Install
$ agentstack add skill-wilbeibi-wilbeibi-skills-grill-me ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
grill-me
Relentlessly interview the user about a plan or design until you both reach shared understanding and every open decision is resolved.
How to run it
- Read the plan, linked docs, code, or local files needed to understand the topic first.
- Ask one question at a time. Wait for the answer before the next question.
- For each question, state your recommended answer and a one-line why.
- Walk each branch of the decision tree. When an answer opens new questions, follow them; resolve dependencies between decisions in order rather than jumping around.
- If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore instead of asking.
- Push on fuzzy words, hidden assumptions, edge cases, dependencies between decisions, and reversibility.
- Keep going until no unresolved branch remains. Then summarize the agreed plan.
Question patterns
- "What outcome would make this change a success?"
- "Which existing concept owns this behavior?"
- "What is the smallest scenario that proves the design works?"
- "What breaks if this assumption is false?"
- "What would a future maintainer be tempted to change back?"
- "Which term should be canonical, and which aliases should be avoided?"
Capturing decisions
Only when the repo already keeps CONTEXT.md, CONTEXT-MAP.md, or docs/adr/, or the interview resolves terminology or a decision worth outliving the conversation. Check for those files before proposing new ones.
- Update the appropriate
CONTEXT.mdas soon as terminology is resolved — it is a glossary and relationship map for project-specific language, not a spec or scratchpad. - Use
CONTEXT-MAP.mdonly when the repository has multiple bounded contexts. - Offer an ADR only for decisions that are hard to reverse, surprising without context, and based on a real tradeoff.
- Create docs lazily: no
CONTEXT.mdordocs/adr/until there is real resolved content, and keep them short enough that future agents actually read them.
For glossary format, read [CONTEXT-FORMAT.md](CONTEXT-FORMAT.md). For ADR format and thresholds, read [ADR-FORMAT.md](ADR-FORMAT.md).
Notes
- Do not soften or batch questions to "be efficient" — the value is the relentlessness. One question, one recommendation, repeat.
- Stop early only if the user explicitly says to stop or accepts all remaining recommendations at once.
- Ported from mattpocock/skills (MIT), adapted to this repo's conventions and voice.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: wilbeibi
- Source: wilbeibi/wilbeibi-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.