Install
$ agentstack add skill-williamwjhuang-ab-test-causal-inference-skills-good-skill ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Statistical Analysis Guide
Overview
This skill guides the agent through proper statistical hypothesis testing, ensuring normality checks, appropriate test selection, effect size reporting, and multiple comparison corrections.
When to Use
Use this skill when the user wants to:
- Compare two or more groups statistically
- Test a hypothesis about differences or relationships
- Determine if an observed effect is statistically significant
Decision Tree
IF comparing two groups:
IF data is normal (Shapiro-Wilk p > 0.05) AND variances are equal:
→ Use independent samples t-test
ELIF data is normal but variances unequal:
→ Use Welch's t-test
ELSE (data is non-normal):
→ Use Mann-Whitney U test
→ Consider bootstrap confidence intervals
IF comparing 3+ groups:
IF data is normal AND variances are homogeneous:
→ Use one-way ANOVA with post-hoc (Tukey HSD)
ELSE:
→ Use Kruskal-Wallis test
→ Post-hoc: Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction
Guardrails
- REFUSE to report only p-values. Always include effect size (Cohen's d,
eta-squared, or odds ratio) and confidence intervals.
- REFUSE to approve an experiment without power analysis showing power ≥ 80%.
- WARN if multiple comparisons are performed without correction (Bonferroni,
Benjamini-Hochberg, or Holm).
- MUST NOT claim statistical significance without reporting the full context.
Output Format
Always report results in this structure:
Test: [test name]
Effect Size: [metric] = [value] ([interpretation])
95% CI: [lower, upper]
p-value: [value] (adjusted: [method])
Power: [value]
Assumptions checked: [list]
Edge Cases
- Small samples (n < 30): Use exact tests or bootstrap methods
- Tied data: Use appropriate tie-correction for rank-based tests
- What if normality is borderline?: Report both parametric and non-parametric results
Common Mistakes
- Using paired tests for independent samples (anti-pattern)
- Reporting "trending toward significance" for p = 0.06 (do not use for this)
- Cherry-picking seeds for reproducibility — report mean ± std across multiple seeds
Escape Hatch
Experienced users can override guardrails by explicitly stating: "I acknowledge [specific guardrail] and am proceeding because [justification]."
References
For detailed method guides, see the references/ directory.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: WilliamWJHuang
- Source: WilliamWJHuang/ab-test-causal-inference-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.