Install
$ agentstack add skill-zealousear-claude-skills-system-augmentor ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ● Environment & secrets Used
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
System Augmentor for Claude Code
Identifies what your Claude Code system cannot do, finds solutions, evaluates them rigorously, and installs the best one. A meta-skill that makes all other skills better.
When to Use
- You want to extend Claude Code with new capabilities (MCP servers, CLI tools, skills)
- You suspect something is missing but aren't sure what
- You want to compare competing solutions before installing
- You want a full audit of your system's strengths and gaps
When NOT to Use
- You already know exactly what to install (just install it)
- You want to debug an existing skill (fix it directly)
- You want to modify project code (use normal Claude Code)
Invocation
/improve # Full system audit
/improve web scraping # Focused audit on web scraping capability
/improve paper search # Focused audit on academic paper search
/improve testing # Focused audit on testing tools
The Four Phases
User: /improve [focus]
|
v
[Phase 1: Deep System Audit]
- system_scanner.py → filesystem inventory
- gap_analyzer.py → structural gap detection
- Claude reasoning → capability-level gaps
- STOP: present findings, ask which gaps to research
|
v
[Phase 2: Online Research]
- WebSearch queries from search-templates.json
- WebFetch promising results
- Ranked candidate list per gap
- STOP: present candidates, ask which to debate
|
v
[Phase 3: Evaluate via /debate] (optional — skip for trivial fixes)
- AskUserQuestion: thinking token budget (small/medium/high)
- Compose question from debate-question-template.md
- Call Skill(skill="debate", args="[TOKEN_BUDGET: X]\n\n")
- Full protocol: 5 solvers, 4 debaters, RWEA scoring
- STOP: present winner, ask permission to implement
|
v
[Phase 4: Implement]
- Execute chosen solution
- Follow safety checklist
- Test the implementation
- Report what changed
Phase Details
Phase 1: Deep System Audit
- Run
system_scanner.py --output-json --prettyto inventory the filesystem - Read discovered files to understand current capabilities
- Run
gap_analyzer.py --manifest --prettyto detect structural gaps - Apply reasoning to identify capability-level gaps not caught by rules
- Present findings to user with severity ratings
Phase 2: Online Research
For each user-approved gap:
- Load query templates from
settings/search-templates.json - Run 2-4 WebSearch queries per gap, substituting keywords
- WebFetch top results to extract: description, install method, dependencies, maintenance status
- Produce ranked candidate list (2-4 candidates per gap)
Phase 3: Evaluate via /debate
For non-trivial choices (2+ viable candidates):
- Ask user for thinking token budget via AskUserQuestion (small/medium/high)
- Compose question using
references/debate-question-template.md - Fill in context from Phase 1 manifest and Phase 2 candidates
- Call
Skill(skill="debate", args="[TOKEN_BUDGET: ]\n\n") - Debate runs full protocol (5 solvers, 4 debaters, RWEA) and returns winner
Skip the debate when:
- Only one candidate exists
- Solution is a simple install command
- Gap severity is LOW
- User says "just do it"
Phase 4: Implement
Execute the winning solution following the safety checklist:
- Check if target already exists before creating
- Never write API keys directly — create
.env.exampletemplates - Test the installation (run a smoke test)
- Report what was created/modified
File Structure
~/.claude/commands/improve.md # Slash command (orchestration)
~/.claude/skills/system-augmentor/
SKILL.md # This file
scripts/
system_scanner.py # Filesystem inventory scanner
gap_analyzer.py # Structural gap detector
settings/
scan-targets.json # Configurable scan paths & tools
search-templates.json # WebSearch query patterns per category
references/
gap-taxonomy.md # Gap classification schema
debate-question-template.md # Template for /debate questions
Safety Rules
- Idempotent: Always check existence before creating files/dirs
- No secrets: Never write API keys into files — create
.env.exampletemplates - User consent: Stop between every phase for user confirmation
- Reversible: Prefer solutions that can be easily uninstalled
- Respect permissions: Check
settings.local.jsonallowlist before adding Bash permissions - Minimal scope: Only install what's needed for the identified gap
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: ZealousEar
- Source: ZealousEar/claude-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.