AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Skills 2 0 Upgrade

skill-treylom-skills-2-0-upgrade-skills-2-0-upgrade · by treylom

Use when upgrading Claude Code skills to Skills 2.0 compliance, when diagnosing skill health scores, when frontmatter is missing or malformed, when skills exceed 500-line limit, when skill directories lack SKILL.md structure, or when compliance score needs improvement

No reviews yet
0 installs
25 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-treylom-skills-2-0-upgrade-skills-2-0-upgrade

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-treylom-skills-2-0-upgrade-skills-2-0-upgrade)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
4mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Skills 2 0 Upgrade? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Skills 2.0 Upgrade

Overview

Skills 2.0 is Anthropic's 2026 skill framework built on Progressive Disclosure:

  1. Frontmatter — fast routing and discovery
  2. SKILL.md — working guide (500 lines)
  • orphan directory (skill folder without SKILL.md)
  • broken reference (invalid references/ links)
  • description missing Use when... pattern
  • low or declining compliance score

Do not use for normal feature work inside a skill.

Upgrade Workflow — Phase-by-Phase Guide

Start by selecting which skills to upgrade, then diagnose and proceed phase by phase.

Step 0: Select target (always start here)

Ask the user what to upgrade before scanning anything:

What would you like to upgrade?
  1. A specific skill — enter the skill name
  2. Multiple skills — enter comma-separated names
  3. All skills — scan the entire directory

Resolve skill names to file paths:

  • my-skill$SKILLS_DIR/my-skill.md or $SKILLS_DIR/my-skill/SKILL.md
  • If not found, list available skills and ask the user to pick

All subsequent steps operate only on the selected scope.

Step 1: Diagnose

scripts/diagnose.sh  [--json|--verbose]

Present the user with:

  • per-skill score and failed checks (if specific skills selected)
  • overall compliance score and issue breakdown (if all skills)
  • top impactful issues

Then explain the upgrade path:

Your skills score X%. Here's what each upgrade phase would improve:

| Phase | Fixes | Expected Impact | Automation |
|-------|-------|-----------------|------------|
| P1-P2 | Frontmatter + name | +10-16%p | Fully automatic |
| P3    | Description "Use when..." | +8-16%p | Semi-auto (batch) |
| P4    | Invocation control | +1-3%p | Semi-auto (confirm) |
| P5+   | File splitting + structure | +2-6%p | Manual (Opus) |

Which phase would you like to run? (P1-P2 / P1-P3 / P1-P4 / all)

Step 2: Execute chosen phases

Run scripts/backup.sh before any changes.

P1-P2 (Automatic): Run scripts/batch-p1p2p3.py --dry-run to preview, then apply.

  • P1 adds missing frontmatter with auto-generated name and description
  • P2 normalizes name fields to kebab-case
  • No user confirmation needed — deterministic pattern matching

P3 (Semi-automatic): Run scripts/batch-p1p2p3.py which also handles P3.

  • Transforms existing descriptions to "Use when..." pattern
  • Preserves Korean text, proper nouns, and acronyms
  • Show the user a sample of changes before applying

P4 (Confirm with user): Identify reference-type skills using heuristics (name contains guide/reference/spec/examples/templates/schema/collection/strategies/checklist).

  • Present candidate list to user
  • Add disable-model-invocation: true to confirmed files

Step 3: Re-diagnose and report

Run diagnosis again and show before/after comparison:

Compliance improved: X% → Y% (+Z%p)

| Priority | Before | After | Fixed |
|----------|--------|-------|-------|
| P1       | N      | 0     | N     |
| P2       | N      | 0     | N     |
| P3       | N      | M     | N-M   |
| P4       | N      | M     | N-M   |
| P5+      | N      | N     | (manual) |

Step 4: Guide beyond P4 (final optimization)

After P1-P4, explain remaining issues and how to resolve them:

Remaining issues for 100% compliance:

1. Body >500 lines (P5) — N skills
   → Requires content understanding to split into SKILL.md + references/
   → Recommended: Opus model with high effort
   → Run: /skills-upgrade --split  (interactive, one at a time)

2. Broken references — N skills
   → Referenced files in references/ don't exist
   → Fix: create the missing files or remove the broken links

3. Imperative form — N skills
   → Body uses "you should" instead of direct commands ("Run", "Check")
   → Fix: rewrite advisory phrasing to imperative

4. Orphan directories — N skills
   → Skill folders without SKILL.md entry point
   → Fix: add SKILL.md or restructure into parent skill

Would you like to start P5 splitting for the longest skills?

For P5 splitting, guide the user through each skill:

  1. Read the full content
  2. Identify logical sections that can become reference files
  3. Propose a split plan (what stays in SKILL.md, what moves to references/)
  4. Add progressive disclosure pointers linking to the new reference files
  5. Execute after user approval

Quick Reference

| # | Check | Weight | |---|-------|--------| | 1 | Frontmatter exists | 20% | | 2 | name: field valid | 8% | | 3 | description: field exists | 10% | | 4 | Description "Use when..." | 5% | | 5 | Description third-person | 3% | | 6 | Body ≤500 lines | 15% | | 7 | Directory structure | 10% | | 8 | disable-model-invocation | 8% | | 9 | No orphan directories | 5% | | 10 | No broken references | 5% | | 11 | Progressive Disclosure | 5% | | 12 | Imperative form | 6% |

See references/diagnostic-criteria.md for scoring details.

Model Guide

| Task | Model | Effort | |------|-------|--------| | Diagnosis | Any (bash) | N/A | | P1-P3 batch fix | Sonnet | medium | | P4 invocation control | Sonnet | medium | | P5 file splitting | Opus | high | | Full upgrade | Opus | high |

Real-World Impact

151 skills, measured results:

| Phase | Compliance | Gain | |-------|-----------|------| | Baseline | 62% | — | | After P1-P2 | 78% | +16%p | | After P1-P3 | 94.3% | +16.3%p | | After P1-P4 (est.) | ~97% | +2.7%p | | After P5+ (est.) | ~100% | +3%p |

Pre-Deployment Security Scan

Before publishing skills or pushing to GitHub, run the security scanner:

scripts/diagnose.sh  --security
scripts/diagnose.sh  --security --json

Detects 13 patterns across 3 severity levels:

| Severity | What it catches | |----------|----------------| | Critical | API keys (sk-, ntn_, ghp_), private key blocks | | High | Bearer tokens, API key/secret assignments, password assignments | | Medium | Hardcoded user paths (/home/user, /mnt/c/Users, C:\Users) |

False positives can occur when scanning code that contains detection patterns as string literals (e.g. the scanner's own source code). Review each finding before acting.

Common Mistakes

  • Editing without running diagnosis first
  • Skipping backup before upgrade
  • Putting workflow summary in description instead of triggers
  • Skipping P3 even though it has the highest aggregate impact
  • Running P5 with Sonnet instead of Opus (content understanding needed)
  • Forgetting to re-diagnose after fixes
  • Deploying without running --security scan first

See references/upgrade-actions.md for detailed P1-P7 procedures. See references/trigger-optimization.md for description optimization strategy.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.