AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Commit Trailers

skill-vibeeval-vibecosystem-commit-trailers · by vibeeval

Commit mesajlarina yapilandirilmis karar trailer'lari ekle. Constraint, Rejected, Confidence, Scope-risk, Not-tested trailer'lari ile karar baglamini koru.

No reviews yet
0 installs
19 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-vibeeval-vibecosystem-commit-trailers

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-vibeeval-vibecosystem-commit-trailers)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Commit Trailers? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Commit Trailers -- Structured Decision Context

Supplement conventional commits with structured trailers that preserve the reasoning behind a change. Future maintainers (and future agents) read commit history to understand not just what changed, but why a specific approach was taken.

Standard Trailers

Add these after the commit body, separated by a blank line, when they add value:

Constraint: 
Rejected: 
Confidence: high | medium | low  
Scope-risk: low | medium | high  
Not-tested: 

When to Use Each Trailer

| Trailer | When to Include | When to Skip | |---------|----------------|--------------| | Constraint | External limitation forced a non-obvious decision | No external constraints applied | | Rejected | A reasonable alternative was considered and discarded | Only one approach was viable | | Confidence | Correctness is uncertain or untested in key areas | Straightforward well-tested change | | Scope-risk | Change touches shared infrastructure, middleware, auth, or core data paths | Isolated, single-purpose change | | Not-tested | A gap in test coverage is intentional and known | All paths are tested |

Not every commit needs trailers. A fix: typo in error message needs none. A new auth middleware affecting every API call needs all five.


Trailer Reference

Constraint

An external limitation — browser API, hosting restriction, library limitation, business rule, or environment constraint — that ruled out the obvious solution.

Constraint: Safari 15 does not support the CSS :has() selector
Constraint: Redis unavailable in staging — in-memory fallback only
Constraint: Must stay on Node 18, no upgrade path in scope
Constraint: Third-party payment API does not support idempotency keys

Rejected

An alternative that was seriously considered. Helps future maintainers understand why the current approach exists instead of the simpler-looking one they are thinking of.

Rejected: Redux — too much boilerplate for this feature's scope
Rejected: JWT stored in localStorage — XSS exposure, using httpOnly cookie instead
Rejected: Direct DB query — bypasses cache layer, use repository instead
Rejected: Polling every 5s — too much server load, went with SSE instead

Confidence

Signal the quality of certainty around the correctness of the change. low should trigger a code review comment or discussion before merge.

Confidence: high
Confidence: medium — edge case with concurrent writes not covered by tests
Confidence: low — reversing this migration is complex, needs review before merge

Scope-risk

Signal how much of the system this change can affect if it is wrong. Helps reviewers and the team calibrate how carefully to review and test.

Scope-risk: low
Scope-risk: medium — touches payment processing, needs manual smoke test
Scope-risk: high — auth middleware change, every authenticated endpoint affected

Not-tested

Explicitly acknowledge a test gap. This is honest engineering, not an excuse. A named gap is better than an invisible one.

Not-tested: email delivery — no SMTP server in test environment
Not-tested: concurrent request behavior — requires load testing setup
Not-tested: Safari-specific rendering — no CI browser suite yet
Not-tested: DB rollback on payment failure — requires Stripe test mode setup

Full Example

feat: add rate limiting to API endpoints

Implement token bucket algorithm for /api/* routes.
Limits: 100 requests/min for free tier, 1000 for paid tier.
Exceeding the limit returns 429 with Retry-After header.

Constraint: Redis required for distributed rate limiting — in-memory does not work across multiple instances
Rejected: express-rate-limit — lacks per-user tier support without significant custom logic
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: medium — affects all /api/* routes, auth and webhook routes excluded
Not-tested: sustained 10K+ req/min behavior — requires dedicated load test environment

Format Rules

  • Trailers go AFTER the commit body, separated by a blank line
  • One trailer per line, no line wrapping
  • Rejected may appear multiple times (one per rejected alternative)
  • Only include trailers that add genuine value — avoid mechanical inclusion
  • Confidence: low is a signal for the team, not a reason to skip the commit
  • This format supplements, not replaces, the conventional commit type prefix

Integration with Other Rules

  • safety-and-quality.md defines the base commit format (: )
  • This rule adds optional trailers on top of that format
  • full-autonomy.md requires commit approval — trailers give Batuhan the context to approve confidently
  • Trailers are the commit-level equivalent of Priority Notes in the notepad system

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.