AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Text Mining Guide

skill-wentorai-research-plugins-text-mining-guide · by wentorai

Apply NLP and text mining techniques to research text data

No reviews yet
0 installs
10 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-wentorai-research-plugins-text-mining-guide

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Text Mining Guide? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Text Mining Guide

A skill for applying natural language processing (NLP) and text mining techniques to research data. Covers text preprocessing, feature extraction, topic modeling, sentiment analysis, and named entity recognition for analyzing surveys, abstracts, social media, and document corpora.

Text Preprocessing Pipeline

Standard Cleaning Steps

import re
from collections import Counter

def preprocess_text(text: str, lowercase: bool = True,
                    remove_numbers: bool = False,
                    min_word_length: int = 2) -> list[str]:
    """
    Preprocess text for NLP analysis.

    Args:
        text: Raw input text
        lowercase: Convert to lowercase
        remove_numbers: Remove numeric tokens
        min_word_length: Minimum token length to keep
    """
    if lowercase:
        text = text.lower()

    # Remove URLs
    text = re.sub(r"http\S+|www\.\S+", "", text)

    # Remove HTML tags
    text = re.sub(r"]+>", "", text)

    # Remove special characters (keep apostrophes for contractions)
    text = re.sub(r"[^a-zA-Z0-9\s']", " ", text)

    # Tokenize
    tokens = text.split()

    if remove_numbers:
        tokens = [t for t in tokens if not t.isdigit()]

    # Remove short tokens
    tokens = [t for t in tokens if len(t) >= min_word_length]

    return tokens

def remove_stopwords(tokens: list[str],
                     custom_stopwords: list[str] = None) -> list[str]:
    """
    Remove stopwords from token list.
    """
    # Minimal English stopwords (extend as needed)
    default_stops = {
        "the", "a", "an", "and", "or", "but", "in", "on", "at",
        "to", "for", "of", "with", "by", "is", "was", "are", "were",
        "be", "been", "being", "have", "has", "had", "do", "does",
        "did", "will", "would", "could", "should", "may", "might",
        "this", "that", "these", "those", "it", "its", "not", "no"
    }

    if custom_stopwords:
        default_stops.update(custom_stopwords)

    return [t for t in tokens if t not in default_stops]

Document-Term Matrix

from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfVectorizer

def build_tfidf_matrix(documents: list[str],
                       max_features: int = 5000) -> dict:
    """
    Build a TF-IDF document-term matrix.

    Args:
        documents: List of document strings
        max_features: Maximum vocabulary size
    """
    vectorizer = TfidfVectorizer(
        max_features=max_features,
        stop_words="english",
        min_df=2,           # Appear in at least 2 documents
        max_df=0.95,        # Ignore terms in >95% of documents
        ngram_range=(1, 2)  # Unigrams and bigrams
    )

    tfidf_matrix = vectorizer.fit_transform(documents)

    return {
        "matrix_shape": tfidf_matrix.shape,
        "vocabulary_size": len(vectorizer.vocabulary_),
        "top_terms": sorted(
            vectorizer.vocabulary_.items(),
            key=lambda x: x[1]
        )[:20],
        "vectorizer": vectorizer,
        "matrix": tfidf_matrix
    }

Topic Modeling

Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA)

from sklearn.decomposition import LatentDirichletAllocation

def run_topic_model(tfidf_matrix, vectorizer,
                    n_topics: int = 10) -> list[dict]:
    """
    Run LDA topic modeling on a document-term matrix.

    Args:
        tfidf_matrix: Sparse TF-IDF matrix
        vectorizer: Fitted TfidfVectorizer
        n_topics: Number of topics to extract
    """
    lda = LatentDirichletAllocation(
        n_components=n_topics,
        random_state=42,
        max_iter=50,
        learning_method="online"
    )
    lda.fit(tfidf_matrix)

    feature_names = vectorizer.get_feature_names_out()
    topics = []

    for idx, topic_weights in enumerate(lda.components_):
        top_indices = topic_weights.argsort()[-10:][::-1]
        top_words = [feature_names[i] for i in top_indices]
        topics.append({
            "topic_id": idx,
            "top_words": top_words,
            "label": "Assign a human-readable label based on top words"
        })

    return topics

Choosing the Number of Topics

Methods for selecting k (number of topics):
  - Coherence score: Higher is better (use gensim's CoherenceModel)
  - Perplexity: Lower is better (but can overfit)
  - Human judgment: Do topics make interpretive sense?
  - Domain knowledge: Expected number of themes in the corpus

Practical advice:
  - Start with k = 5, 10, 15, 20 and compare
  - Examine top words for each k -- look for coherent themes
  - If topics are too broad, increase k
  - If topics overlap heavily, decrease k

Sentiment Analysis

Lexicon-Based Approach

def simple_sentiment(text: str, positive_words: set,
                     negative_words: set) -> dict:
    """
    Basic lexicon-based sentiment scoring.

    Args:
        text: Input text
        positive_words: Set of positive sentiment words
        negative_words: Set of negative sentiment words
    """
    tokens = text.lower().split()

    pos_count = sum(1 for t in tokens if t in positive_words)
    neg_count = sum(1 for t in tokens if t in negative_words)
    total = len(tokens)

    score = (pos_count - neg_count) / max(total, 1)

    return {
        "positive_count": pos_count,
        "negative_count": neg_count,
        "score": score,
        "label": (
            "positive" if score > 0.05
            else "negative" if score < -0.05
            else "neutral"
        )
    }

Research Applications

Common Text Mining Tasks in Research

| Task | Method | Application | |------|--------|-------------| | Literature mapping | Topic modeling | Identify research themes in a corpus of abstracts | | Survey analysis | Thematic coding + sentiment | Analyze open-ended survey responses | | Social media analysis | NER + sentiment | Track public discourse on a topic | | Content analysis | Classification + keyword extraction | Code qualitative data at scale | | Bibliometrics | Co-word analysis | Map intellectual structure of a field |

Validation and Reporting

Always validate text mining results against human judgment. Report preprocessing steps, parameter choices (e.g., number of topics, mindf, maxdf), and model evaluation metrics. For topic models, include the top 10-15 words per topic and representative documents. For classification, report precision, recall, and F1 on a held-out test set. Acknowledge that automated text analysis supplements but does not replace close reading.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.