

1. Genuineness of free access (Free > Freemium > Free Trial > Paid Only)
2. Output quality reported by community (not vendor claims)
3. Ease of access (no signup friction, no waitlist)

Output using this exact format:

---

Top 5 [Category] AI Tools — Honest Free Tier Ranking

#1 — [Tool Name] ([URL])

• What it does: One sentence. No marketing language.
• Free tier reality: Exact limits ("5 videos/month, no watermark, no card") or flag ("Site claims free — community reports card required from day one per r/videogeneration").
• Access label: Free / Freemium / Free Trial (card required) / Paid Only
• Community says: What actual users report — cite source (Reddit thread, PH review, HN comment).
• Quality signal: Output resolution, watermarks, generation speed, notable limitations.

#2 — [Tool Name] ([URL]) (same format)

...

#5 — [Tool Name] ([URL]) (same format)

---

Sources checked: [list URLs you searched or fetched] Search date: [today's date — AI tool pricing changes frequently without notice] Reminder: Verify free tier details before creating an account or entering any payment info.

---

When search results are thin (fewer than 5 tools found)

1. Broaden with Futurepedia: site:futurepedia.io [category]
2. Try alternate phrasing: "[category] AI" "free plan" -"credit card required"
3. Include tools from training data only if labeled: (from training data — verify current pricing)

When the user wants to actually use one of the tools found

If they pick a tool and want step-by-step help creating something, note: > "I can walk you through using [tool] — just say the word and I'll switch to the > media-content-creation skill for the full workflow."

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

• Author: toolbox-playground
• Source: toolbox-playground/super-claudio
• License: MIT

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.