Adversarial Quality Loop
Use when a user explicitly requests an independent review, challenge pass, or second opinion on a rendered website or animation artifact. Produces one bounded evaluator report and evidence verdict; it never auto-starts another build pass.
Install
$ agentstack add skill-twk0672005-sentence-to-site-adversarial-quality-loop ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Links to your public security report.[](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-twk0672005-sentence-to-site-adversarial-quality-loop) Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Bounded Independent Review
This legacy-named skill is not a default quality loop. It is an optional, one-time independent review after a route has produced the required evidence.
Preconditions
- The user explicitly requested independent review, a challenge pass, or a second opinion.
- Acceptance criteria and current rendered evidence are available.
- Separate reviewers are available. If not, report that independent review is unavailable; do not simulate it as a solo role-play.
Run one review pass
- Give an independent Evaluator the acceptance criteria and rendered artifact only.
- Give an independent Evidence Auditor the selected route's evidence requirements and artifacts.
- Return the Evaluator's finite report plus the Auditor's
pass,partial, orblockedverdict. - Offer the user's choices: accept, reject, defer, or start a new explicitly scoped implementation task.
The Evaluator may identify one visible concern and one recommendation. Neither reviewer edits code, asks for another review round, or authorizes another build pass.
Stop condition
Stop after the report and verdict. A new implementation pass begins only through a new user decision, not because an agent wants to improve its own output.
Boundaries
- Self-critique does not count as independent review.
- A missing reviewer is
unavailable, not a reason to silently downgrade to solo review. - A
partialorblockedevidence verdict propagates to delivery; it does not trigger retry automation. - See [
../../references/quality-loop-roles.md](../../references/quality-loop-roles.md) for the bounded evaluator and auditor contracts.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: twk0672005
- Source: twk0672005/sentence-to-site
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.