AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Owner 5w2h

skill-xhdw-owner-mode-owner-5w2h · by XHdW

>-

No reviews yet
0 installs
1 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-xhdw-owner-mode-owner-5w2h

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Owner 5w2h? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Owner 5W2H

Run a bounded preflight on the requirement, design, implementation approach, research plan, or project plan being formed or revised. Find only the minimum missing, inconsistent, or disconnected context needed to settle a named plan decision. This may be one gap or the smallest coupled set that must be resolved together. Use Who, What, When, Where, Why, How, and How Much as overlapping internal coordinates rather than a mandatory checklist.

Keep one probe active:

> What concrete missing or contradictory context could select a different plan, and can current context or reality resolve it first?

Confirm the Planning Fork

Read the request, conversation, applicable instructions, artifacts, workspace state, and available tools before declaring a context gap. Preserve facts already established by the user or environment.

A direct request to use the lens or check a plan's completeness is sufficient. In all other cases, begin the scan only when both gates hold:

  • The current task is explicitly producing or revising a requirement, design, implementation approach, research plan, or project plan.
  • A concrete missing or contradictory item is already visible in the request, plan, artifact, or evidence, and its plausible answers would change a named decision about scope, protocol, architecture, mechanism, sequence, timing, authority, location, or lifecycle cost.

When either gate fails, continue the current task using its existing context. Begin the 5W2H scan from the visible planning fork.

Scan the Planning Context

Inspect only the dimensions and relationships that could distinguish the live planning alternatives:

  • Who: delegated role, authority, user, audience, approver, maintainer, and affected people.
  • What: practical outcome, artifact, protocol, compatibility boundary, scope, and observable completion evidence.
  • When: current time, deadline, dependency order, active effort, waiting, uncertainty, and re-estimation condition. Read [references/time-and-estimation.md](references/time-and-estimation.md) only when a deadline, dependency order, wait, or estimate could select between the live plan alternatives. Read [references/personal-calibration.md](references/personal-calibration.md) only when the user explicitly asks to create, use, or design a private estimate history.
  • Where: active workspace, repository or worktree, source of truth, environment, destination, Git state, and publication boundary. Read [references/workspace-and-repository.md](references/workspace-and-repository.md) only when the target location or its authority boundary could select between the live plan alternatives.
  • Why: user value, consequence, urgency, and the causal belief connecting the deliverable to the outcome.
  • How: mechanism, dependencies, tools, integration path, reality signal, recovery path, and stopping condition.
  • How Much: money, model or compute use, time, attention, context, rework, maintenance, delay, and downstream failure cost. Read [references/cost-and-rework.md](references/cost-and-rework.md) only when lifecycle cost or reversibility could select between the live plan alternatives.

Treat the dimensions as overlapping coordinates rather than exclusive categories. Look for contradictions and missing relationships between them; the controlling context may be a coupled set that belongs to no single heading.

If the plan remains underdetermined, test once whether a hidden relationship, dynamic, or higher-level purpose would change a named decision. Keep this higher-level check only when it reveals a different planning fork.

Resolve the Planning Fork

Discard candidates already established by reliable context and candidates unable to change a named plan decision. Resolve each remaining gap by its available path:

  • Discoverable: inspect an artifact, repository, clock, system, or authoritative source.
  • Reversible assumption: proceed when correction is cheap and delay costs more.
  • User-owned: surface the smallest choice whose alternatives materially change the plan.
  • Externally blocked: identify the unavailable external change and the evidence that makes it necessary.

Apply the resolved context directly to the requirement or plan. Stop when the plan choice is no longer sensitive to unresolved context, or when the only remaining dependency is the smallest user-owned choice or an evidence-backed external blocker.

End with the revised plan, planning decision, user-owned choice, or blocker rather than a separate 5W2H report. Keep private reasoning and the seven-dimension map internal.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.