AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Cdaf

skill-uditakhourii-cdaf-cdaf · by UditAkhourii

Read CDAF sidecar files (.cdaf) instead of processing video with vision. Use whenever a task involves understanding, summarizing, searching, editing, or selecting from video files (b-roll, raw clips, footage libraries) — check for a .cdaf sidecar FIRST before analyzing any video directly.

No reviews yet
0 installs
15 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-uditakhourii-cdaf-cdaf

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-uditakhourii-cdaf-cdaf)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
28d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Cdaf? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

CDAF — Cached Descriptive Asset Files

A .cdaf file is a timestamped, pre-computed description of a video, sitting next to it with the same basename (clip.mp4clip.cdaf). Reading it costs a few hundred text tokens; analyzing the video directly costs orders of magnitude more (~263 tokens per second of footage on Gemini-class models). Always prefer the sidecar when it is fresh.

Format spec and tooling: https://github.com/UditAkhourii/cdaf

The rule

Before analyzing ANY video file (.mp4, .mov, .mkv, .webm, .avi, .m4v):

  1. Check for a sidecar: same directory, same basename, .cdaf extension.
  2. Verify freshness before trusting it (see below). A stale sidecar describes an

older version of the video — using it is worse than not having one.

  1. If fresh: read the sidecar instead of processing the video. Use it as the

account of what the video contains — within the limits below.

  1. If missing or stale: generate one (see below) so the cost is paid once. If you

cannot generate, fall back to direct video analysis.

Verifying freshness

The sidecar header carries bytes (file size) and sha256 (content hash) of the exact video it describes. Verification never needs an API key or network access.

  • Cheap check (usually enough): compare the video's current file size to the

header's bytes value. Different size → provably stale.

  • Strict check: cdaf validate (exit 0 = fresh), or hash the file

yourself and compare to the header's sha256:

  • PowerShell: (Get-FileHash clip.mp4 -Algorithm SHA256).Hash.ToLower()
  • POSIX: sha256sum clip.mp4 / shasum -a 256 clip.mp4
  • Use the strict check when the decision is expensive to get wrong (publishing,

final edits); the cheap check suffices for exploration.

Reading a sidecar

It is plain UTF-8 text — use the Read tool directly, or cdaf read (which verifies the hash automatically and refuses to print a stale sidecar).

Format: a key: value header between --- CDAF/1.0 and ---, then markdown:

  • ## Summary — what the clip is
  • ## Segments[MM:SS.d-MM:SS.d] description lines covering the whole video

(see the trust note below before cutting on these timestamps)

  • ## Transcript — spoken words with timestamps (or (no speech))
  • ## On-screen Text — visible text with timestamps (or (none))
  • ## Tags — retrieval keywords

How much to trust a fresh sidecar

Freshness proves the sidecar describes these exact bytes. It does not prove the description is complete or correct — it is the record of one model's pass. Three limits matter when a mistake is expensive:

  • Timestamps are approximate. Boundaries inferred by a model drift (over a second

on measured clips), miss real cuts, and occasionally mark cuts that do not exist. They are fine for locating, ranking, and rough trims. Before cutting on them, verify against the container: ``bash ffmpeg -v error -i clip.mp4 -vf "select='gt(scene,0.1)',metadata=print:file=-" -f null - ` If the header carries x-shot-source: ffmpeg-scene-detect@...`, the boundaries were measured from the container and need no such check.

  • Descriptions can add, not just omit. Shown a whole video at once, a model may

narrate the outcome a clip implies but never shows — reporting that a task was completed when the footage only shows it being started. Such entries are fluent, specific, and indistinguishable from correct ones. Treat any claim that something was finished, fixed, repaired, or achieved as unverified: check the frames before relying on it, and say the sidecar is your source when you report it. An omission is a visible gap; an addition reads exactly like a fact.

  • Fine visual state is unreliable. Strike-through on a list, small or stylised text,

subtle motion, and similar details are often missed or reported at chance. If such a detail carries the meaning of the shot, look at the frame.

None of this argues for re-watching by default — that would forfeit the entire saving. Verify the specific claim your decision rests on, not the whole clip.

Generating sidecars

Needs Python ≥ 3.10 and a Gemini API key in GEMINI_API_KEY (free tier: https://aistudio.google.com/apikey). Install the CLI once:

pip install "cdaf[generate] @ git+https://github.com/UditAkhourii/cdaf.git#subdirectory=cli"

Then:

cdaf generate       # skips sidecars that are already fresh
cdaf generate  --force           # regenerate even if fresh
cdaf generate ./footage --detail rich   # brief | standard | rich

Generation calls a paid API and takes ~10s per clip. Ask the user before batch- generating a large library, and tell them roughly how many videos you are about to process.

Working across a footage library

  • Survey coverage: cdaf status lists every video as FRESH/STALE/MISSING.
  • To find footage matching a need ("sunset city shots"), grep the .cdaf files —

never open the videos: search *.cdaf for the relevant keywords, then rank by the Segments detail.

  • Batch-fill gaps: cdaf generate (fresh sidecars are skipped automatically).

What NOT to do

  • Do not treat a sidecar as fresh without at least the size check.
  • Do not invent visual details beyond what the sidecar states; if the task needs

information the sidecar lacks (exact colors, a specific frame), say so and fall back to targeted direct analysis of just the needed timestamp range.

  • Do not edit .cdaf files by hand to "update" them — the header hash would then

describe a video the body no longer matches. Regenerate with cdaf generate --force instead.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.