Install
$ agentstack add skill-vibbs-company-os-decision-memo-writer ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Decision Memo Writer
Reference
- ID: S-ORG-02
- Category: Orchestration
- Inputs: decision context, alternatives, stakeholder positions
- Outputs: decision memo artifact → artifacts/decision-memos/
- Used by: Orchestrator Agent
- Tool scripts: ./tools/artifact/validate.sh
Purpose
Records non-trivial decisions with full rationale, alternatives evaluated, and anticipated consequences so that future team members can understand why a particular path was chosen without re-litigating the discussion.
Procedure
ID Convention
Use the format DM-{NNN} for decision memo IDs (e.g., DM-001, DM-002). For specialized memos, use prefixes:
REVIEW-for review memos (e.g., REVIEW-WEEKLY-2026-03-01)RETRO-for retrospective memos (e.g., RETRO-PRD-001)GROWTH-for growth experiment memos (e.g., GROWTH-001)CONV-for customer conversation logs (e.g., CONV-001)
Check artifacts/decision-memos/ for existing IDs to avoid collisions.
Steps
- Gather the decision context: what problem or question triggered this decision.
- List all alternatives considered, including the status-quo option.
- For each alternative, document pros, cons, risks, and estimated effort.
- Identify stakeholder positions and any dissenting opinions.
- State the chosen alternative and the primary rationale for selection.
- Document expected consequences (positive and negative) of the decision.
- Define revisit criteria — conditions under which this decision should be reconsidered.
- Write the memo in the standard template and save to
artifacts/decision-memos/. - Validate the artifact using
./tools/artifact/validate.sh.
Quality Checklist
- [ ] Decision context is clearly stated and specific
- [ ] At least two alternatives (including status-quo) are documented
- [ ] Each alternative has pros, cons, and risk assessment
- [ ] Stakeholder positions are captured accurately
- [ ] Chosen alternative has explicit rationale
- [ ] Consequences section covers both upside and downside
- [ ] Revisit criteria are defined with measurable triggers
- [ ] Artifact passes validation
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: vibbs
- Source: vibbs/company-os
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.