Install
$ agentstack add skill-womendefiningai-claude-code-skills-feature-orchestrator ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Feature Orchestrator Skill
🚨 CRITICAL: This Skill Runs BEFORE Feature Implementation
Purpose: Enforce research-backed CI/CD workflow, prevent code duplication, ensure incremental delivery
When to invoke: Automatically when user requests implementing ANY new feature, component, or functionality
Auto-invoke triggers:
- "implement X feature"
- "add Y functionality"
- "build Z component"
- "create new X"
- "develop X feature"
What this skill does NOT apply to:
- Bug fixes ( "Incremental delivery enables organizations to have greater visibility, decreases risks faster, delivers value sooner."
Continuous Integration (Harness.io, 2024): > "Small problems are easier to fix than big problems, and frequent commits make bugs easier to identify."
Code Review (Microsoft Research): > "Reviewing 200–400 lines of code at a time detects up to 90% of defects."
DRY Principle (MetriDev, 2024): > "Abstraction and modularity prevent code duplication through identifying common patterns for reuse."
For complete research citations and detailed procedures: See REFERENCE.md
🎯 Four-Phase Workflow
Overview
| Phase | Purpose | Time | Output | |-------|---------|------|--------| | 1. Gap Analysis | Search for existing code | 2-3 min | Reuse opportunities identified | | 2. Planning | Break into increments | 3-5 min | Implementation plan with todos | | 3. Review Gate | Agent quality review | 1-2 min | Feedback incorporated | | 4. Execution | Build incrementally | Varies | Feature complete, tests passing |
Phase 1: Gap Analysis (MANDATORY)
Purpose: Search for existing implementations BEFORE writing any code
Research: DRY principle - 100 | Invoke critic-agent | | Security critical | Auth, payments | Always review | | User-facing UI | Any | Invoke ui-ux-designer | | Simple addition | 20 lines → data files
- Performance: React.memo() for animations, expensive components
- Imports: No file extensions, use path aliases (@/...)
- Accessibility: WCAG 2.1 AA compliance
File Size Monitoring:
# Check before editing
./scripts/check-file-size.sh [file-path]
# Thresholds:
# 150-200 lines → ⚠️ Plan extraction
# 200-300 lines → 🚨 Extract before adding
# 300+ lines → 🛑 MUST refactor first
Detailed procedures: See REFERENCE.md → Phase 4
Verification (per increment):
- [ ] Implemented ONLY this increment's scope?
- [ ] All tests passing?
- [ ] Todo marked completed?
🔄 Complete Workflow Example
See EXAMPLES.md for:
- Complete auth system implementation (2.5 hours)
- Simple feature addition (5 minutes)
- Gap analysis preventing duplication
- Review gate catching security issues
🎯 Integration with CLAUDE.md Rules
This skill enforces ALL mandatory CLAUDE.md rules:
- ✅ Search for existing code FIRST (Phase 1: Gap Analysis)
- ✅ Plan before implementing (Phase 2: Implementation Planning)
- ✅ Incremental implementation (Phase 4: Never break the build)
- ✅ Test between increments (Phase 4: lint + type-check + test)
- ✅ React.memo() for performance (Phase 4: Code quality rules)
- ✅ Coordinate agents (Phase 3: Review gate)
- ✅ TodoWrite tracking (Phase 2 + Phase 4)
- ✅ Component size limits (Phase 4: File size monitoring)
🚨 Anti-Patterns This Skill Prevents
❌ What NOT to Do:
- Starting without gap analysis → Skill forces search first
- No implementation plan → Skill requires incremental plan
- Large commits → Skill enforces small increments
- Breaking the build → Skill tests after each increment
- Skipping code review → Skill invokes agents automatically
- Giant components (>300 lines) → Skill monitors file size
- Missing optimization → Skill checks React.memo(), etc.
📋 Verification Checklist (Before Completing)
Before marking feature complete, verify:
- [ ] Phase 1: Gap analysis completed?
- [ ] Phase 1: Existing code reused where possible?
- [ ] Phase 2: Implementation plan created?
- [ ] Phase 2: TodoWrite tracking set up?
- [ ] Phase 3: Agent review completed (if needed)?
- [ ] Phase 4: All increments implemented?
- [ ] Phase 4: All todos marked complete?
- [ ] Phase 4: All tests passing?
- [ ] Phase 4: No breaking changes introduced?
- [ ] Phase 4: Performance optimized?
- [ ] Phase 4: Accessibility verified (WCAG 2.1 AA)?
- [ ] Phase 4: Component sizes within limits?
If any answer is NO, STOP and complete that phase.
🚀 Expected Outcomes
When this skill runs successfully:
- ✅ No duplicate code - Gap analysis finds existing implementations
- ✅ No redundancy - Reuses existing components/services
- ✅ Well-planned - Clear roadmap with time estimates
- ✅ Incrementally built - Small, testable steps
- ✅ High quality - Agent reviews catch issues early
- ✅ Well-tested - Tests run after each increment
- ✅ Performant - Optimization applied automatically
- ✅ Accessible - WCAG compliance checked
- ✅ Maintainable - Component sizes controlled
- ✅ Tracked - TodoWrite shows clear progress
📊 Success Metrics
Measure skill effectiveness:
- ✅ Zero duplicate implementations in last 10 features
- ✅ All features have implementation plans
- ✅ No surprise breaking changes in commits
- ✅ Test pass rate > 95% on first try
- ✅ Code review feedback declining over time
- ✅ Component sizes staying within limits
- ✅ Feature delivery time predictable (within 20% of estimate)
For detailed metrics and KPIs: See REFERENCE.md → Success Metrics
🔧 Automation Scripts
Validate increments:
# Linux/Mac
./scripts/validate-increment.sh
# Windows
./scripts/validate-increment.bat
Check file sizes:
./scripts/check-file-size.sh [file-path]
All scripts include:
- Research citations
- Clear pass/fail status
- Actionable recommendations
- Exit codes for CI/CD integration
📚 Supporting Documentation
For AI Assistants:
REFERENCE.md- Complete research citations, detailed procedures, troubleshootingEXAMPLES.md- Real-world workflow examples, before/after scenariosresources/gap-analysis-template.md- Gap analysis structureresources/implementation-plan-template.md- Complete planning templateresources/increment-checklist-template.md- Per-increment verification
Research Sources:
Academic:
- Google Research: "Modern Code Review" (9M reviews analyzed)
- Microsoft Research: "Expectations of Modern Code Review" (900+ devs surveyed)
- IEEE: "Continuous Integration Research" (meta-analysis)
- Scrum.org: "Incremental Delivery Research" (2024)
Industry:
- SonarQube: Code quality standards
- Atlassian: Trunk-based development
- Harness.io: CI/CD best practices
- MetriDev: Code duplication research
Books:
- "The DevOps Handbook" (Gene Kim)
- "Accelerate" (Nicole Forsgren)
- "Building Maintainable Software" (O'Reilly)
💡 Tips for Maximum Effectiveness
- Trust the process - Let all 4 phases run
- Don't skip gap analysis - Even if you "know" nothing exists
- Break steps small - 30-45 min increments ideal
- Test frequently - After EVERY increment
- Use agent reviews - They catch issues you miss
- Keep todos updated - Reflects real progress
- Use automation - Scripts save time and reduce errors
🔄 Integration with Other Skills
Works with:
- code-refactoring - Triggered when files exceed size limits
- ui-ux-audit - Invoked during Phase 3 for UI features
- devops-deployment - After Phase 4 for production deployment
- qa-testing - Referenced in Phase 2 for test strategy
Final Note
This skill is not optional. When user requests implementing any feature, this skill MUST run to enforce research-backed CI/CD workflow rules.
The goal: Ship high-quality features faster by preventing common mistakes through automation.
Research-backed. Industry-proven. Battle-tested.
Version History
- v1.0 (Oct 2025): Initial version based on CLAUDE.md
- v2.0 (Nov 2025): Added research citations, progressive disclosure, automation scripts, templates
For complete version history and detailed research: See REFERENCE.md
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: WomenDefiningAI
- Source: WomenDefiningAI/claude-code-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.