Install
$ agentstack add skill-zubair-trabzada-ai-marketing-claude-market-landing ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Landing Page CRO Analysis
Skill Purpose
Perform a comprehensive Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO) analysis on any landing page. This skill produces a section-by-section teardown with prioritized, actionable fixes that directly impact conversion rates.
When to Use
- User provides a landing page URL and asks for conversion optimization
- User asks for landing page feedback, review, or audit
- User wants to improve signup, lead capture, or purchase rates
- Triggered by
/market landingor/market cro
How to Execute
Step 1: Identify the Page Type
Determine which type of landing page you are analyzing. This affects benchmark expectations and scoring weights.
| Page Type | Primary Goal | Good CR | Great CR | |---|---|---|---| | Lead Capture | Email/form submission | 5-10% | 15%+ | | SaaS Signup | Free trial or freemium signup | 3-7% | 10%+ | | E-commerce Product | Add to cart / Purchase | 2-4% | 5%+ | | Webinar Registration | Register for event | 20-30% | 40%+ | | App Download | Install app | 10-15% | 20%+ | | Waitlist | Join waitlist | 15-25% | 35%+ | | Consultation Booking | Schedule a call | 5-10% | 15%+ | | Nonprofit Donation | Make a donation | 2-5% | 8%+ |
Step 2: Run the 7-Point CRO Framework
Analyze each section in order. Score each section 1-10 and provide specific findings.
Section 1: Hero Section (Weight: 25%)
The first screen a visitor sees. This is where 80% of conversion decisions begin.
Checklist:
- [ ] Headline is visible within 2 seconds of page load
- [ ] Headline communicates the primary benefit (not a feature)
- [ ] Headline is under 10 words
- [ ] Subheadline expands on the headline with specificity
- [ ] Primary CTA is above the fold
- [ ] CTA button color contrasts with the background
- [ ] CTA text is action-oriented (not "Submit" or "Click Here")
- [ ] Hero image or video supports the message (not generic stock)
- [ ] Trust badges or social proof visible above the fold
- [ ] Page loads in under 3 seconds
- [ ] No navigation menu competing with the CTA (for dedicated landing pages)
Scoring Criteria:
- 9-10: Headline is benefit-driven, specific, and compelling. CTA is clear and contrasting. Visual supports the message. Trust indicators present.
- 7-8: Strong headline and CTA but missing one element (trust badges, supporting visual, or specificity).
- 5-6: Generic headline or weak CTA. Missing multiple above-the-fold elements.
- 3-4: Headline is feature-focused or vague. CTA is below the fold or unclear.
- 1-2: No clear headline or CTA. Visitor cannot understand the offer within 5 seconds.
Section 2: Value Proposition (Weight: 20%)
How clearly the page communicates WHY someone should convert.
Checklist:
- [ ] Clear statement of what the product/service does
- [ ] Specific outcomes or results promised
- [ ] Differentiation from alternatives (why THIS solution)
- [ ] Target audience is clear (visitor knows if this is for them)
- [ ] Benefits are quantified where possible (save X hours, increase Y%)
- [ ] Value proposition is scannable (not buried in paragraphs)
Evaluate Using the 4U Framework:
- Useful - Does it solve a real problem the visitor has?
- Urgent - Is there a reason to act now?
- Unique - Is it different from competitors?
- Ultra-specific - Are claims concrete, not vague?
Section 3: Social Proof (Weight: 15%)
Evidence that others trust and benefit from this product/service.
Types of Social Proof (ranked by persuasion power):
- Revenue/results metrics ("$2.4B processed", "500K users")
- Named customer testimonials with photos, titles, and companies
- Recognizable client logos
- Case studies with specific results
- Star ratings and review counts
- Media mentions ("As seen in...")
- Certifications and awards
- User-generated content
- Social media follower counts
Checklist:
- [ ] At least 2 types of social proof present
- [ ] Testimonials include real names and photos
- [ ] Testimonials mention specific results or outcomes
- [ ] Social proof is placed near decision points (close to CTAs)
- [ ] Numbers are specific (not rounded - "11,847" beats "10,000+")
- [ ] Logos are recognizable to the target audience
- [ ] Social proof is recent and relevant
Section 4: Features and Benefits (Weight: 15%)
How the page presents what the product/service includes.
Checklist:
- [ ] Features are translated into benefits (what the feature DOES for the user)
- [ ] Content is scannable (icons, bullet points, short paragraphs)
- [ ] Visual hierarchy guides the eye through features
- [ ] Most important features/benefits are listed first
- [ ] Each feature section has a clear mini-headline
- [ ] Screenshots, demos, or visuals accompany feature descriptions
- [ ] Feature list is comprehensive but not overwhelming (3-7 key features)
Feature-to-Benefit Translation Check: Bad: "AI-powered analytics dashboard" Good: "See exactly which campaigns drive revenue -- AI analyzes your data so you don't have to"
Section 5: Objection Handling (Weight: 10%)
How the page addresses reasons a visitor might NOT convert.
Common Objections by Page Type:
| Objection | How to Address | |---|---| | "Too expensive" | ROI calculator, price comparison, money-back guarantee | | "Not sure it works" | Case studies, free trial, demo video | | "Too complicated" | Setup wizard, onboarding support, "get started in 5 minutes" | | "Not sure I need it" | Problem agitation, cost of inaction | | "What if I don't like it?" | Free trial, money-back guarantee, cancel anytime | | "Is my data safe?" | Security badges, compliance logos, privacy policy link | | "I need to ask my team" | Shareable comparison page, team trial, ROI one-pager |
Checklist:
- [ ] FAQ section addresses top 3-5 objections
- [ ] Risk reversals present (guarantee, free trial, cancel anytime)
- [ ] Pricing transparency (no hidden fees or surprise costs)
- [ ] Security and privacy indicators where relevant
- [ ] Comparison with alternatives (if applicable)
Section 6: Call-to-Action (Weight: 10%)
The conversion mechanism itself.
CTA Button Checklist:
- [ ] CTA text describes the VALUE, not the action ("Get My Free Report" vs "Submit")
- [ ] CTA button is visually dominant (size, color, whitespace)
- [ ] CTA appears multiple times on long pages
- [ ] Secondary CTA exists for visitors not ready to commit
- [ ] CTA has supporting microcopy (e.g., "No credit card required")
- [ ] Button text uses first person ("Start MY trial" vs "Start YOUR trial")
- [ ] CTA is specific to the offer (not generic)
CTA Copy Scoring:
- Weak: "Submit", "Click Here", "Learn More"
- Medium: "Sign Up", "Get Started", "Download Now"
- Strong: "Start My Free Trial", "Get My Custom Report", "Claim Your Discount"
Section 7: Footer and Secondary Elements (Weight: 5%)
The bottom of the page and supporting elements.
Checklist:
- [ ] Final CTA present at bottom of page
- [ ] Contact information or support options visible
- [ ] Privacy policy and terms of service linked
- [ ] Trust badges repeated near final CTA
- [ ] No competing links that lead away from conversion
- [ ] Copyright and legal information present
- [ ] Social media links (only if they support conversion, not distract)
Step 3: Copy Scoring
Score the overall page copy on 5 dimensions (1-10 each):
- Clarity - Can a visitor understand the offer in 5 seconds?
- Urgency - Is there a reason to act NOW vs later?
- Specificity - Are claims concrete with numbers, timeframes, outcomes?
- Proof - Are claims backed by evidence, data, or testimonials?
- Action Orientation - Does the copy drive toward a specific next step?
Calculate the Copy Score: average of all 5 dimensions, multiplied by 10 for a score out of 100.
Step 4: Form Optimization Audit
If the page has a form, evaluate:
| Element | Best Practice | |---|---| | Field count | Every additional field reduces conversion ~7%. Lead capture: 3-5 fields max. | | Labels | Use inline labels or floating labels. Avoid placeholder-only labels. | | Button text | Match the value proposition. "Get My Free Guide" > "Submit". | | Error handling | Inline validation. Specific error messages. Don't clear the entire form on error. | | Multi-step | Break long forms into steps with progress indicator. | | Required vs optional | Mark optional fields, not required ones. | | Auto-fill | Enable browser auto-fill for standard fields. | | Field types | Use appropriate input types (email, tel, url) for mobile keyboards. |
Step 5: Mobile Responsiveness Audit
Mobile accounts for 60%+ of web traffic. Check:
- [ ] CTA is thumb-reachable (bottom half of screen)
- [ ] Text is readable without zooming (16px minimum body text)
- [ ] Forms are usable on mobile (large tap targets, appropriate keyboards)
- [ ] Images resize properly and don't break layout
- [ ] No horizontal scrolling required
- [ ] Page loads under 3 seconds on 4G
- [ ] Click-to-call for phone numbers
- [ ] Sticky CTA bar on scroll (if applicable)
Step 6: Page Speed Impact Assessment
Reference these conversion impact benchmarks:
| Load Time | Conversion Impact | |---|---| | 0-2 seconds | Baseline (optimal) | | 2-3 seconds | -7% conversion rate | | 3-5 seconds | -20% conversion rate | | 5-8 seconds | -35% conversion rate | | 8+ seconds | -50%+ conversion rate |
Check for common speed issues:
- Unoptimized images (use WebP, lazy loading)
- Render-blocking JavaScript
- Missing browser caching
- No CDN
- Excessive third-party scripts
- Unminified CSS/JS
Step 7: Generate A/B Test Recommendations
Format each test as a hypothesis:
Template: "If we [CHANGE], then [METRIC] will [IMPROVE/INCREASE] because [REASON]."
Example tests to consider:
- Headline variations (benefit-focused vs outcome-focused)
- CTA button color and text
- Social proof placement (above vs below fold)
- Form field count (reduce by 1-2 fields)
- Hero image vs hero video
- Long-form vs short-form page
- Adding urgency elements (countdown, limited spots)
- Price anchoring and presentation
- Testimonial format (text vs video)
- Adding a chatbot or live chat widget
Step 8: Heat Map Interpretation Guidance
Even without actual heat map data, provide guidance on:
- Expected attention zones based on page layout
- F-pattern vs Z-pattern reading based on content density
- Scroll depth predictions based on page length and content breaks
- Click probability zones based on visual hierarchy
- Rage click indicators (elements that look clickable but aren't)
- Dead zones where content may be ignored
Output Format
Generate a file called LANDING-CRO.md in the project root or output directory with:
# Landing Page CRO Analysis
## [Page URL]
### Analysis Date: [date]
---
## Overall CRO Score: [X/100]
## Page Type: [identified type]
## Current Estimated Conversion Rate: [estimate based on findings]
## Target Conversion Rate: [realistic improvement target]
---
## Section-by-Section Analysis
### 1. Hero Section [Score: X/10]
**Findings:**
- [specific observations]
**Fixes (Priority: HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW):**
- [specific, actionable recommendations]
[Repeat for all 7 sections]
---
## Copy Score: [X/100]
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Clarity | X/10 | [notes] |
| Urgency | X/10 | [notes] |
| Specificity | X/10 | [notes] |
| Proof | X/10 | [notes] |
| Action Orientation | X/10 | [notes] |
---
## Form Audit
[findings and recommendations]
---
## Mobile Audit
[findings and recommendations]
---
## A/B Test Recommendations
1. [Hypothesis format test]
2. [Hypothesis format test]
3. [Hypothesis format test]
---
## Prioritized Fix List
### Quick Wins (implement this week)
1. [fix with expected impact]
### Medium-Term (implement this month)
1. [fix with expected impact]
### Strategic (implement this quarter)
1. [fix with expected impact]
---
## Before/After Wireframe Suggestions
[Text-based wireframe descriptions of current vs recommended layout]
Key Principles
- Always tie recommendations to REVENUE IMPACT. Don't just say "change the button color" -- say "changing the CTA button to a contrasting color typically increases clicks 15-30%, which at your current traffic could mean X more conversions per month."
- Prioritize fixes by effort-to-impact ratio. Quick wins first.
- Be specific. "Improve your headline" is useless. "Change your headline from 'Welcome to Our Platform' to 'Cut Your Reporting Time by 75% -- Automated Analytics for Growth Teams' because it adds specificity, a quantified benefit, and targets a specific audience" is actionable.
- Reference industry benchmarks so the client understands where they stand.
- If you have access to the page via browser tools, take screenshots and reference specific elements.
- If the user has run
/market auditpreviously, incorporate those findings into the CRO analysis for a more complete picture.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: zubair-trabzada
- Source: zubair-trabzada/ai-marketing-claude
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://www.skool.com/aiworkshop
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.