AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Run Codex Review Loop

skill-yigitkonur-skills-by-yigitkonur-run-codex-review-loop · by yigitkonur

Use if running Codex review loops across branches, lenses, comparisons, or convergence rounds.

No reviews yet
0 installs
7 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-yigitkonur-skills-by-yigitkonur-run-codex-review-loop

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README — it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-yigitkonur-skills-by-yigitkonur-run-codex-review-loop)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
16d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming — see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps — measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Run Codex Review Loop? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

run-codex-review-loop

Run repeatable Codex review passes without relying on the retired run-codex-2 dispatcher. This skill owns the loop around native Codex review execution; run-review in the main pack owns one-off review routing, PR handoff, and feedback triage.

Two modes:

  • Mode A — Multi-lens checkout audit (default): review the current active checkout branch (whatever git branch --show-current reports — often main) through many independent review lenses, in rounds, until findings converge.
  • Mode B — Multi-branch comparison: the original branch loop — run review across two or more named branches and compare findings.

Pick Mode B only when the user names two or more branches. Everything else — "review the whole project", "full audit", "multiple lenses", "review main", "review the current branch" — is Mode A.

Use This When

  • The user asks for a complete, multi-lens, whole-project Codex review of the current checkout branch.
  • The user asks to keep reviewing until issues converge or the branch is clean enough.
  • The user names two or more branches and asks for Codex review, convergence, close-out, or comparison.
  • A prior review loop has saved outputs and the user asks to resume or rescue it.

Do not use this for:

  • A single small PR, commit, or uncommitted diff. Use run-review Mode D.
  • Opening a PR or writing a self-review body. Use run-review Mode B.
  • Triaging human or bot comments already posted on a PR. Use run-review Mode C.
  • Generic multi-agent implementation fan-out. This skill is review-only.

Preconditions

Run these before any mode:

codex --version
git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree
git branch --show-current
git rev-parse --verify HEAD
git status --short

Require codex-cli 0.130.0 or newer.

  • Mode A: a dirty tree is allowed because the target is the current checkout as-is. Record tree: clean|dirty in the manifest.
  • Mode B: a dirty tree blocks. Stop and either ask for clean branch refs or use a one-off review flow instead.

For every branch named in Mode B:

git rev-parse --verify 

If a branch does not resolve locally, fetch it explicitly or report that it is missing. Do not silently drop it.

Mode A — Multi-lens checkout audit

Phase 0: Explore first

Do not start with Codex prompts. First understand the project enough to choose the right review lenses.

Spawn 1–3 Sonnet-class explore agents — Claude Sonnet or an equivalent mid-tier model. The point is fast, broad project mapping, not top-tier deep reasoning. Use equivalent local/default agents if Sonnet is unavailable. Give each agent a bounded mission such as:

  • Map the repo: product purpose, areas, entry points, runtime boundaries, and highest-risk modules.
  • Identify external systems, credential paths, write/mutation paths, data stores, and irreversible operations.
  • Read AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md plus architecture/safety docs and extract the invariants the code must uphold.
  • Find where docs make concrete guarantees that could drift from implementation.

The explore outputs are steering inputs. They decide what Codex reviews to run. Do not use a generic checklist when the project tells you what matters. A fragile ERP integration needs concurrency/token/governor lenses; a public web API needs authz/rate-limit lenses; a data pipeline needs idempotency/freshness/data-loss lenses.

Highest priority targets are the project's own explicit invariants — especially AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, operational-safety docs, architecture docs, and schemas. A contradiction between a stated invariant and runtime code is usually a real finding.

Phase 1: Plan each round

From exploration, write a lens list for round 1.

Rules:

  • Run minimum 3 and maximum 20 Codex reviews per round.
  • Scale with repo size and risk. 5–8 lenses is typical for a mid-size repo; 12–20 is for large or safety-critical systems.
  • Each lens must be genuinely distinct: different subsystem, different failure class, or different design question.
  • Do not split one lens into many near-duplicates just to hit a count.
  • If the user supplied focus text, preserve it and route it into the lens plan; do not broaden away from it.

Good lens shapes:

  • Safety-critical subsystem plus all callers.
  • Security and credential handling, including git history when relevant.
  • API contract, schemas, samples, and data integrity.
  • Error paths, partial failure, retries, idempotency, and data loss.
  • Concurrency, locking, queues, cancellation, and shutdown behavior.
  • Adversarial architecture challenge: assumptions, tradeoffs, scaling limits, single points of failure.
  • Docs-vs-code drift for operational claims.
  • Test coverage versus stated invariants.

Every lens prompt must demand:

  • Read complete relevant files, not only search snippets.
  • Trace at least one concrete path from entry point to risky behavior.
  • Report only correctness, security, data-loss, API-contract, stability, or design-risk findings.
  • Ignore style, formatting, naming, and vague best-practice advice.
  • Give file:line evidence, concrete trigger scenario, severity, and why it matters.
  • If clean after genuinely tracing, say clean explicitly.

Phase 2: Run the round

Create one run directory and one subdirectory per round:

mkdir -p "/tmp/codex-review-loop/$(date +%Y%m%dT%H%M%SZ)/round-1"

Record a manifest at the run root:

mode: multi-lens
branch: 
head: 
tree: clean|dirty
rounds-max: 10
round: 1
lenses:
- : 

Launch all lenses for the round in parallel, preferably in background tasks, one Codex run per lens. Use whichever execution surface is available:

  1. Codex companion runtime if installed:

``bash node "/scripts/codex-companion.mjs" task "" ``

  1. Native Codex:

``bash codex exec review --json -o "/tmp/codex-review-loop//round-N/.md" "" ``

After each run completes:

  • Verify the output exists and is non-empty.
  • Save or copy the result to /round-N/.md so the run is resumable.
  • If a run fails, mark that lens blocked with the exact command and stderr summary. Do not silently drop it.

Phase 3: Synthesize the round

Read every lens output and produce a deduplicated table:

| # | Severity | Finding | Evidence | Lenses | Status | |---|---|---|---|---|---|

Rules:

  • Deduplicate by file path plus behavior, not by wording.
  • Mark findings seen by multiple independent lenses as corroborated.
  • Carry status across rounds: new, still-open, fixed-verified, or regressed.
  • If a lens found nothing, record clean for that lens.
  • Do not treat a Codex report as verified truth. Before final synthesis, spot-check enough file:line evidence to reject obvious hallucinations or stale paths.

Phase 4: Loop until convergence

Run up to 10 rounds. Between rounds, fixes may be applied outside this skill by the main agent or user; this skill itself remains review-only.

For each next round:

  • Re-read the current branch/HEAD and update the manifest.
  • Keep lenses that found confirmed high-value issues, rewritten to verify whether those issues still exist.
  • Drop lenses that came back clean twice unless new code makes them relevant again.
  • Add new lenses if fixes, exploration, or prior findings reveal a new risk area.
  • Do not exceed 20 lenses in any round.

Stop early when the loop converges. Convergence means one of:

  • A round returns only small-detail/trivial findings: no critical/high issues and nothing that changes behavior, data integrity, security, API contract, or operational safety.
  • Two consecutive rounds add no new substantive findings.
  • All previously confirmed substantive findings are verified fixed or intentionally accepted by the user.

When stopping, state exactly which condition fired. Do not keep grinding after convergence; extra rounds at that point manufacture noise.

Mode B — Multi-branch comparison

  1. Create a timestamped run directory and manifest:

```text mode: branch-comparison base: branches:

```

  1. For each branch, switch to it, verify clean, and run:

``bash codex exec review \ --base \ --json \ -o "/tmp/codex-review-loop//-last.md" \ "Review only major correctness, security, data-loss, API-contract, and stability risks. Ignore style." ``

  1. Preserve any user-provided focus text. Do not broaden it.
  2. Verify each output file exists and is non-empty before moving to the next branch.
  3. Synthesize:

| Branch | Verdict | Major findings | Evidence | Next action | |---|---|---|---|---|

Deduplicate shared findings across branches. Mark findings as branch-specific or shared. Mark clean branches as clean. Mark failures as blocked with exact command and stderr summary.

Resume / Rescue

Locate the latest run directory under /tmp/codex-review-loop/ or use the user-provided path. Read the manifest and list completed outputs.

  • Mode A: continue missing lenses in the current round, then synthesize. Do not rerun completed lenses unless the user asks or HEAD changed.
  • Mode B: continue missing branches only.
  • If current scope differs from the manifest — branch, base, lens intent, or round target — create a new run directory. Never reuse a stale manifest.

Boundaries

  • Do not edit code. This is a review loop, not a fix loop.
  • Do not create PRs, push, post comments, deploy, or trigger external actions unless the user explicitly asks for that separate action.
  • Do not invent a replacement dispatcher script. Codex companion or native codex exec is the execution surface.
  • Do not reference retired skills or deleted paths.

Final Output

Return:

  • Run directory.
  • Mode and target branch/HEAD.
  • Rounds executed and stop condition, for Mode A.
  • Branch matrix, for Mode B.
  • Deduplicated findings with severity, evidence, lenses, and status.
  • Blocked lenses/branches, if any.
  • Exact verification rung reached:

Verification rungs:

  • Rung 1: target branch/refs verified; exploration complete for Mode A.
  • Rung 2: every Codex run completed or is explicitly blocked.
  • Rung 3: output files checked non-empty and saved into the run directory.
  • Rung 4: findings synthesized, deduplicated, and status-tracked across rounds or branches.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.