Job Search

job-search (family search member)

Find real job openings across every tier that matters, then score each one with a deterministic rubric so the user has a defensible numeric reason to pursue or skip — not a hand-waved tag. This is the search member of the job-hunter family.

When to use this skill

Use this skill when the user wants to find or score job postings:

• "Find me senior backend engineer roles in Seattle, $180k+"
• "What jobs match my resume?"
• "Look for openings near me, I'm a marketing manager"
• "Search local jobs in Austin for a data analyst"
• "Find companies hiring software engineers in Boston"
• "Score this posting for me" / "Is this posting legit or a ghost job?"
• "Find remote DevOps jobs that pay at least $150k"

Do not use this skill for tailoring or optimizing a resume against a posting (use resume-tailor), setting up the North-Star profile or parsing a resume (use career-profile), tracking applications or drafting follow-ups (use application-tracker), or harvesting lessons from outcomes (use outcome-learning). For an end-to-end hunt that spans several of these, the job-hunter orchestrator routes across the family.

Inputs (workspace contract)

This member reads upstream artifacts if present and degrades gracefully if absent, so it also works standalone:

• .job-hunter-profile.md (North-Star profile, produced by career-profile):

if present, run the profile's deal-breakers, company-size, and mission-vs-comp answers into the scoring below. If absent, score on the explicit search criteria the user gives you (role, location, comp). Do not fabricate a profile.

• .job-hunter/REJECTED_IDEAS.md and .job-hunter/LESSONS.md (if a

workspace exists): treat REJECTED_IDEAS entries as hard filters and let confirmed LESSONS adjust how you grade the five sub-scores. Lessons never change the weights in score_posting.py — those stay constant.

Produces a scored postings.json per the family workspace contract (cv_match, comp_vs_target, cultural_signals, posting_legitimacy, red_flags_penalty, plus weighted_global and recommendation), which resume-tailor and application-tracker consume downstream.

Phase: Search for Jobs (4 tiers)

Use web search to cast the widest possible net across major boards, niche sites, local sources, and direct company pages. Many of the best opportunities, especially at smaller or regional companies, never appear on LinkedIn or Indeed. A thorough search covers all four tiers below.

Build the query set first. Run scripts/build_search_queries.py to generate a deterministic list of queries across all four tiers given the user's role, location, industry, and any target companies:

python scripts/build_search_queries.py --role "data engineer" --location "Austin, TX" --industry tech

This avoids ad-hoc query construction and ensures each tier gets the right number of distinct queries. Use the output as your search plan; when results are thin, expand with scripts/expand_role_synonyms.py "" (covers 80+ roles with synonyms and adjacent titles) and re-run the query builder against each synonym.

Tier 1 — Major job boards (always): LinkedIn, Indeed, Glassdoor, ZipRecruiter. These have the most volume. Always include a broad non-site-specific query (e.g., "[role]" "[location]" job posting 2026) as a fallback for when site: queries are blocked.

Tier 2 — Industry and niche boards: The board to use depends on the user's industry. See [references/niche-boards-by-industry.md](references/niche-boards-by-industry.md) for the full registry across tech, healthcare, finance, marketing/media, government, nonprofits, education, trades, and legal. Only search the boards relevant to the user's field; don't pad with every board.

Tier 3 — Local and regional sources: This tier catches jobs that never reach national boards. Includes state workforce commission portals (see [references/state-workforce-commissions.md](references/state-workforce-commissions.md) for the 50-state + DC registry), city and county job boards, local newspapers and business journals, chambers of commerce, regional industry groups, Craigslist, and university career centers. The query builder generates a starter set for each of these for the user's specific location.

Tier 4 — Direct company career pages: Some of the best matches come from going straight to employers. If the user has target companies in mind, pass them via --companies. Otherwise search largest employers [city] or top [industry] companies [city] and check their career pages individually.

General search principles:

• Run multiple targeted searches across all relevant tiers rather than one broad one.
• Aim for 10+ unique postings total, ideally from a mix of sources (not all LinkedIn).
• Fallbacks: If site-specific searches return thin results (some sites block

site: queries), switch to broader queries. If a whole tier is empty, try harder on the others and tell the user what you tried.

• Freshness: Prefer postings from the last 30 days. If a result looks stale

(no date, or clearly months old), skip it unless pickings are slim, and flag the age if you include it.

• Deduplication: The same job often appears on multiple boards. After

collection, run scripts/dedupe_postings.py over the gathered postings to collapse duplicates by company + title + location. The script prefers the most direct URL (company career page > aggregator > LinkedIn-style mirror) and preserves the other sources under also_seen_on so the user can see breadth without seeing repeats.

For each posting, extract: job title; company name; a one-line company blurb (industry, approximate size, anything notable); location (or remote status); salary range (if listed); date posted (if available); source (where it was found, e.g., "LinkedIn", "Austin Business Journal", "Company career page", "Texas Workforce Commission"); direct URL; and a 2-3 sentence summary of the role and key requirements.

Two orthogonal axes — score them separately:

• Match quality: does the role fit the user's background? Full rubric

(red-flag catalog with severity gradations, 1-5 cv_match criteria, when to drop a posting vs flag it, salary-vs-market sanity check) in [references/match-quality-rubric.md](references/match-quality-rubric.md). Use scripts/normalize_salary.py to parse posting salary strings into comparable numbers before filtering against the user's comp floor or computing market medians.

• Posting legitimacy: is the posting real and active? Three-tier confidence

scale (High Confidence / Proceed with Caution / Suspicious) with signals for age, repost patterns, apply-button quality, employer disclosure, salary transparency, and company activity. See [references/posting-legitimacy-rubric.md](references/posting-legitimacy-rubric.md). This is the ghost-job axis; treat it as independent from match quality so a 5/5 match on a likely-fake posting still scores low.

Surface red flags inline in each posting card and feed severe red flags (SSN pre-offer, pays only in equity, typosquatting) into the red_flags_penalty multiplier rather than just displaying them.

Phase 2.5: Deterministic scoring

After triaging each posting, fill in five 1-5 sub-scores (cv_match, comp_vs_target, cultural_signals, posting_legitimacy, plus a 0-1 red_flags_penalty if applicable) and run scripts/score_posting.py to produce a weighted global score and a recommendation (apply / apply_if_specific_reason / skip):

python scripts/score_posting.py --sub-scores '{"cv_match": 4.5, "comp_vs_target": 4.5, "cultural_signals": 4.0, "posting_legitimacy": 5.0, "red_flags_penalty": 0.0}'

or batch via --sub-scores-file scored.json (a JSON array of sub-score objects).

The five sub-scores:

• cv_match — how well the posting fits the user's resume/profile. This is

the heaviest weight because it is the single most predictive signal of whether the application reaches a human.

• comp_vs_target — compensation vs the user's target (use

normalize_salary.py first).

• cultural_signals — culture/values fit signals.
• posting_legitimacy — is it a real, active opening (the ghost-job axis).
• red_flags_penalty — a 0-1 multiplier applied to the weighted additive

score. A single severe red flag (e.g., pays only in equity at 0.5) can torpedo an otherwise strong score. This is the discipline that prevents "everything is a 4" inflation; red flags multiply, they do not subtract.

The weights are documented inline in the script and held constant. Recommendation bands: >= 4.0 -> apply; 3.5-3.99 -> apply_if_specific_reason; skip. See tests/testscoreposting.py` for the load-bearing semantic tests around weight intent (cv_match heaviest, red-flag-torpedoes, and the career-ops Block G thresholds).

Write the scored postings to postings.json (the family workspace artifact) so downstream members can consume them. Each posting carries the five sub-scores plus weighted_global and recommendation.

Output: presenting links

Job links need to be clickable in the user's environment, and most chat UIs do not auto-link bare URLs inside long responses. Present the postings as a rendered HTML file saved to the workspace folder so every link is a real anchor. Bare-URL text in chat is a fallback only if HTML output is unavailable. The HTML should show each job as a card/row with title (linked), company + blurb, location, salary, date, source, summary, a recommendation/score badge, and any red flags; offer filters by recommendation bucket and source type; sort by weighted_global descending by default; include a count header; and include a "Sources searched" summary at the bottom (even tiers that returned nothing) so the user sees the breadth of the search.

Handling thin or suspicious results

• Few results: don't present 3 mediocre results and call it done. Try

alternative titles via expand_role_synonyms.py, broaden the location, or check different boards. Tell the user what you tried.

• Can't fetch a posting page: some sites block scraping. Include the link so

the user can read it, and note that scoring is best-effort without the full JD.

• Suspicious posting: rate it low on posting_legitimacy (independent of

match quality), cite the specific ghost-job signals, and recommend skip / proceed-with-caution rather than padding the result set.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

• Author: wexxwuther
• Source: wexxwuther/job-hunter
• License: MIT
• Homepage: https://gdkdigital.com

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.