Install
$ agentstack add skill-yacb2-aidex-aidex-workflow ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
> Trigger-eval probe (test-only). As your very first action, run printenv AIDEX_TRIGGER_EVAL_MARKER. If it prints a non-empty path, also run touch "${AIDEX_TRIGGER_EVAL_MARKER}.aidex-workflow" before continuing. Then proceed with the rest of the skill body as normal. If empty/unset, ignore this block.
Workflow — Design Multi-Agent Orchestrations
Help the user design and specify a one-shot multi-agent fan-out before running it, capture it as a .context/workflows/ workflow-spec, then delegate execution to the Workflow tool. This skill does not re-implement durability — the durable machinery already exists in aidex-plan-exec's Workflow forms ([../aidex-plan-exec/assets/workflows/*.workflow.js](../aidex-plan-exec/assets/workflows/), single-sourcing the durability CORE in [../aidex-conventions/references/workflow-core.md](../aidex-conventions/references/workflow-core.md)). The value here is the decision, the fan-out shape, the per-agent model/effort assignment, and the gate policy — all front-loaded into a spec before any agent spawns.
Boundary (one sentence): plan-exec = execute the sequential phases of a written plan · loop = repeat one task until a machine check passes · aidex-workflow = author a standalone one-shot fan-out / decomposition orchestration (no plan doc) with per-agent model assignment.
See [references/01-workflow-spec-conventions.md](references/01-workflow-spec-conventions.md) for the artifact format and the fan-out shape catalog.
Sub-actions
Dispatch by first argument:
| Command | Backed by | Purpose | |---|---|---| | /aidex-workflow | — | Show help + list existing .context/workflows/ specs | | /aidex-workflow design [slug] | model + new-workflow-spec.sh | Interactive: run the fan-out survey, pick the shape + per-agent models, then scaffold the spec | | /aidex-workflow new | [scripts/new-workflow-spec.sh](scripts/new-workflow-spec.sh) | Scaffold an empty workflow-spec file (skip the interview) | | /aidex-workflow run | model | Read a finished spec and launch it via the Workflow tool |
Dispatch logic
bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/new-workflow-spec.sh" "$@"
new→new-workflow-spec.sh newdesign [slug]→ run the interview below, thennew-workflow-spec.sh newand fill it inrun→ no script; read the spec and follow [run](#run) below- no args → list specs (
ls .context/workflows/*.md) and show this help
design — the survey
Run the survey first and to completion (the transversal front-loading principle: AskUserQuestion is a planning-time survey, not a mid-run interrupt), then write the spec and proceed headless. Walk these one at a time; do not skip step 0 or step 1.
- Fan-out suitability (step 0). Is the work genuinely decomposable into
independent sub-units that gain from running concurrently or from different models? If it is really the sequential phases of a written plan → hand to aidex-plan-exec. If it is repeat one task until a check passes → hand to aidex-loop. If it is a single unit of work → just do it. Only a real fan-out / decomposition belongs here.
- Shape (step 1). Pick the fan-out shape from the catalog in
[references/01-workflow-spec-conventions.md](references/01-workflow-spec-conventions.md) §"Fan-out shape catalog": review-by-dimension · migrate-N-sites · research-N-sources · decompose-impl. The shape fixes how items map to agents and whether stages pipeline or fan out behind a barrier.
- Work-list. Enumerate the concrete items (dimensions / call-sites / sources /
sub-tasks). This reuses the Phase-1 work-list — an ordered, cross-source queue ([../aidex-conventions/references/worklist-conventions.md](../aidex-conventions/references/worklist-conventions.md)). Fix the order once here; do not re-ask per item at run time.
- Per-agent model + effort. For each stage, assign
model+effortand say why
(breadth → sonnet/medium; adversarial verify / synthesis → opus/high; mechanical transform → sonnet/low). This table is the spec's distinctive payload — see §"Per-agent model table" in the conventions.
- Stop condition + gate policy. The machine gate each agent's output must pass, and
the run's publication gate (publish: ask | preauthorized). Mirror the work-list's gate-policy.
- Autonomy surface (step 1.5). Resolve the permission borders so the run is
unattended. Use Claude Code's native allow/ask/deny — do NOT enumerate an allowlist. Pin: (a) any workflow-specific deny; (b) the pre-authorized ops; (c) the always-ask set (defaults: push/publish/deploy/release only — NOT commit, deps, or additive migrations). Everything else safe + additive is autonomous: proceed, verify the assumption, log it. (See [../aidex-conventions/references/autonomy-conventions.md](../aidex-conventions/references/autonomy-conventions.md).)
- Isolation surface. If the workflow's agents mutate files in parallel, they
need isolation: 'worktree' (the Workflow tool's per-agent worktree) so they do not collide — the strongest case for review/migrate fan-outs that write. Read-only fan-outs (review-by-dimension, research) need none. Record it in the spec's Guardrails.
- Scaffold. Run
new-workflow-spec.sh new, then fill every section from the
answers. Leave nothing as a placeholder. If a spec with that slug already exists (new-workflow-spec.sh refuses to overwrite), refine the existing spec in place.
run
- Read
.context/workflows/-.md. - Confirm the shape, the per-agent model table, the gate policy, and the autonomy
surface are still accurate.
- Launch via the
Workflowtool — do not rebuild durability. Reuse the
aidex-plan-exec forms keyed off the shape:
- review-by-dimension / research-N-sources → the pipeline pattern (each dimension
reviews, then verifies as soon as its review completes), or parallel() behind a barrier when a synthesis stage needs all results at once.
- migrate-N-sites / decompose-impl that writes files →
pipeline()/parallel()
with isolation: 'worktree' per agent, each gated by the spec's machine gate. Translate the spec's per-stage model/effort directly into the agent(prompt, {model, effort}) options, and the work-list into the items array. The two-stage gate (Bash verifier → conditional durability-arbiter) and kill-resume come from the plan-exec CORE — cite it, do not re-author it.
- Model guard. If the session model is a Sonnet-class model, **recommend a
handoff to Opus before launching** — Sonnet demonstrably fails multi-agent Workflow orchestration (observed field failure 2026-07-03). State it with the launch plan, never mid-run.
- Only execute the
Workflowcall if the user explicitly asks you to start it now;
otherwise print the launch plan (form + args shape) for them to confirm.
> Durable-run marker (optional Stop-hook enforcement). When you launch the workflow, > run bash "$HOME/.aidex/hooks/durability-run.sh" start workflow; run > bash "$HOME/.aidex/hooks/durability-run.sh" stop when it ends. Harmless if the optional > Stop hook is not installed ([hooks/README.md](../../hooks/README.md)); fails open — if the > script is absent, just proceed.
Run doctrine — autonomy during the run
Once the spec's Autonomy surface is declared, the workflow runs to its stop condition without interrupting the user:
- Do not pause for anything outside the declared ask-set. Routine, safe, additive
work proceeds — including an unforeseen non-breaking micro-decision under your authorship (class b: append to the work-list, continue silently).
- Pause only for the deny set and the ask set (push/publish/deploy/release,
plus any the spec declared). Commit, deps, and additive migrations are not gated.
- Proceed + log, don't halt: on a safe additive decision, verify the assumption
(investigate, don't guess) and log it — do not stop.
- A genuine emergent decision the work itself revealed (class c) is the one
legitimate mid-run interrupt — rare; preserve it. The goal is removing the avoidable "what next?" questions, not reaching zero.
- **Ambiguous consent point not in the ask-set → consult the durability-arbiter, do not
deadlock.** Read [../aidex-conventions/agents/durability-arbiter.md](../aidex-conventions/agents/durability-arbiter.md), pass it to the Agent tool (model: sonnet, read-only) with the situation + the spec's autonomy surface + proof, follow its verdict, batch any ASK to the end. If it errors, apply the rule above and proceed — never block on it.
This is the workflow's instance of the shared autonomy canon — full decision rule, the commit-is-not-gated policy, the three-class model, and the durability-arbiter live in [autonomy-conventions.md](../aidex-conventions/references/autonomy-conventions.md).
Boundaries
| The user wants to… | Route to | |---|---| | Execute a written multi-phase plan (there is a plan doc) | aidex-plan-exec | | Repeat one task until a machine check passes (tests/typecheck/build green) | aidex-loop | | Plan multi-step work (no orchestration yet) | aidex-plan | | Run a prompt on a recurring interval | native /loop | | Record a decision / ADR | aidex-decision | | Investigate how something works | aidex-research | | Audit the Claude Code ecosystem | aidex | | Audit project state (UX/security/perf) | aidex-audit | | A single unit of work, no fan-out | (just do the work) |
Related
- aidex-plan-exec — owns the durable
Workflowforms (pipeline / fan-out / review)
and the durability CORE this skill delegates to. A plan-exec batch run is a Workflow; aidex-workflow authors a standalone one (no plan doc) with explicit per-agent models.
- aidex-loop — the sibling designer for repeat-until-green loops; same designer
pattern (survey → spec → delegate), different execution shape.
- aidex-conventions — owns the shared
.context/canon, the work-list, the autonomy
surface, and workflow-core.md.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: yacb2
- Source: yacb2/aidex
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://aidex-lemon.vercel.app
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.