AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Publish Npm Package

skill-yigitkonur-skills-by-yigitkonur-publish-npm-package · by yigitkonur

Use if publishing to npm via GitHub Actions — trusted publishing, provenance, semantic-release.

No reviews yet
0 installs
12 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-yigitkonur-skills-by-yigitkonur-publish-npm-package

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README — it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-yigitkonur-skills-by-yigitkonur-publish-npm-package)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
16d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming — see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps — measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Publish Npm Package? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Publish npm Package

Set up npmjs publishing via GitHub Actions with a complete, internally consistent release flow: auth, version management, package-manager installs, workflow trigger, provenance, validation, and recovery. Decisions and routing live here; full YAML and tool deep-dives live in references/.

When to use

Use this skill if the request is one of:

  • "publish this package to npm", "set up npm publishing", "automate npm releases"
  • "npm publish from GitHub Actions", "release workflow for npm", "npm CI/CD"
  • "trusted publishing", "OIDC for npm", "NPM_TOKEN provenance", "id-token: write"
  • "semantic-release", "changesets", "release-please", "automate version bumps"
  • "first publish of a new package", "bootstrap npm package", "link GitHub repo to npm"
  • "why is my npm publish failing", "EOTP / ENEEDAUTH / E403 in CI", "npm whoami in Actions"

package.json / repo signals that should pull this skill in:

  • "name" field plus "version" and a repository.url pointing at GitHub
  • .github/workflows/*.yml with npm publish, setup-node, id-token: write, or NPM_TOKEN
  • .npmrc with //registry.npmjs.org/:_authToken or ${NODE_AUTH_TOKEN}
  • presence of .releaserc*, release.config.js, .changeset/, or .release-please-*.json
  • scoped name (@scope/name) plus publishConfig.access decisions

Do NOT use this skill when:

  • deploying apps/services to a runtime (Railway, Vercel, Fly) — use the platform skill (e.g. run-railway)
  • writing the package's own runtime code, SDK internals, or APIs — use the relevant build-* skill
  • publishing to a non-npm registry (Docker Hub, GHCR, PyPI, crates.io) and npm is not also in scope
  • the only ask is which npm / package-manager command to run with no CI or release-automation context

Decide auth first, versioning second, then route to the workflow template

Always follow this order. Skipping it produces half-configured release automation.

  1. Classify the repo (table below).
  2. Pick auth: OIDC trusted publishing, or token (NPM_TOKENNODE_AUTH_TOKEN).
  3. Pick versioning: semantic-release, changesets, release-please, or manual.
  4. Route to the exact workflow template in references/workflows/.
  5. Check package/repo prerequisites and lockfile/package-manager.
  6. Verify with npm pack --dry-run, build/test in CI, tool-specific dry runs.
  7. If the repo is mid-migration or already failing, jump to recovery routing at the bottom.

Classify the repo first

Answer these and record the answers — they drive every later decision:

  1. Public or private package?
  2. GitHub Actions on a GitHub-hosted runner (vs self-hosted / GHES / non-GitHub CI)?
  3. Single package or monorepo / workspaces?
  4. Conventional commits actually used (majority of meaningful commits in type: description form)?
  5. Auto-publish on every releasable merge, or human-reviewed Release/Version PR?
  6. Greenfield (never published) or already published with tags/versions?
  7. Target really npmjs.org?

Derive answers from package.json + workspace manifests → existing workflows → git remote/tags → npm registry state. If still ambiguous, stop and ask — do not guess.

Decision matrix

| Public? | GH-hosted runner? | Single/Mono | Conv. commits? | Gate | Auth | Versioning | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | Yes | Yes | Single | Yes | Auto | OIDC | semantic-release | | Yes | Yes | Single | Yes | Human | OIDC | release-please | | Yes | Yes | Single | No | Human | OIDC | changesets | | Yes | Yes | Single | No (greenfield, will adopt) | Human | OIDC | release-please | | Yes | Yes | Monorepo | Any | Any | OIDC | changesets (default) | | No | Any | Any | Any | Any | Token | (any) | | Any | No (self-hosted/GHES) | Any | Any | Any | Token | (any) |

Auth lanes — keep them separate

| Lane | Use when | Requirements | Publish | Provenance | |---|---|---|---|---| | OIDC trusted publishing | Public package, public repo, GitHub-hosted runner, package already linked on npm | No npm token, id-token: write, contents: read, npm CLI 11.5.1+, Node 22.14.0+ | npm publish --access public | Automatic for eligible public packages — do not add --provenance | | Token + provenance | Token auth required, public provenance desired | NODE_AUTH_TOKEN, id-token: write, cloud runner, npm CLI 9.5.0+ | npm publish --provenance --access public | Explicit flag, NPM_CONFIG_PROVENANCE=true, or tool config | | Token only | Private package, self-hosted runner, GHES, private registry, bootstrap | NODE_AUTH_TOKEN; no id-token needed | npm publish --access public | None |

Auth rules:

  • Default to OIDC whenever supported. Trusted publishing means zero npm secrets — if the publish step has NODE_AUTH_TOKEN or NPM_TOKEN, it is token auth, not trusted publishing, even if id-token: write is set.
  • OIDC requires the package to already exist on npm. First publish of a brand-new package always bootstraps with a granular token, then switches to OIDC after linking the repo on npm.
  • OIDC does not work on self-hosted runners. Use a granular token there.
  • Use secrets.NPM_TOKEN exposed as NODE_AUTH_TOKEN. Do not run npm login in CI. Avoid classic automation tokens for new work.
  • One granular token per repo or workflow surface; rotate on a schedule.

Read the full lane:

  • references/auth/oidc-trusted-publishing.md — OIDC bootstrap, repo linking, provenance defaults
  • references/auth/granular-tokens.md — granular token creation, scoping, rotation, secret wiring

Local publish vs CI publish — know which mode you're in

Mixing these up is the #1 cause of EOTP / ENEEDAUTH errors.

> Guardrail: NODE_AUTH_TOKEN as a bare env var only works when an .npmrc contains ${NODE_AUTH_TOKEN}. In GitHub Actions, actions/setup-node writes that file when registry-url is set. On a developer machine, npm ignores NODE_AUTH_TOKEN unless the placeholder .npmrc exists.

Local publish (developer terminal)

Check existing auth before issuing tokens:

npm whoami --registry https://registry.npmjs.org
echo "${NPM_TOKEN:+NPM_TOKEN is set}"
cat ~/.npmrc 2>/dev/null | grep -v authToken | head
grep -l 'NPM_TOKEN' ~/.zshrc ~/.bashrc ~/.zprofile ~/.bash_profile 2>/dev/null

Wire the token (pick one):

# 1) CLI flag (most reliable locally; do NOT use in CI logs)
npm publish --access public --//registry.npmjs.org/:_authToken="${NPM_TOKEN}"

# 2) Temporary .npmrc (session-scoped)
echo "//registry.npmjs.org/:_authToken=${NPM_TOKEN}" > .npmrc
npm publish --access public
rm .npmrc

# 3) Browser 2FA login (no token needed)
npm login && npm publish --access public

> Guardrail: --//registry.npmjs.org/:_authToken=TOKEN is not a security risk on a local terminal. The "wrong" label in references/auth/granular-tokens.md applies only to CI logs.

CI publish (GitHub Actions)

Pure trusted publishing — no npm secret:

permissions:
  contents: read
  id-token: write
steps:
  - uses: actions/setup-node@v6
    with:
      node-version: '24'
      registry-url: 'https://registry.npmjs.org'
      package-manager-cache: false
  - run: npm publish --access public

Token auth — NODE_AUTH_TOKEN env on the publish step plus setup-node registry-url:

- uses: actions/setup-node@v6
  with:
    registry-url: 'https://registry.npmjs.org'
    package-manager-cache: false
- run: npm publish --access public
  env:
    NODE_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NPM_TOKEN }}

Diagnose "EOTP when token should bypass 2FA"

If a granular automation token with "Bypass 2FA" still gets EOTP:

  1. npm is not using your token — it has fallen back to interactive session auth.
  2. Run npm whoami. A personal username confirms session auth is active.
  3. Fix the wiring (CLI flag locally, setup-node + NODE_AUTH_TOKEN in CI). Do not rotate the token.

npm whoami does not validate trusted publishing. OIDC auth applies only during npm publish itself.

Versioning models — pick the model, not the tool

| Need | Choose | Use when | Avoid when | Read | |---|---|---|---|---| | Publish on every releasable merge | semantic-release | Single package, strong conventional-commit discipline, no human gate | Monorepos, weak commits, teams that want a reviewable Release PR | references/versioning/semantic-release.md | | Reviewable Release PR, publish on merge | release-please | Conventional commits exist, team wants a human merge gate | Untrustworthy commit messages, or zero-handling target | references/versioning/release-please.md | | Per-PR version intent, batched releases | changesets | Monorepos, single-package without conventional commits, explicit version notes | Repo wants publish-on-merge with no human-authored version data | references/versioning/changesets.md | | Rare/simple releases | manual trigger + npm version | Automation would outweigh release frequency | Task explicitly asks for full automation | "Manual Trigger" section of the matching workflow file |

Versioning rules:

  • Monorepo default: changesets. Use release-please only when conventional commits already drive the repo.
  • changesets is not monorepo-only. Single-package repos without conventional commits that want a human-reviewed Version PR are a valid use case.
  • Distinguish greenfield ("team will adopt conventional commits going forward") from existing repo ("commits already lack them"). Existing repos with inconsistent history → changesets, not semantic-release.
  • For existing published packages, bootstrap baseline state before the first automated run (initial tag for semantic-release; aligned config + manifest for release-please; initialized config for changesets).

> Guardrail: "Current version" in the release-please manifest = the version in package.json. For greenfield never-published packages, set it to whatever package.json says (typically 1.0.0 or 0.1.0). Do not guess 0.0.0.

Workflow templates — do not hand-assemble YAML from memory

| Auth | Versioning | Template | |---|---|---| | OIDC | semantic-release | references/workflows/oidc-workflows.md1. OIDC + semantic-release | | OIDC | changesets | references/workflows/oidc-workflows.md2. OIDC + changesets | | OIDC | release-please | references/workflows/oidc-workflows.md3. OIDC + release-please | | OIDC | manual trigger | references/workflows/oidc-workflows.md4. OIDC + Manual Trigger | | Token | semantic-release | references/workflows/token-workflows.md1. Token + semantic-release | | Token | changesets | references/workflows/token-workflows.md2. Token + changesets | | Token | release-please | references/workflows/token-workflows.md3. Token + release-please | | Token | manual trigger | references/workflows/token-workflows.md4. Token + Manual Trigger |

Monorepos: read references/monorepo-publishing.md before choosing a workspace flow. Prefer the changesets template; fall back to release-please when conventional commits already exist; do not default to semantic-release for monorepos.

> Guardrail: The workflow templates are the source of truth for full GitHub Actions YAML. The versioning references explain tool config, customization, and tool-specific failure modes — they are not standalone YAML sources.

Pre-implementation prerequisites

Package + repo

  • Code pushed to a GitHub repository.
  • package.json.repository.url exactly matches the GitHub repo URL, including casing.
  • Scoped public packages set publishConfig.access: "public" (or equivalent).
  • For pure trusted publishing, do not set publishConfig.provenance; npm auto-generates provenance for eligible public packages. Provenance config belongs to the token+provenance lane only.
  • Lockfile committed; CI uses the matching deterministic install.
  • npm pack --dry-run matches the intended tarball. If it includes src/ while main/module/types/exports point at dist/, stop and fix packaging before touching CI.
  • Packaging shape (files, exports, types, dual ESM/CJS): references/package-config.md.

Lockfile and package-manager detection

| Lockfile / marker | Install | Notes | |---|---|---| | package-lock.json or npm-shrinkwrap.json | npm ci | Default when no other PM is in use | | pnpm-lock.yaml | pnpm install --frozen-lockfile | Enable pnpm via Corepack | | yarn.lock + .yarnrc.yml or packageManager: yarn@… | yarn install --immutable | Yarn Berry / modern Yarn | | yarn.lock without Berry markers | yarn install --frozen-lockfile | Yarn Classic | | bun.lockb | bun install --frozen-lockfile | Only if the repo already uses Bun |

Multiple lockfiles: stop and reconcile the package-manager choice before changing release automation.

CI

  • actions/setup-node with registry-url: https://registry.npmjs.org.
  • Build/test runs in the same job (or upstream of) publish.
  • concurrency set to avoid publish races.
  • Permissions least-privilege and explicit.
  • Templates use actions/setup-node@v6, Node 24, package-manager-cache: false unless the repo deliberately keeps tag-readable examples.
  • For production: pin actions to full SHAs with tag comments — see references/supply-chain.md.

First-publish bootstrap (greenfield → OIDC)

> Guardrail: Trusted publishing requires the package to already exist on npm. Brand-new packages must bootstrap with token auth before linking trusted publishing.

  1. Create a granular access token on npmjs.com (references/auth/granular-tokens.md).
  2. Add it as NPM_TOKEN in GitHub Actions secrets.
  3. Publish once: npm publish --access public, or use a token-based workflow template for the first release.
  4. On https://www.npmjs.com/package//accessPublishing accessAdd GitHub Actions to link the repo.
  5. Remove NPM_TOKEN and switch the workflow to pure OIDC.

Migration prerequisites

  • semantic-release: full git history (fetch-depth: 0) and a baseline tag.
  • release-please: config + manifest aligned to the current package.json version.
  • changesets: contributor rule for adding changesets and clear handling of empty changesets.

Guardrails — half-configured release automation is worse than none

  • Prefer OIDC over granular tokens; granular tokens over classic automation tokens.
  • Prefer changesets over semantic-release for monorepos unless there is a strong existing reason not to.
  • Prefer release-please over semantic-release when the team wants a human-reviewed Release PR.
  • Prefer workflow templates from the references over inventing YAML from memory.
  • Do not pick semantic-release without real conventional commits, fetch-depth: 0, and a current toolchain that supports the chosen auth.
  • release-please needs the two-job pattern: one job creates/updates the Release PR, a second publish job runs only when release_created == 'true'.
  • Do not assume OIDC works on self-hosted runners.
  • Do not commit tokenized .npmrc files. Placeholder-based .npmrc is fine; real tokens are not.
  • Do not forget scoped public package access; E403 on a scoped package usually means publishConfig.access: "public" was never configured.
  • Do not add --provenance to pure trusted-publishing baselines. Use it only for token+provenance lanes.
  • Do not use pull_request_target to expose release secrets to untrusted code.
  • If the repo is mid-migration, finish auth + versioning + workflow + bootstrap together. Do not ship a half-state.

Validation scripts

Bundled helpers — read the paired .md for flags; do not load script source during normal use.

| Script | Use | |---|---| | scripts/check-package-json.mjs | Inspect package.json, detect package manager/lockfile, flag metadata and src/dist mismatches; emits JSON + human output. | | scripts/dry-run-publish.sh | Run npm pack --dry-run (and optionally npm publish --dry-run) without publishing. | |

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.