Install
$ agentstack add skill-trogonstack-agentskills-eventmodeling-orchestrating-event-modeling ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Orchestrating Event Modeling
Coordinates the 9-step Event Modeling workflow. Each step delegates to a specialized skill — this skill holds the sequence, transition conditions, and what to carry forward between steps.
Interview Phase
Skip if: user has provided a clear domain description, requirements or scope, and stated output goal (code, design, learning, docs).
When interviewing, use AskUserQuestion:
- Domain — "What are you modeling? Describe the business process in 2-3
sentences."
- Requirements state — "(A) Written requirements/user stories, (B) Rough
ideas, (C) Existing system to reverse-engineer?"
- Goal — "(A) Learning event modeling, (B) Generate production code,
(C) Design validation, (D) Team documentation?"
- Constraints — "Any constraints? (timeline, external integrations, team
size, target language/framework)"
- Starting point — "Are you starting from scratch, or do you already have
outputs from earlier steps (event list, commands, scenarios)?"
Confirm understanding before proceeding: "So we're modeling [domain], goal is [goal], constraints are [constraints]. Starting from [step]. Does that match?"
Capture findings — write to .trogonai/interviews/[project-name]/EVENTMODELING.md:
# Event Modeling: [Project Name]
**Project**: [project-name]
**Started**: [ISO date]
**Goal**: [learning / production code / design validation / documentation]
**Constraints**: [timeline, integrations, team size, language]
## Interview Trail
| Step | Skill | Status | Key Output |
|------|-------|--------|------------|
| Orchestration | eventmodeling-orchestrating-event-modeling | Done | Domain scoped, starting point confirmed |
Update this file as each step completes.
Mid-Workflow Entry
If the user already has outputs from earlier steps, start from where they are. Ask which steps are complete and what artifacts exist. Do not re-run completed steps — pick up from the first incomplete step.
Workflow
Step 1: Brainstorm Events
Invoke eventmodeling-brainstorming-events.
Input: Domain requirements and any existing knowledge about the domain. Output to carry forward: Event list + Role Catalog. The Role Catalog (all human roles and system actors) feeds into every subsequent step. Gate: Do not proceed until the Role Catalog exists and events cover all known business processes.
Step 2: Plot Events
Invoke eventmodeling-plotting-events.
Input: Event list from Step 1. Output to carry forward: Chronological event timeline showing causal dependencies between events. Gate: Timeline should read as a coherent narrative before proceeding.
Step 3: Storyboard
Invoke eventmodeling-storyboarding-events.
Input: Event timeline + Role Catalog. Output to carry forward: UI mockups/wireframes with one swimlane per human role, showing what data each screen displays and collects. Gate: Every human role from the Role Catalog has at least one screen.
Step 4: Identify Inputs
Invoke eventmodeling-identifying-inputs.
Input: Storyboards + Role Catalog. Output to carry forward: Command definitions, each attributed to a specific role or system processor. Gate: Every UI action in the storyboards maps to a named command.
Step 5: Identify Outputs
Invoke eventmodeling-identifying-outputs.
Input: Event list + Commands from Step 4. Output to carry forward: Read model definitions — projections of events optimized for UI and processor queries. Gate: Every screen data need from the storyboards is satisfied by a read model.
Step 6: Apply Conway's Law
Invoke eventmodeling-applying-conways-law.
Input: Full event model so far (events, commands, read models). Output to carry forward: System swimlanes mapping events and commands to team boundaries. Gate: Each boundary can be independently owned by a team. Skip this step if Conway's Law boundaries are not relevant to the project.
Step 7: Elaborate Scenarios
Invoke eventmodeling-elaborating-scenarios.
Input: Commands and read models. Output to carry forward: Given-When-Then specifications for each command and view, including happy paths, validation failures, and edge cases. Gate: At least one scenario per command before proceeding.
Step 8: Check Completeness
Invoke eventmodeling-checking-completeness.
Input: Full model — events, commands, read models, scenarios, Role Catalog. Output to carry forward: Field traceability matrix confirming every field has an origin and a destination. List of any gaps found. Gate: All gaps resolved or explicitly accepted before proceeding.
Step 9: Validate
Invoke eventmodeling-validating-event-models.
Input: Complete event model. Output: Validation report with PASS / PASS WITH WARNINGS / FAIL verdict. Gate: PASS verdict before declaring the model ready for implementation.
If FAIL: address findings and re-invoke eventmodeling-validating-event-models.
Optional — Production Readiness Checklist: Invoke eventmodeling-validating-event-models-checklist when the model is destined for production. It runs 23 architectural checks across 7 phases and returns a PASS / PASS WITH WARNINGS / FAIL verdict independently of Step 9. A PASS on Step 9 does not substitute for this checklist when production readiness is required.
Final Output
A complete event model consisting of:
- Role Catalog (human roles and system actors with permissions)
- Chronological event timeline
- UI storyboards with role-based swimlanes
- Command definitions with actor attribution
- Read model designs
- System boundaries (if Conway's Law applied)
- Given-When-Then scenarios
- Completeness verification
- Validation report with readiness verdict
Optional Follow-on Skills
These skills are not part of the 9-step main path but extend the model for specific needs:
eventmodeling-designing-event-models— Use when stream identity,
per-command state shapes, or event causality need detailed design work. Can be applied at any step where those decisions arise, most commonly during or after Step 1.
eventmodeling-optimizing-stream-design— Use after the model is
complete to validate stream growth estimates and snapshotting decisions.
eventmodeling-translating-external-events— Use when external systems
(webhooks, IoT, third-party APIs) need to feed into the domain model.
eventmodeling-slicing-event-models— Use after Step 9 PASS to break
the model into independently deployable feature slices and plan parallel team implementation.
Quality Checklist
- [ ] All 9 modeling steps completed — no step skipped without explicit reason
- [ ] Role Catalog exists with named human roles and system processors
- [ ] Every command is attributed to a specific role from the Role Catalog
- [ ] Every read model satisfies at least one UI or processor query need
- [ ] At least one Given-When-Then scenario exists per command
- [ ] Completeness check shows no unresolved field traceability gaps
- [ ] Validation returns PASS or PASS WITH WARNINGS with all critical issues resolved
- [ ] Interview trail in
.trogonai/updated with status of each completed step
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: TrogonStack
- Source: TrogonStack/agentskills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.