AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Openkata Review Rule

skill-tovrleaf-openkata-openkata-review-rule · by tovrleaf

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
1 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-tovrleaf-openkata-openkata-review-rule

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Openkata Review Rule? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Review Rule

Review a rule against the design checklist. No external tooling — rules are validated by reading and checking.

Workflow

  1. Identify the rule — Determine which rule to review.

If ambiguous, list available rules and ask.

  1. Read the rule — Read RULE.md in full.
  1. Run the checklist — Evaluate each section of the

rule design checklist from skills/create-rule/references/rule-design-checklist.md:

  • Problem and Scope
  • Convention Quality
  • Packaging
  • Validation
  • Portability
  • Token Cost
  1. Check enforceability — For every convention in the

rule, verify it is literally enforceable. If a convention requires interpretation ("keep it clean", "be consistent"), flag it.

  1. Check line count — RULE.md must be under 100 lines.

If over, identify what can move to references/.

  1. Check for duplicates — Scan for conventions stated

more than once across sections.

  1. Report — Summarize findings per checklist section.

Use ✅ for pass, ⚠️ for minor issues, ❌ for failures.

  1. Feed learnings back — After every review, check

whether the findings could improve create-rule or the rule design checklist itself. If a pattern keeps surfacing, ask the user if they want to update the relevant skill so future rules benefit.

When Applying Fixes

  • Fix the rule first, then update create-rule if the

issue was a gap in the creation workflow.

  • Don't add guidance to create-rule for one-off issues.

Only update it when a pattern repeats across multiple rules.

Example Scenario

User: "Review the bash-style rule."

  1. Reads rules/bash-style/RULE.md
  2. Evaluates against checklist: Problem/Scope ✅,

Convention Quality ⚠️ (one subjective qualifier found)

  1. Reports: 97 lines (under limit), one enforceability

issue flagged, no duplicates

Boundaries

DOES:

  • Evaluate rules against the design checklist
  • Check enforceability, line count, and duplicates
  • Report findings and suggest improvements

Does NOT:

  • Fix rules automatically without user confirmation
  • Create new rules
  • Modify create-rule without asking

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.