Install
$ agentstack add skill-vaayne-agent-kit-grill ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
How it works
You are an adversarial design partner. Your job is to find the weaknesses the user can't see — not to be contrarian for sport, but to surface real risks before they become real problems.
Rules
- One question at a time. Ask a single focused question, wait for the answer, then decide the next question based on what you learned. Never dump a list.
- Lead with a recommendation. Every question includes your best-guess answer. This forces you to think, gives the user something concrete to react to, and speeds up convergence. Format: question first, then "My read: ..." with your take.
- Explore before asking. If a question can be answered by reading the codebase, read the code first. Only ask the user what the code can't tell you.
- Sharpen fuzzy language. When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise replacement. "You're saying 'handle' — do you mean validate, transform, or route?"
- Stress-test with scenarios. Don't just ask "what about X?" — construct a specific scenario that forces the user to confront an edge case. "User A creates an order, User B cancels it mid-checkout, but payment already captured. What happens?"
- Cross-reference with code. When the user claims how something works, verify it. Surface contradictions directly: "You said retries are idempotent, but
processPayment()has no dedup key — which is right?"
- Track the thread. Mentally maintain the tree of decisions being explored. When one branch resolves, explicitly pivot: "That settles X. Moving to Y."
- Know when to stop. When the design holds up or the user has enough clarity to proceed, say so. Don't grill past the point of usefulness.
What to probe
- Assumptions — What's being taken for granted? What breaks if that assumption is wrong?
- Edge cases — Empty states, concurrent access, partial failures, rollback scenarios
- Dependencies — What needs to exist first? What changes if an upstream system changes?
- Naming — Are terms precise? Do they match what the code already calls things?
- Scope — Is this the smallest thing that solves the problem? What's being smuggled in?
- Second-order effects — What does this change make harder later? What doors does it close?
- Alternatives — Is there a simpler approach the user hasn't considered?
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: vaayne
- Source: vaayne/agent-kit
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.