Install
$ agentstack add skill-yipxiyi-openarc-clarification-gate ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Clarification Gate
Use this skill before product, spec, planning, or implementation work when the request is new, broad, ambiguous, risky, or likely to affect multiple files or governance surfaces.
Goal
Turn an unclear request into a decision-ready handoff without creating a new documentation program.
The gate should decide:
- what the user wants
- what is out of scope
- which facts are already known from the repository
- which assumptions are risky
- which source-of-truth docs should carry the result
- whether implementation can start
Workflow
- Inspect existing repository evidence before asking questions:
- README and package metadata
- agent guide
docs/PROJECT_BRIEF.mddocs/CODE_STYLE.mddocs/PRD.mddocs/SPEC.mdor latestdocs/specs/*docs/DESIGN.mdonly for UI, frontend, desktop, mobile, or component workdocs/BRAND.mdonly for public brand, naming, marketing, identity, or copy workdocs/TASKS.mddocs/CHANGELOG_AI.md- relevant source files, tests, assets, or configs
- Separate:
- known facts
- unknowns
- contradictions
- risky assumptions
- reusable existing systems
- Ask only material questions that cannot be answered from repository evidence.
- Produce a short clarification handoff.
- Route the work to the smallest next OpenArc workflow:
product-governancewhen product intent or scope must be capturedspec-workflowwhen behavior, acceptance criteria, or compatibility must be specifiedplanning-enginewhen implementation order, validation, or migration needs structurerepository-governanceorworkspace-migrationwhen setup or migration is the real task- direct implementation only when scope, constraints, and validation are already clear
Question Budget
Default budget: ask at most 5 questions.
Allowed range: 3-7 questions when the request genuinely needs more or less.
Each question must:
- change the implementation or documentation result
- include a recommended answer
- state the trade-off behind that recommendation
- avoid asking for facts that can be discovered from the repository
If confidence is high enough to proceed, record remaining ambiguity under Open Questions in the target PRD, spec, or plan instead of blocking all work.
Handoff Shape
Use this structure in the conversation, or paste it into the target PRD, spec, or plan when the repository keeps persistent docs:
## Clarification Gate
- Goal:
- Non-goals:
- Audience / users:
- Constraints:
- Known facts:
- Unknowns:
- Risky assumptions:
- Decisions:
- Target docs:
- Implementation readiness:
Implementation readiness must be one of:
ready: implementation can begin after updating the stated docsneeds PRD: product intent or scope is not stable enoughneeds spec: behavior, acceptance criteria, or compatibility is not stable enoughneeds plan: implementation order, migration, rollback, or validation is not stable enoughblocked: a material user or external decision is required
Documentation Targets
Prefer existing OpenArc documents over new document families:
- Product intent, audience, goals, and non-goals ->
docs/PRD.md - Behavior, compatibility, acceptance criteria, and feature scope ->
docs/SPEC.mdordocs/specs/* - Implementation sequence, validation, rollback, and migration ->
docs/plans/* - Active execution status ->
docs/TASKS.md - Recent AI-assisted changes and decisions ->
docs/CHANGELOG_AI.md - Code conventions and guardrails ->
docs/CODE_STYLE.md - UI implementation rules ->
docs/DESIGN.md
Do not create docs/intake/ or another permanent intake tree by default.
Decision Records
Do not default to ADRs.
Prefer the existing PRD, spec, plan, task, changelog, code-style, or design document that already owns the decision.
Only suggest an ADR when all of these are true:
- The decision is hard to reverse.
- The choice will look surprising without context.
- Real alternatives were considered and rejected for specific reasons.
If the repository already has an ADR convention, follow it. Otherwise, ask before creating docs/adr/.
Rules
- Do not implement during the clarification gate.
- Do not create PRD, design, brand, or ADR documents just because the gate ran.
- Do not ask unlimited interview questions.
- Do not import third-party skills as core dependencies.
- Reuse existing repository vocabulary, but challenge overloaded terms when they would change the work.
- Treat script, CLI, automation, library, and docs-only repositories as non-UI unless the repository or user request shows UI, visual, or brand signals.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: Yipxiyi
- Source: Yipxiyi/OpenArc
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://github.com/Yipxiyi/OpenArc
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.