AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Feature Orchestrator

skill-womendefiningai-claude-code-skills-feature-orchestrator · by WomenDefiningAI

Research-backed feature implementation workflow enforcing gap analysis, incremental planning, agent coordination, and continuous integration best practices. Auto-invoked for ALL feature implementation requests to prevent code duplication and ensure CLAUDE.md compliance.

No reviews yet
0 installs
14 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-womendefiningai-claude-code-skills-feature-orchestrator

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Feature Orchestrator? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Feature Orchestrator Skill

🚨 CRITICAL: This Skill Runs BEFORE Feature Implementation

Purpose: Enforce research-backed CI/CD workflow, prevent code duplication, ensure incremental delivery

When to invoke: Automatically when user requests implementing ANY new feature, component, or functionality

Auto-invoke triggers:

  • "implement X feature"
  • "add Y functionality"
  • "build Z component"
  • "create new X"
  • "develop X feature"

What this skill does NOT apply to:

  • Bug fixes ( "Incremental delivery enables organizations to have greater visibility, decreases risks faster, delivers value sooner."

Continuous Integration (Harness.io, 2024): > "Small problems are easier to fix than big problems, and frequent commits make bugs easier to identify."

Code Review (Microsoft Research): > "Reviewing 200–400 lines of code at a time detects up to 90% of defects."

DRY Principle (MetriDev, 2024): > "Abstraction and modularity prevent code duplication through identifying common patterns for reuse."

For complete research citations and detailed procedures: See REFERENCE.md


🎯 Four-Phase Workflow

Overview

| Phase | Purpose | Time | Output | |-------|---------|------|--------| | 1. Gap Analysis | Search for existing code | 2-3 min | Reuse opportunities identified | | 2. Planning | Break into increments | 3-5 min | Implementation plan with todos | | 3. Review Gate | Agent quality review | 1-2 min | Feedback incorporated | | 4. Execution | Build incrementally | Varies | Feature complete, tests passing |


Phase 1: Gap Analysis (MANDATORY)

Purpose: Search for existing implementations BEFORE writing any code

Research: DRY principle - 100 | Invoke critic-agent | | Security critical | Auth, payments | Always review | | User-facing UI | Any | Invoke ui-ux-designer | | Simple addition | 20 lines → data files

  • Performance: React.memo() for animations, expensive components
  • Imports: No file extensions, use path aliases (@/...)
  • Accessibility: WCAG 2.1 AA compliance

File Size Monitoring:

# Check before editing
./scripts/check-file-size.sh [file-path]

# Thresholds:
# 150-200 lines → ⚠️  Plan extraction
# 200-300 lines → 🚨 Extract before adding
# 300+ lines    → 🛑 MUST refactor first

Detailed procedures: See REFERENCE.md → Phase 4

Verification (per increment):

  • [ ] Implemented ONLY this increment's scope?
  • [ ] All tests passing?
  • [ ] Todo marked completed?

🔄 Complete Workflow Example

See EXAMPLES.md for:

  • Complete auth system implementation (2.5 hours)
  • Simple feature addition (5 minutes)
  • Gap analysis preventing duplication
  • Review gate catching security issues

🎯 Integration with CLAUDE.md Rules

This skill enforces ALL mandatory CLAUDE.md rules:

  1. Search for existing code FIRST (Phase 1: Gap Analysis)
  2. Plan before implementing (Phase 2: Implementation Planning)
  3. Incremental implementation (Phase 4: Never break the build)
  4. Test between increments (Phase 4: lint + type-check + test)
  5. React.memo() for performance (Phase 4: Code quality rules)
  6. Coordinate agents (Phase 3: Review gate)
  7. TodoWrite tracking (Phase 2 + Phase 4)
  8. Component size limits (Phase 4: File size monitoring)

🚨 Anti-Patterns This Skill Prevents

❌ What NOT to Do:

  1. Starting without gap analysis → Skill forces search first
  2. No implementation plan → Skill requires incremental plan
  3. Large commits → Skill enforces small increments
  4. Breaking the build → Skill tests after each increment
  5. Skipping code review → Skill invokes agents automatically
  6. Giant components (>300 lines) → Skill monitors file size
  7. Missing optimization → Skill checks React.memo(), etc.

📋 Verification Checklist (Before Completing)

Before marking feature complete, verify:

  • [ ] Phase 1: Gap analysis completed?
  • [ ] Phase 1: Existing code reused where possible?
  • [ ] Phase 2: Implementation plan created?
  • [ ] Phase 2: TodoWrite tracking set up?
  • [ ] Phase 3: Agent review completed (if needed)?
  • [ ] Phase 4: All increments implemented?
  • [ ] Phase 4: All todos marked complete?
  • [ ] Phase 4: All tests passing?
  • [ ] Phase 4: No breaking changes introduced?
  • [ ] Phase 4: Performance optimized?
  • [ ] Phase 4: Accessibility verified (WCAG 2.1 AA)?
  • [ ] Phase 4: Component sizes within limits?

If any answer is NO, STOP and complete that phase.


🚀 Expected Outcomes

When this skill runs successfully:

  1. No duplicate code - Gap analysis finds existing implementations
  2. No redundancy - Reuses existing components/services
  3. Well-planned - Clear roadmap with time estimates
  4. Incrementally built - Small, testable steps
  5. High quality - Agent reviews catch issues early
  6. Well-tested - Tests run after each increment
  7. Performant - Optimization applied automatically
  8. Accessible - WCAG compliance checked
  9. Maintainable - Component sizes controlled
  10. Tracked - TodoWrite shows clear progress

📊 Success Metrics

Measure skill effectiveness:

  • ✅ Zero duplicate implementations in last 10 features
  • ✅ All features have implementation plans
  • ✅ No surprise breaking changes in commits
  • ✅ Test pass rate > 95% on first try
  • ✅ Code review feedback declining over time
  • ✅ Component sizes staying within limits
  • ✅ Feature delivery time predictable (within 20% of estimate)

For detailed metrics and KPIs: See REFERENCE.md → Success Metrics


🔧 Automation Scripts

Validate increments:

# Linux/Mac
./scripts/validate-increment.sh

# Windows
./scripts/validate-increment.bat

Check file sizes:

./scripts/check-file-size.sh [file-path]

All scripts include:

  • Research citations
  • Clear pass/fail status
  • Actionable recommendations
  • Exit codes for CI/CD integration

📚 Supporting Documentation

For AI Assistants:

  • REFERENCE.md - Complete research citations, detailed procedures, troubleshooting
  • EXAMPLES.md - Real-world workflow examples, before/after scenarios
  • resources/gap-analysis-template.md - Gap analysis structure
  • resources/implementation-plan-template.md - Complete planning template
  • resources/increment-checklist-template.md - Per-increment verification

Research Sources:

Academic:

  • Google Research: "Modern Code Review" (9M reviews analyzed)
  • Microsoft Research: "Expectations of Modern Code Review" (900+ devs surveyed)
  • IEEE: "Continuous Integration Research" (meta-analysis)
  • Scrum.org: "Incremental Delivery Research" (2024)

Industry:

  • SonarQube: Code quality standards
  • Atlassian: Trunk-based development
  • Harness.io: CI/CD best practices
  • MetriDev: Code duplication research

Books:

  • "The DevOps Handbook" (Gene Kim)
  • "Accelerate" (Nicole Forsgren)
  • "Building Maintainable Software" (O'Reilly)

💡 Tips for Maximum Effectiveness

  1. Trust the process - Let all 4 phases run
  2. Don't skip gap analysis - Even if you "know" nothing exists
  3. Break steps small - 30-45 min increments ideal
  4. Test frequently - After EVERY increment
  5. Use agent reviews - They catch issues you miss
  6. Keep todos updated - Reflects real progress
  7. Use automation - Scripts save time and reduce errors

🔄 Integration with Other Skills

Works with:

  • code-refactoring - Triggered when files exceed size limits
  • ui-ux-audit - Invoked during Phase 3 for UI features
  • devops-deployment - After Phase 4 for production deployment
  • qa-testing - Referenced in Phase 2 for test strategy

Final Note

This skill is not optional. When user requests implementing any feature, this skill MUST run to enforce research-backed CI/CD workflow rules.

The goal: Ship high-quality features faster by preventing common mistakes through automation.

Research-backed. Industry-proven. Battle-tested.


Version History

  • v1.0 (Oct 2025): Initial version based on CLAUDE.md
  • v2.0 (Nov 2025): Added research citations, progressive disclosure, automation scripts, templates

For complete version history and detailed research: See REFERENCE.md

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.