Install
$ agentstack add skill-wondelai-skills-traction-eos ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS)
A complete system for running a business with six key components. Designed for entrepreneurial companies ($2M-$50M revenue, 10-250 employees) that want to align vision and execution.
Core Principle
Most businesses suffer from the same core issues: people, vision, traction. Great vision without traction is hallucination; traction without vision is aimless. EOS connects the two through a practical weekly operating rhythm that strengthens the Six Key Components of any organization.
Scoring
Goal: 10/10. Rate any business 0-10 on EOS component strength: a 10/10 means all six components are strong, meetings are productive, and quarterly rocks are consistently achieved. Always state the current score and the improvements needed to reach 10/10.
The Six Key Components
Vision → People → Data → Issues → Process → Traction
Every business is built on these six components. EOS strengthens all six.
1. Vision Component
Question: Does everyone in the organization know where you're going and how you plan to get there?
Tool: Vision/Traction Organizer (V/TO) — answers eight questions on two pages:
| Question | What It Defines | Example | |----------|----------------|---------| | Core Values | 3-7 non-negotiable beliefs | "Own it", "Do the right thing", "Grow or die" | | Core Focus | Purpose/cause/passion + niche | "Simplify small business" + "Cloud accounting" | | 10-Year Target | Big, hairy, audacious goal | "$100M revenue" or "10,000 customers" | | Marketing Strategy | Target market, 3 uniques, proven process, guarantee | Who you serve, why you're different | | 3-Year Picture | What the company looks like in 3 years | Revenue, profit, headcount, key metrics | | 1-Year Plan | Revenue, profit, measurables, goals | Specific targets for this year | | Quarterly Rocks | 3-7 priorities for this quarter | Most important things in 90 days | | Issues List | All unresolved obstacles | Problems, ideas, opportunities |
Process: Leadership completes the V/TO together (2-day off-site), shares it with the entire organization, reviews quarterly, updates annually.
Key insight: If the leadership team can't agree on the V/TO, you have a bigger problem — alignment comes first.
See: [references/vto.md](references/vto.md) for V/TO templates and exercises.
2. People Component
Question: Do you have the right people in the right seats?
Tool: Accountability Chart — not an org chart; it defines the structure and who owns what.
Visionary ←→ Integrator
├── Sales/Marketing
├── Operations
└── Finance
- Visionary: Big ideas, culture, key relationships, creative problem solving
- Integrator: Runs the business day-to-day, manages the team, executes the vision
- Rule: One person per seat — shared accountability is no accountability
Tool: People Analyzer — evaluate every person on two dimensions:
- Right Person (core values fit): Rate +, +/-, or - on each core value. Must be "+" on all; one "+/-" is a conversation; any "-" means wrong person.
- Right Seat (GWC): Gets it (understands the role), Wants it (genuinely), Capacity (mental, physical, emotional). Must be "yes" on all three.
People decisions:
- Right person, right seat → keep and invest in
- Right person, wrong seat → move to the right seat
- Wrong person, right seat → coach or exit (hardest call)
- Wrong person, wrong seat → exit immediately
See: [references/people.md](references/people.md) for accountability chart and People Analyzer templates.
3. Data Component
Question: Are you managing based on objective data, or subjective opinions?
Tool: Scorecard — a weekly report card of 5-15 numbers that tell you how the business is doing. Weekly data spots problems 2-4 weeks earlier than monthly and replaces gut-feel management with accountability.
Scorecard rules:
- Activity-based metrics (leading indicators), not results (lagging)
- Weekly numbers — monthly is too slow to react
- Every number has an owner and a goal
- Red/green: on track or off track
Example:
| Metric | Owner | Goal | W1 | W2 | W3 | W4 | |--------|-------|------|----|----|----|----| | Revenue | Sales Lead | $50K/wk | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | | New Leads | Marketing | 100/wk | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | | Cash Balance | Finance | >$200K | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Metric selection: If you had to go on vacation for 4 weeks, what 5-15 numbers would tell you how the business is doing?
See: [references/data.md](references/data.md) for scorecard templates and metric selection.
4. Issues Component
Question: Are you identifying, discussing, and solving issues quickly?
Tool: Issues Solving Track (IDS) — Identify → Discuss → Solve:
- Identify: Ask "Why?" until you reach the root cause (not the symptom); state the issue in one sentence
- Discuss: Everyone gets input (not equal time); stop tangents; one issue at a time, time-boxed 5-15 minutes
- Solve: Make the decision, assign action items (who + what + when), move on
Three types of issues:
| Type | Examples | Action | |------|----------|--------| | Problems | Customer churn, team conflict, outage | IDS → solve | | Ideas | New feature, process change, opportunity | IDS → decide (yes/no/later) | | Obstacles | Blocked rock, resource constraint | IDS → remove or escalate |
Issues list rules: Anyone can add issues; prioritize most important first; unsolved issues carry forward — not everything gets solved each meeting.
Common IDS failures: discussing symptoms instead of root cause, rehashing the same issue weekly, ending without clear action items.
See: [references/issues.md](references/issues.md) for IDS facilitation guides.
5. Process Component
Question: Have you documented and consistently followed your core processes?
Tool: Core Process Documentation — the 20/80 rule: document 20% of your processes to get 80% consistency.
Core processes to identify: HR (hiring, onboarding, reviews), sales (lead → close), operations (delivery, fulfillment), customer service (support → resolution), finance (invoicing, collections).
Documentation format: Name the process, list 5-20 major steps with just enough detail (not a 50-page manual), make it visual where possible.
Example: Sales Process "The Closer"
- Qualify lead (BANT: Budget, Authority, Need, Timeline)
- Discovery call (30 min, question guide)
- Demo (customized to their pain points)
- Proposal (within 24 hours)
- Follow up (3 touches in 7 days)
- Close or disqualify
Followed By All (FBA): Document it, train on it, measure compliance, update quarterly — a documented process nobody follows is shelf-ware.
See: [references/process.md](references/process.md) for process documentation templates.
6. Traction Component
Question: Are you executing on your vision every day?
Rocks (Quarterly Priorities)
The 3-7 most important things to accomplish in the next 90 days. Ninety days is long enough to achieve something meaningful, short enough to maintain urgency.
Rock-setting process:
- Review the V/TO (vision, 3-year, 1-year)
- Brainstorm what must get done this quarter to stay on track
- Narrow to 3-7 company rocks, one owner each
- Each leadership member also sets 3-7 individual rocks
- Share with the organization and track weekly
SMART rocks: Specific ("Launch new pricing page", not "improve pricing"), Measurable (clear completion criteria), Achievable in 90 days, Realistic given resources, Time-bound (due end of quarter).
Rock scoring: Done = checked off (no partial credit); not done = carried forward or dropped. Target 80%+ completion. Beware rocks that are just "business as usual" — they don't move the needle.
See: [references/rocks.md](references/rocks.md) for rock-setting exercises.
Level 10 Meeting (Weekly Leadership Meeting)
The most important meeting in EOS. Every week, same day, same time, same agenda — 90 minutes, never longer.
| Time | Section | Purpose | |------|---------|---------| | 5 min | Segue | Good news, personal and professional | | 5 min | Scorecard | Review weekly numbers | | 5 min | Rock Review | On track / off track per rock | | 5 min | Headlines | Customer/employee quick updates | | 5 min | To-Do List | Last week's to-dos: done or not done | | 60 min | IDS | Identify, Discuss, Solve issues | | 5 min | Conclude | Recap to-dos, rate meeting 1-10 |
Rules:
- Starts and ends on time — protecting the rhythm is what makes it work
- No phones/laptops (except the agenda) — IDS needs full attention
- IDS gets 60 of 90 minutes — solving issues is the point, updates are not
- Rate the meeting 1-10 at the end (hence "Level 10"); below 8 means discuss what to improve
- To-dos are 7-day action items with an owner; done = 100% complete; target 90%+ completion
See: [references/level-10.md](references/level-10.md) for meeting facilitation guides.
EOS Implementation Timeline
Typical rollout: 2 years to full implementation.
| Phase | Timeline | Focus | |-------|----------|-------| | Focus Day | Day 1 (8 hours) | Accountability chart, rocks, scorecard, Level 10 | | Vision Building Day 1 | Month 1 | V/TO: core values, core focus, 10-year target | | Vision Building Day 2 | Month 2 | V/TO: marketing strategy, 3-year, 1-year, rocks | | Quarterly Sessions | Every 90 days | Review rocks, set new rocks, IDS major issues | | Annual Planning | Yearly | Full V/TO review, 1-year plan, Q1 rocks |
Self-implementation (read the book, follow the tools — free, slower) vs. EOS Implementer (certified facilitator — faster, expensive).
See: [references/implementation.md](references/implementation.md) for the rollout guide.
Organizational Checkup
Rate the company 1-5 on each statement:
| Component | Statement | Score (1-5) | |-----------|-----------|-------------| | Vision | Leadership team agrees on where we're going and how to get there | | | People | We have the right people in the right seats | | | Data | We manage from a weekly scorecard of 5-15 numbers | | | Issues | We solve issues quickly and permanently | | | Process | Core processes are documented and followed by all | | | Traction | We set and achieve 90-day priorities (rocks) | |
Scoring: 25-30 strong (fine-tune) | 20-24 good (close gaps) | 15-19 average (significant work) | below 15 weak (consider an EOS Implementer).
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Why It Fails | Fix | |---------|-------------|------| | Skipping Level 10s | Weekly rhythm lost, issues pile up | Protect the meeting, never cancel | | Too many rocks | No focus, nothing gets done | Max 7 company rocks, 3-7 per person | | Vague rocks | Can't tell if done | SMART rocks with clear criteria | | No scorecard | Managing by gut, constant surprises | Choose 5-15 weekly numbers | | Wrong people kept | Drags the entire team down | People Analyzer, make the tough calls | | V/TO not shared | Team doesn't know the vision | Share with the entire company |
Quick Diagnostic
| Question | If No | Action | |----------|-------|--------| | Does leadership agree on vision? | Misalignment | Complete the V/TO together | | Right people in right seats? | Performance issues | People Analyzer on all seats | | Managing from data weekly? | Reactive management | Build a weekly scorecard | | Issues solved permanently? | Same problems repeat | IDS in Level 10s | | Core processes documented? | Inconsistency | Document the top 5 processes | | 90-day priorities set and tracked? | No traction | Set quarterly rocks |
Reference Files
- [vto.md](references/vto.md): Vision/Traction Organizer templates, eight questions
- [people.md](references/people.md): Accountability chart, People Analyzer, GWC
- [data.md](references/data.md): Scorecard templates, metric selection
- [issues.md](references/issues.md): IDS process, facilitation, issue types
- [process.md](references/process.md): Core process documentation templates
- [rocks.md](references/rocks.md): Rock-setting exercises, SMART rocks
- [level-10.md](references/level-10.md): Meeting agenda, facilitation, rating
- [implementation.md](references/implementation.md): EOS rollout timeline, self-implementation guide
- [case-studies.md](references/case-studies.md): Companies that implemented EOS successfully
Further Reading
For the complete system:
- "Traction: Get a Grip on Your Business" by Gino Wickman
- "Get a Grip" by Gino Wickman & Mike Paton (EOS as a business fable)
- "Rocket Fuel" by Gino Wickman & Mark C. Winters (Visionary + Integrator relationship)
About the Author
Gino Wickman is the creator of EOS and founder of EOS Worldwide, a community of certified Implementers. Traction has sold over 2 million copies, and EOS is used by more than 250,000 companies worldwide. His work focuses on the practical tools entrepreneurial leadership teams need to get real traction.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: wondelai
- Source: wondelai/skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://skills.wondel.ai
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.