AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Llm Cost Advisor

skill-ulises-jeremias-agent-toolkit-llm-cost-advisor · by ulises-jeremias

WHAT — Recommend the most cost-effective LLM provider for a given task type. Shows estimated

No reviews yet
0 installs
16 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-ulises-jeremias-agent-toolkit-llm-cost-advisor

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-ulises-jeremias-agent-toolkit-llm-cost-advisor)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Llm Cost Advisor? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

LLM Cost Advisor (WHAT)

Recommend the right provider for the task at hand — balancing quality, cost, and privacy.

When to use

  • User asks "which model should I use for X?"
  • Before scheduling expensive loops (pr-babysitter, ci-sweeper)
  • When dev-companion jobs are unexpectedly expensive
  • When choosing between local and cloud providers for sensitive work

Out of scope

  • Does NOT configure providers — that's done via env vars and loadenv
  • Does NOT run LLM calls — it advises, the runner executes

Workflow

Step 1 — Check available providers:

devcompanion llm-status

Step 2 — Classify the task:

| Task type | Recommended tier | Why | |-----------|-----------------|-----| | Interactive code review, planning, debugging | Claude Sonnet / GPT-4o | Reasoning quality matters | | Batch labeling, summarization, triage | Claude Haiku / GPT-4o-mini | High volume, lower stakes | | Private/sensitive codebase work | Ollama or OpenCode | Stays local, zero cost | | Loop L1 (observation only) | Haiku / GPT-4o-mini | Low stakes, runs daily | | Loop L2 (PR creation) | Sonnet | Creates external artifacts | | Loop L3 (unattended) | Sonnet + verifier | Autonomous — quality critical |

Step 3 — Show cost estimate:

| Provider | Model | Est. per run | Monthly (1/day) | Monthly (96/day) | |----------|-------|-------------|-----------------|-----------------| | Anthropic | claude-3-5-sonnet | ~$0.05 | ~$1.50 | ~$144 | | Anthropic | claude-3-haiku | ~$0.005 | ~$0.15 | ~$14.40 | | OpenAI | gpt-4o | ~$0.04 | ~$1.20 | ~$115 | | OpenAI | gpt-4o-mini | ~$0.003 | ~$0.09 | ~$8.64 | | Ollama | (local) | $0 | $0 | $0 | | OpenCode | (local) | $0 | $0 | $0 |

Estimates based on ~2K input + ~1K output tokens per typical run.

Step 4 — Recommend with reasoning:

Give a clear recommendation: "For daily CNA issue triage (L1, observation only), use claude-3-haiku — ~$0.15/month vs $1.50/month for Sonnet, with no quality difference for labeling and summarization tasks."

Budget gate reminder

If the user is setting up loops, remind them to add limits.max_cost_usd to their job definitions to enable the runner's hard budget enforcement:

"limits": {
  "timeout_sec": 300,
  "max_cost_usd": 0.50
}

Anti-patterns

  • Do not recommend cloud providers for repos marked confidential — suggest Ollama/OpenCode
  • Do not recommend Haiku for L3 unattended loops — quality failures cascade
  • Do not skip the llm-status check — recommend only available providers

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.