AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Competition Mailbox Abuse

skill-zhaoxuya520-reverse-skill-competition-mailbox-abuse · by zhaoxuya520

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for enterprise mail abuse, OAuth consent, inbox or forwarding rules, transport rules, shared mailbox access, phishing chains, and token-to-mailbox side effects. Use when the user asks to trace mailbox rules, OAuth consent grants, forwarding or delegate abuse, shared mailbox access, message-trace evidence, or explain how…

No reviews yet
0 installs
3 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-zhaoxuya520-reverse-skill-competition-mailbox-abuse

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-zhaoxuya520-reverse-skill-competition-mailbox-abuse)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Competition Mailbox Abuse? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Competition Mailbox Abuse

Use this skill only as a downstream specialization after $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator is already active and has established sandbox assumptions, node ownership, and evidence priorities. If that has not happened yet, return to $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator first.

Use this skill when the decisive path runs through mailbox behavior, consent flow, or message-routing effects rather than generic AD evidence alone.

Reply in Simplified Chinese unless the user explicitly requests English.

Quick Start

  1. Decide whether the active path is phishing-to-consent, token-to-mailbox, rule-based persistence, or transport-level mail rerouting.
  2. Keep mailbox evidence, identity evidence, and message-trace evidence tied to the same user, mailbox, token, or message ID.
  3. Separate possession of a token or delegate edge from the actual mailbox effect it enables.
  4. Record forwarding targets, rule predicates, consent scopes, shared mailbox edges, and resulting mail flow in compact blocks.
  5. Reproduce the smallest mail effect that proves persistence, exfiltration, or privilege.

Workflow

1. Map The Mail Trust Path

  • Identify the principal, mailbox, token or session, consent grant, delegate edge, shared mailbox relationship, or app registration involved.
  • Record consent scopes, mailbox permissions, rule ownership, transport actions, and message-trace identifiers.
  • Distinguish client-visible symptoms from server-side mailbox or transport state.

2. Prove The Mailbox Effect

  • Correlate consent logs, sign-ins, message traces, inbox rules, transport rules, forwarding settings, and mailbox audit events.
  • Show which rule or token produces which concrete effect: silent forwarding, marking read, deletion, delegate access, or message rerouting.
  • Keep message IDs, sender or recipient pairs, and timestamps aligned across logs.

3. Reduce To The Decisive Abuse Chain

  • Compress the path to the smallest sequence: lure or grant -> token or delegate edge -> mailbox or transport mutation -> resulting mail effect.
  • State clearly whether persistence lives in consent, mailbox rules, transport config, or shared mailbox permissions.
  • If the task broadens into host pivots or Kerberos acceptance, switch back to the broader identity skill.

Read This Reference

  • Load references/mailbox-abuse.md for the consent checklist, rule checklist, and evidence packaging.

What To Preserve

  • Consent scopes, token claims, mailbox permissions, rule definitions, forwarding targets, and message IDs
  • Message-trace lines, audit events, and mailbox effects tied to the same mail path
  • The smallest replayable sequence that proves persistence, exfiltration, or delegate access

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.