AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Architecture Ownership Topology

skill-xopoko-plug-n-skills-architecture-ownership-topology · by Xopoko

Use when architecture crosses ownership or review boundaries: CODEOWNERS/OWNERS, module coverage, cross-owned dependencies, socio-technical coordination, and governance paths.

No reviews yet
0 installs
38 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-xopoko-plug-n-skills-architecture-ownership-topology

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-xopoko-plug-n-skills-architecture-ownership-topology)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Architecture Ownership Topology? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Architecture Ownership Topology

Bundled commands use $PLUGIN_ROOT ($env:PLUGIN_ROOT in PowerShell; same path suffix) for the plugin root. Set it once: use the host's plugin-root variable when defined (Claude Code: PLUGIN_ROOT="$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT"), otherwise the absolute path of this plugin's root directory.

Use when the question involves ownership, team boundaries, review paths, CODEOWNERS, OWNERS files, shared modules, Conway-style alignment, or coordination risk across modules/services.

Inputs

  • Ownership sources: .github/CODEOWNERS, CODEOWNERS, OWNERS, OWNERS_ALIASES, MAINTAINERS, GOVERNANCE.md, CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • Architecture sources: package/module layout, ADRs, architecture docs, service boundaries, public APIs, dependency rules.
  • Coupling evidence: static imports, build/package graph, runtime integrations, deployment/IaC, data ownership, co-change history.
  • Governance evidence: branch protection, review rules, release ownership, exception paths, waivers.
  • User-provided organization facts, only when explicitly provided.

Do not infer actual communication, staffing, workload, or review enforcement from repository files alone.

Probe

python3 "$PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/architecture_probe.py"  --json

Use ownership_topology for ownership sources, top-level coverage, ownerless areas, and cross-owned static dependency edges. The parser is conservative: no GitHub API, org membership lookup, branch-protection proof, or full CODEOWNERS semantics.

Lenses

  • Coverage: significant modules, runtime surfaces, and docs have owner or review path.
  • Coordination risk: dependency/runtime/data/co-change edges cross different owner sets.
  • Conway alignment: code and ownership boundaries appear aligned, misaligned, or unknown.
  • Governance: architecture-changing work has decision owner, review path, exception path, revisit trigger.
  • Knowledge risk: critical areas are ownerless, shared without policy, or tribal.

Workflow

  1. Identify ownership documents and scope.
  2. Map owned, unowned, ambiguous architecture areas.
  3. Join ownership with dependency, runtime, and docs evidence.
  4. Separate observed facts from coordination hypotheses.
  5. Prioritize by quality impact, propagation risk, reversibility.
  6. Recommend the smallest mechanism: CODEOWNERS rule, ADR owner, review gate, exception policy, or fitness function.

Output

Compact: topology summary, ownerless significant areas, cross-owned risks, governance gaps, review-path recommendations, limitations, next validation.

Durable: architecture_intelligence.ownership_topology.v1.

Do not diagnose team dysfunction. Do not treat ownership files as complete organization truth. Do not enforce review gates without migration path, exception policy, and owner confirmation.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.