AgentStack
SKILL unreviewed MIT Self-run

Skill Safety Verifier

skill-ttttstc-skill-safety-verifier-skill-safety-verifier · by ttttstc

|

No reviews yet
0 installs
3 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-ttttstc-skill-safety-verifier-skill-safety-verifier

Open-source listing — not yet scanned by AgentStack. Follow the source repository for install instructions.

Security review

⚠ Flagged

1 finding(s); flagged for manual review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures
  • high Dangerous shell/eval execution.

What it can access

  • Network access Used
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution Used
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution Used

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Skill Safety Verifier? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Skill Safety Verifier

> Security-first skill vetting for AI agents

Overview

Skill Safety Verifier 是一个安全优先的技能审查工具,用于在安装任何外部技能前进行安全检查。

Why This Matters

AI agents run with elevated permissions and can:

  • Execute arbitrary commands
  • Access file systems
  • Make network requests
  • Read environment variables

Unvetted skills = security risk


Workflow

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                        SKILL SAFETY VERIFIER FLOW                       │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

    User Request
         │
         ▼
┌─────────────────────┐
│  1. Fetch Skill    │
│  - Clone/Extract    │
│  - Read SKILL.md    │
└─────────────────────┘
         │
         ▼
┌─────────────────────┐
│  2. Parallel Scan  │
│  ┌───────────────┐  │
│  │ Socket Check  │  │  ← Check outbound connections
│  └───────────────┘  │
│  ┌───────────────┐  │
│  │ Vuln Scan     │  │  ← Query GitHub Advisory API
│  └───────────────┘  │
│  ┌───────────────┐  │
│  │ Code Patterns │  │  ← Scan dangerous functions
│  └───────────────┘  │
└─────────────────────┘
         │
         ▼
┌─────────────────────┐
│  3. Risk Score     │
│  - Calculate total │  ← Network + Vuln + Permission
│  - Classify level  │
└─────────────────────┘
         │
         ▼
┌─────────────────────┐
│  4. Present Result │
│  - Risk Radar      │
│  - Warnings       │
│  - Recommendation │
└─────────────────────┘
         │
         ▼
    User Decision

Core Responsibilities

1. Risk Assessment

Evaluate skills across three dimensions:

| Dimension | What to Check | Risk Level | |-----------|---------------|------------| | Socket/Network | Outbound connections, API calls | Critical | | Code Quality | Snyk vulnerabilities, dependencies | High | | Permissions | File access, command execution | High |

2. Red Flag Detection

Common suspicious patterns:

red_flags:
  network:
    - "Suspicious domain (non-standard TLD)"
    - "Hardcoded IP addresses"
    - "DNS lookups to unknown domains"
    - "Excessive outbound connections"
  
  execution:
    - "os.system() / subprocess without sanitization"
    - "eval() / exec() usage"
    - "Shell injection patterns"
    - "Download and execute code"
  
  data:
    - "Reading sensitive env vars"
    - "Exfiltrating files"
    - "Logging keystrokes"
    - "Credential harvesting"
  
  permissions:
    - "Overbroad file permissions"
    - "sudo/root without prompt"
    - "Full disk access requests"

3. Risk Classification

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    RISK CLASSIFICATION                      │
├──────────────┬──────────────┬─────────────────────────────┤
│    Level     │    Score     │        Action               │
├──────────────┼──────────────┼─────────────────────────────┤
│   🟢 Safe    │    0-10      │  Install & use freely       │
│   🟡 Low     │    11-30     │  Install with caution       │
│   🟠 Medium  │    31-60     │  Review code, then decide   │
│   🔴 High    │    61-100    │  Do not install            │
└──────────────┴──────────────┴─────────────────────────────┘

Assessment Criteria

Socket/Network Risk

| Alert Count | Risk Score | |-------------|------------| | 0 | 0 | | 1-2 | 10 | | 3-5 | 25 | | >5 | 50 |

Code/Vulnerability Risk

| Severity | Score | |----------|-------| | Critical | 25 | | High | 15 | | Medium | 10 | | Low | 5 |

GitHub Advisory API Integration

使用 GitHub Advisory API 获取真实漏洞数据,不阻塞安装流程。

API: https://api.github.com/advisories 认证: 无需 Token(匿名 60次/小时) TTL: 本地缓存 24 小时

流程:

1. 用户触发安装 → 立即返回 "安检中..."
2. 后台并行: 克隆代码 + 查缓存 + 异步请求 API
3. 缓存命中? Yes → 直接返回 | No → 等 API (超时 5s)
4. 合并 Socket分析 + 代码模式 + 漏洞数据 → 呈现

Permission Scope Risk

| Scope | Score | |-------|-------| | Read-only | 0 | | Network calls | 10 | | File write | 15 | | Command execution | 25 | | Full system access | 50 |


Workflow

User: "Install skill X"
         │
         ▼
┌─────────────────────┐
│  1. Fetch Skill    │
│  - Clone/Extract    │
│  - Read SKILL.md    │
└─────────────────────┘
         │
         ▼
┌─────────────────────┐
│  2. Security Scan  │
│  - Socket alerts    │
│  - Snyk vulnerabilities│
│  - Code patterns    │
└─────────────────────┘
         │
         ▼
┌─────────────────────┐
│  3. Risk Score     │
│  - Calculate total │
│  - Classify level  │
└─────────────────────┘
         │
         ▼
┌─────────────────────┐
│  4. Present Result │
│  - Risk level      │
│  - Warnings        │
│  - Recommendation  │
└─────────────────────┘
         │
         ▼
User Decision

Output Format

Progress Bar Style (Recommended)

✅ weather - Risk Assessment

┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  📊 Risk Radar                          │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  Network      [░░░░░░░░░░░]  0/50  🟢 │
│  Vulnerabil. [░░░░░░░░░░░░]  0/25  🟢 │
│  Permissions  [░░░░░░░░░░░░]  0/50  🟢 │
│  ─────────────────────────────────────  │
│  TOTAL        [░░░░░░░░░░░░]  0/100 🟢 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  Dependencies: curl, wttr.in            │
│  Recommendation: ✅ Safe to install     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘

Implementation Logic

# Progress bar rendering
def render_bar(score, max_score, label, width=10):
    percent = score / max_score
    filled = int(percent * width)
    bar = '█' * filled + '░' * (width - filled)
    emoji = get_risk_emoji(percent)
    return f"  {label:

# Example
skill-safety-check --source github.com/user/skill-repo

Post-Installation Verification

# Verify installed skill
skill-safety-check --verify --skill-name 

Interactive Mode

User: "Install jina-cli"
Agent: [Runs skill-safety-verifier]
→ Analyzes skill
→ Presents risk assessment
→ User decides

Integration

With ClawdHub

# Install with auto-verification
npx skills add  --verify

With OpenClaw

The verifier runs automatically before skill installation when enabled in config.


Configuration

Settings

# .openclaw/config.yaml
skill_safety:
  enabled: true
  auto_check: true
  block_high_risk: false  # Set true to auto-block
  scan_depth: full        # quick | full

Environment Variables

SKILL_SAFETY_LOG_LEVEL=info
SKILL_SAFETY_CACHE_TTL=3600

Best Practices

  1. Always verify - Never install unvetted skills
  2. Read the code - Automated checks aren't enough
  3. Least privilege - Only grant necessary permissions
  4. Isolate - Run high-risk skills in containers
  5. Monitor - Log all skill activity

Related


License

MIT License - See LICENSE file for details

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.