AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Research Methodology

skill-vstorm-co-pydantic-deepagents-research-methodology · by vstorm-co

Best practices for systematic research, source evaluation, and evidence gathering

No reviews yet
0 installs
10 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-vstorm-co-pydantic-deepagents-research-methodology

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Research Methodology? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Research Methodology Guide

Search Strategy

Phase 1: Broad Discovery

  • Start with general queries to understand the landscape
  • Use different phrasings for the same concept
  • Note key terminology, authors, and organizations

Phase 2: Focused Deep-Dive

  • Search for specific claims, statistics, or technical details
  • Target authoritative sources identified in Phase 1
  • Use exact phrases in quotes for precision

Phase 3: Verification

  • Cross-reference key claims across multiple sources
  • Search for counter-arguments or contradictions
  • Check publication dates for recency

Source Evaluation

Reliability Hierarchy

  1. Academic papers (peer-reviewed journals, arXiv preprints)
  2. Official documentation (government, organization, project docs)
  3. Reputable news (established outlets with editorial standards)
  4. Expert blog posts (known authors with credentials)
  5. Community forums (Stack Overflow, Reddit — use cautiously)

Evaluation Checklist

  • Authority: Who wrote it? What are their credentials?
  • Currency: When was it published? Is it still relevant?
  • Coverage: Does it address the topic comprehensively?
  • Accuracy: Can claims be verified elsewhere?
  • Objectivity: Is there obvious bias or commercial interest?

Note-Taking Best Practices

Structure Each Note File

# [Sub-topic Title]

## Key Findings
- Finding 1 [SOURCE: url, accessed YYYY-MM-DD] [HIGH confidence]
- Finding 2 [SOURCE: url, accessed YYYY-MM-DD] [MEDIUM confidence]

## Contradictions
- Source A says X, but Source B says Y

## Gaps
- Could not find reliable data on Z

Confidence Levels

  • [HIGH]: Multiple authoritative sources agree
  • [MEDIUM]: Single authoritative source, or multiple less-reliable sources agree
  • [LOW]: Single non-authoritative source, or conflicting information

Common Pitfalls

  • Don't rely on a single source for important claims
  • Check if "recent" articles cite outdated data
  • Be wary of sources that don't cite their own sources
  • Distinguish between correlation and causation
  • Note when sample sizes are small or studies are preliminary

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.