AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Geps V5

skill-zealousear-claude-skills-geps-v5 · by ZealousEar

A Claude skill from ZealousEar/claude-skills.

No reviews yet
0 installs
11 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-zealousear-claude-skills-geps-v5

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-zealousear-claude-skills-geps-v5)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Geps V5? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

GEPS v5 — Graph-Guided Evolutionary Portfolio Search

A multi-stage research idea generation and evaluation pipeline that replaces debate-as-core with search + ranking + calibration.

Step 0: Model Configuration Prompt

Before executing the pipeline, check whether the user's message already specifies model preferences (e.g., "budget mode", "opus for generators, gemini for judges"). If it does, apply those preferences directly and skip this prompt. If it does NOT, present the following using AskUserQuestion:

Model configuration for /geps:

GENERATOR MODELS (Stage B — idea generation, 4 channels):
  1. all available — opus, chatgpt-5.4, gpt-5.2, gemini-3.1-pro, kimi-2.5, glm-5, minimax-m2.5 (default)
  2. top-tier only — opus, chatgpt-5.4, gemini-3.1-pro
  3. custom — specify which models to use

JUDGE POOL (Stage D — pairwise tournament):
  Default: opus, chatgpt-5.4, gpt-5.2, gemini-3.1-pro, kimi-2.5, glm-5, minimax-m2.5
  (enter custom list to override, or press Enter for default)

REASONING EFFORT (optional — press Enter for defaults):
  Claude (opus):      thinking budget → [16k tokens (default) / 32k / 64k / 128k]
  ChatGPT (5.4/5.2):  reasoning_effort → [xhigh (default) / high / medium / low]

CONTEXT WINDOW (optional — press Enter for defaults):
  [default / specify tokens / auto (orchestrator decides based on corpus size)]

Enter choice (e.g. "1", "top-tier judges=opus,gemini-3.1-pro,chatgpt-5.4", "custom: generators=opus,kimi-2.5"):

Parsing the response:

  • If "all available" or "1" → use all_models from gib-config.json
  • If "top-tier only" → filter to opus, chatgpt-5.4, gemini-3.1-pro
  • If "custom" → parse model lists for generators and/or judges
  • If judge pool specified → override default_judge_pool in gib-config.json for this run
  • If reasoning effort specified → pass overrides to llm_runner.py calls
  • If context window specified → apply as runtime override; if "auto", scale based on literature corpus size
  • If user presses Enter or says "defaults" → use existing gib-config.json and model-settings.json

Architecture

7-stage pipeline:

  • Stage A: Build concept graph from literature corpus; identify structural holes
  • Stage B: Multi-channel idea generation (graph-explorer, analogy-transfer, exploit-refiner, constraint-injection)
  • Stage C: Mechanical screening gates (data, complexity, identifiability, novelty, ethics)
  • Stage D: Swiss-system pairwise tournament with Bradley-Terry aggregation
  • Stage E: Finalist verification (pairwise fatal-flaw audit + novelty audit + evidence scoring)
  • Stage F: Portfolio optimization (greedy forward selection with taxonomy quotas)
  • Stage G: Feedback loop (Thompson Sampling channel weights from failure ledger)

Invocation

/geps full              # Run complete pipeline
/geps generate          # Stage B only
/geps screen            # Stage C only
/geps calibrate         # Run judge calibration (required before first tournament)
/geps tournament        # Stage D only
/geps verify            # Stage E only
/geps portfolio         # Stage F only
/geps feedback          # Stage G only

Key Design Decisions

| Decision | Choice | Rationale | |----------|--------|-----------| | LLM runner | Reuse debate skill's llm_runner.py | No duplication; standalone CLI tool | | Embeddings | TF-IDF + Jaccard (stdlib) | No pip deps | | BT estimation | MAP via MM algorithm; rho_j fixed from calibration | Scale identifiability | | Tournament | FIDE Swiss + adaptive judging | Budget-safe; deterministic with --seed | | Portfolio | Greedy forward selection | Pure Python; no submodularity guarantee | | Concept graph | Literature corpus as primary source | Avoids amplifying existing idea bias | | Judge diversity | No same-provider duplicates per match | Decorrelation is paramount |

Dependencies

  • Python 3.10+ (stdlib only — no pip packages)
  • ~/.claude/skills/convolutional-debate-agent/scripts/llm_runner.py for LLM calls
  • ~/.claude/skills/convolutional-debate-agent/settings/model-settings.json for model routing

Scripts (14 total)

Wave 1 — Foundational

| Script | Purpose | |--------|---------| | concept_graph.py | Literature-driven concept graph + structural holes | | style_normalizer.py | Strip persuasion + standardize template | | mechanical_gates.py | 5 hard gates (no LLM) | | taxonomy_labeler.py | Rule-based multi-label taxonomy | | literature_retrieval.py | 3-mode retrieval with caching |

Wave 2 — Evaluation Core

| Script | Purpose | |--------|---------| | swiss_tournament.py | Adaptive judging + field reduction | | judge_pairwise.py | Strict JSON parse, fail-loud | | bradley_terry.py | Fixed rho_j, sum-zero theta, L2-reg pi | | calibration.py | Judge accuracy + bias estimation | | run_calibration_judging.py | Calibration orchestrator |

Wave 3 — Aggregation & Feedback

| Script | Purpose | |--------|---------| | portfolio_optimizer.py | Greedy selection + taxonomy quotas | | failure_ledger.py | Bernoulli Thompson Sampling | | rwea_v2.py | Combined RWEA2 scoring formula | | verify_finalists.py | Round-robin pairwise + novelty + evidence |

File Layout

~/.claude/skills/geps-v5/
├── SKILL.md
├── errors.md
├── settings/
│   ├── geps-config.json
│   ├── taxonomy.json
│   ├── calibration-pack.json
│   ├── literature_sources.json
│   └── judging_schedule.json
├── scripts/          (14 Python scripts)
├── prompts/          (9 prompt templates)
└── references/       (architecture docs)

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.