Install
$ agentstack add skill-travisjneuman-claude-auto-claude ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ● Environment & secrets Used
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Auto-Claude: Autonomous Coding Framework
Autonomous multi-agent system for complex feature implementation with QA validation.
When to Use
✅ Use Auto-Claude for:
- Complexity 3-4 - Well-defined features, multiple files
- Established codebases with clear patterns
- Repetitive tasks (CRUD, forms, API endpoints, auth flows)
- When you prefer review-at-end vs step-by-step
- Features requiring iterative refinement with QA validation
❌ Don't use Auto-Claude for:
- Complexity 1-2 - Use manual
/start-taskinstead - Complexity 5+ - Use
/gsd:new-projectinstead - Greenfield projects (no existing codebase patterns)
- Exploratory/research tasks (unclear requirements)
- Simple typo fixes or config changes
- Tasks requiring human decision-making during implementation
Quick Guide:
- Complexity 1-2 → Manual implementation
- Complexity 3-4 → Auto-Claude (autonomous)
- Complexity 5+ → GSD (multi-phase)
Core Capabilities
- Codebase Analysis - Generates semantic baseline
- Spec Generation - Creates detailed implementation plan
- Autonomous Implementation - Multi-agent coordination
- Git Worktree Isolation - Safe development in separate worktree
- QA Validation - Iterative quality checks
- Memory System - Graphiti-powered context retention
Workflow
# From project directory:
/auto-claude Add user authentication with JWT tokens
What Happens:
- Analyzes project structure → generates baseline
- Creates implementation spec → stores in ~/.auto-claude/specs/
- Creates git worktree → isolated development environment
- Autonomous agents implement → with QA loops
- Returns completed code → ready for review
Output Location: ~/.auto-claude/ (gitignored)
Integration with Existing Workflows
Manual Implementation:
/start-task [description] → Claude implements step-by-step
Autonomous Implementation:
/auto-claude [description] → Auto-Claude implements autonomously
Multi-Phase Projects:
/gsd:new-project → GSD for project management
Configuration
Location: ~/.auto-claude/.env
Required:
CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN- Get from/settingsin Claude Code
Optional (Recommended):
GRAPHITI_ENABLED=true- Semantic memoryGOOGLE_API_KEY- For Gemini embeddings (memory feature)- Alternative: Ollama (local) or disable memory
Trade-offs
Strengths:
- Autonomous with minimal oversight
- QA validation ensures quality
- Git worktree prevents main branch disruption
- Memory learns from previous sessions
Limitations:
- Best for established codebases
- Requires clear specifications
- Uses tokens for multi-agent iterations
- Manual merge required after completion
Examples
Good use cases:
- "Add user authentication with JWT tokens and session management"
- "Implement dark mode toggle with localStorage persistence"
- "Refactor API layer to use async/await instead of callbacks"
- "Add pagination to user list with 20 items per page"
- "Create export-to-CSV functionality for reports"
Poor use cases:
- "Fix typo in README" (too simple)
- "Explore best approach for state management" (exploratory)
- "Build entire e-commerce platform" (too large, use GSD)
- "Make the app better" (too vague)
Typical Timeline
- Analysis: 30 seconds
- Spec Generation: 1-2 minutes
- Implementation: 5-15 minutes (depends on complexity)
- QA Validation: 2-5 minutes
- Your Review: 5-10 minutes
Total: 15-30 minutes for most features
Related
generic-feature-developer- Manual implementation patternsdebug-systematic- Systematic debuggingtest-specialist- Testing strategies
Documentation
See ~/.claude/docs/AUTO-CLAUDE-GUIDE.md for:
- Complete setup instructions
- Real-world examples with detailed walkthroughs
- Troubleshooting guide
- Performance tips
- Comparison with other workflows
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: travisjneuman
- Source: travisjneuman/.claude
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://claude.travisjneuman.com
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.