Install
$ agentstack add skill-wshobson-agents-wcag-audit-patterns ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
WCAG Audit Patterns
Comprehensive guide to auditing web content against WCAG 2.2 guidelines with actionable remediation strategies.
When to Use This Skill
- Conducting accessibility audits
- Fixing WCAG violations
- Implementing accessible components
- Preparing for accessibility lawsuits
- Meeting ADA/Section 508 requirements
- Achieving VPAT compliance
Core Concepts
1. WCAG Conformance Levels
| Level | Description | Required For | | ------- | ---------------------- | ----------------- | | A | Minimum accessibility | Legal baseline | | AA | Standard conformance | Most regulations | | AAA | Enhanced accessibility | Specialized needs |
2. POUR Principles
Perceivable: Can users perceive the content?
Operable: Can users operate the interface?
Understandable: Can users understand the content?
Robust: Does it work with assistive tech?
3. Common Violations by Impact
Critical (Blockers):
├── Missing alt text for functional images
├── No keyboard access to interactive elements
├── Missing form labels
└── Auto-playing media without controls
Serious:
├── Insufficient color contrast
├── Missing skip links
├── Inaccessible custom widgets
└── Missing page titles
Moderate:
├── Missing language attribute
├── Unclear link text
├── Missing landmarks
└── Improper heading hierarchy
Detailed patterns and worked examples
Detailed pattern documentation lives in references/details.md. Read that file when the navigation tier above is insufficient.
Best Practices
Do's
- Start early - Accessibility from design phase
- Test with real users - Disabled users provide best feedback
- Automate what you can - 30-50% issues detectable
- Use semantic HTML - Reduces ARIA needs
- Document patterns - Build accessible component library
Don'ts
- Don't rely only on automated testing - Manual testing required
- Don't use ARIA as first solution - Native HTML first
- Don't hide focus outlines - Keyboard users need them
- Don't disable zoom - Users need to resize
- Don't use color alone - Multiple indicators needed
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: wshobson
- Source: wshobson/agents
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://sethhobson.com
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.