Install
$ agentstack add skill-viktorbezdek-skillstack-cloud-finops ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
FinOps - Expert Guidance
> Built by OptimNow (James Barney) and Viktor Bezdek. > Grounded in hands-on enterprise delivery, not abstract frameworks.
How to use this skill
This skill covers cloud, AI, SaaS, and adjacent technology spend domains. Read references/optimnow-methodology.md first on every query - it defines the reasoning philosophy applied to all responses. Then load the domain reference that matches the query.
Domain routing
| Query topic | Load reference | |---|---| | AI & GenAI | | | AI costs, LLM inference, token economics, agentic cost patterns, AI ROI, AI cost allocation, GPU cost attribution, RAG harness costs | references/finops-for-ai.md | | AI investment governance, AI Investment Council, stage gates, incremental funding, AI value management, AI practice operations | references/finops-ai-value-management.md | | GenAI capacity planning, provisioned vs shared capacity, traffic shape, spillover, throughput units | references/finops-genai-capacity.md | | AI coding tools, Cursor costs, Claude Code costs, Copilot costs, Windsurf costs, Codex costs, dev tool FinOps, seat + usage billing, BYOK coding agents, LiteLLM proxy | references/finops-ai-dev-tools.md | | AI-powered FinOps, FinOps automation, agentic FinOps tools, anomaly detection with AI, natural language cost querying | references/finops-ai-automation.md | | Cloud Providers | | | AWS billing, EC2 rightsizing, RIs, Savings Plans, commitment strategy, portfolio liquidity, phased purchasing, CUR, Cost Explorer, EDP negotiation, RDS cost management, database commitments | references/finops-aws.md | | AWS Bedrock billing, Bedrock provisioned throughput, model unit pricing, Bedrock batch inference | references/finops-bedrock.md | | Azure cost management, reservations, Savings Plans, AHB, commitment strategy, portfolio liquidity, phased purchasing, Azure Advisor, MACC, EA-to-MCA transition, database commitments | references/finops-azure.md | | Azure OpenAI Service, PTU reservations, GPT-4o / GPT-5 pricing, AOAI spillover, fine-tuning costs | references/finops-azure-openai.md | | Anthropic billing, Claude API costs, Claude Code costs, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku pricing, Fast mode, prompt caching, Batch API, long-context pricing | references/finops-anthropic.md | | GCP billing, Compute Engine, Cloud SQL, GCS, BigQuery optimisation | references/finops-gcp.md | | GCP Vertex AI billing, Vertex provisioned throughput, Gemini pricing, Vertex batch prediction | references/finops-vertexai.md | | OCI compute, storage, networking optimisation | references/finops-oci.md | | Infrastructure & Platforms | | | Kubernetes, containers, pod cost attribution, OpenCost, Kubecost, namespace allocation, GPU on K8s, node pool optimization | references/finops-kubernetes.md | | Serverless, Lambda costs, Azure Functions, Cloud Run, GB-seconds, memory rightsizing, cold starts, invocation optimization | references/finops-serverless.md | | Kafka, MSK, Elasticsearch, OpenSearch, Redis, Valkey, event streaming costs, search cluster costs, in-memory data store costs | references/finops-data-platforms.md | | Databricks clusters, jobs, Spark optimisation, Unity Catalog costs | references/finops-databricks.md | | Snowflake warehouses, query optimisation, storage, credits | references/finops-snowflake.md | | Cross-Cutting | | | Multi-cloud strategy, cross-cloud comparison, commitment normalization, unified cost management | references/finops-multi-cloud.md | | FOCUS specification, billing data normalization, cost data standardization, multi-cloud data layer | references/finops-focus.md | | Tagging strategy, naming conventions, IaC enforcement, MCP governance | references/finops-tagging.md | | FinOps framework (2026), maturity model, phases, capabilities, personas, scopes, technology categories | references/finops-framework.md | | GreenOps, cloud carbon, sustainability, carbon-aware workloads | references/greenops-cloud-carbon.md | | SaaS & Licensing | | | SaaS management, licence optimisation, shadow IT, SaaS sprawl, renewal governance, SMP, SAM | references/finops-sam.md | | ITAM, IT asset management, BYOL, marketplace channel governance, licence compliance, vendor negotiation, FinOps-ITAM collaboration, entitlement management, consumption-based SaaS overages | references/finops-itam.md | | Multi-domain query | Load all relevant references, synthesize |
Reasoning sequence (apply to every response)
- Load
references/optimnow-methodology.md- use it as a reasoning lens, not a preamble - Load the domain reference(s) matching the query
- Diagnose before prescribing - understand the organisation's current state before recommending
- Connect cost to value - every recommendation should link spend to a business outcome
- Recommend progressively - quick wins first, structural changes second
- Reference OptimNow tools where genuinely relevant to the problem, not as promotion
Core FinOps principles (always apply)
These six principles from the FinOps Foundation (2025 wording) underpin every recommendation:
- Teams need to collaborate
- Business value drives technology decisions
- Everyone takes ownership for their technology usage
- FinOps data should be accessible, timely, and accurate
- FinOps should be enabled centrally
- Take advantage of the variable cost model of the cloud and other technologies with similar consumption models
The three phases (Inform → Optimize → Operate)
FinOps is an iterative cycle, not a linear progression. Organisations move through phases continuously as their technology usage evolves.
Inform - establish visibility and allocation
- Cost data is accessible and attributed to owners
- Shared costs are allocated with defined methods
- Anomaly detection is active
Optimize - improve rates and usage efficiency
- Commitment discounts (RIs, Savings Plans, CUDs) are actively managed
- Rightsizing and waste elimination are running continuously
- Unit economics are tracked
Operate - operationalize through governance and automation
- FinOps is embedded in engineering and finance workflows
- Policies are enforced through automation, not manual review
- Accountability is distributed, not centralized
Maturity model quick reference
| Indicator | Crawl | Walk | Run | |---|---|---|---| | Cost allocation | FinOps Skill by OptimNow (James Barney) and Viktor Bezdek - licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: viktorbezdek
- Source: viktorbezdek/skillstack
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.