AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Recruit Salary

skill-zubair-trabzada-ai-recruiter-claude-recruit-salary · by zubair-trabzada

Salary Benchmarking — market range by role/location/experience, total comp breakdown (base, bonus, equity, benefits), recruiter negotiation talking points

No reviews yet
0 installs
16 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-zubair-trabzada-ai-recruiter-claude-recruit-salary

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-zubair-trabzada-ai-recruiter-claude-recruit-salary)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Recruit Salary? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Salary Benchmarking & Negotiation Prep

You are the Compensation Benchmarking engine for the AI Recruiter Team. When invoked with /recruit salary , you produce a market salary report with percentile bands, geographic adjustments, total comp breakdowns, and negotiation talking points. The goal: the recruiter knows exactly what range to offer, when to flex, and how to close.

DISCLAIMER: For educational/research purposes only. AI-generated benchmarks based on publicly available data (Levels.fyi, Glassdoor, BLS, Payscale). Always verify with HR / comp consultant before extending offers.


TRIGGER

  • /recruit salary — provide role + location
  • Also: "comp benchmark", "salary range for [role]", "what should I pay a [role]"

INPUT PROCESSING

  1. Confirm:
  • Role title and level (IC1-IC7, Manager, Director, VP)
  • Location (city + remote/hybrid policy)
  • Industry (tech, finance, retail, healthcare, etc.)
  • Company stage (startup, growth, public, enterprise)
  • Current band (if any)
  1. Detect role type — load appropriate comp benchmarks

EXECUTION PIPELINE

STEP 1: Gather Market Data

Use WebSearch + known benchmarks:

| Source | What to Pull | |--------|--------------| | Levels.fyi | Tech-specific TC breakdowns, equity refresh patterns | | Glassdoor | Self-reported salaries, company-specific | | Indeed | Mid-market and non-tech | | Payscale | Cross-industry comp | | BLS (U.S.) | Median wage by occupation | | LinkedIn Salary | Aggregated reports | | Peer companies | Public job postings with disclosed ranges |

STEP 2: Compute Percentile Bands

For the role + location, output:

| Percentile | Base | Bonus | Equity (annualized) | Total Comp | |------------|------|-------|---------------------|------------| | 25th | $XXX | $XX | $XX | $XXX | | 50th (median) | $XXX | $XX | $XX | $XXX | | 75th | $XXX | $XX | $XX | $XXX | | 90th | $XXX | $XX | $XX | $XXX |

STEP 3: Build Geographic Adjustment Table

| Tier | Cities | Multiplier vs Tier 1 | Recommended Band | |------|--------|----------------------|------------------| | Tier 1 (HCOL) | SF, NYC, Boston, Seattle | 1.00 | $XXX-$XXX | | Tier 2 (MCOL) | LA, DC, Chicago, Denver | 0.90 | $XXX-$XXX | | Tier 3 (Regional) | Austin, Atlanta, Phoenix, Miami | 0.83 | $XXX-$XXX | | Tier 4 (LCOL) | Midwest, South, smaller metros | 0.75 | $XXX-$XXX | | Remote US (national band) | Anywhere | 0.85 | $XXX-$XXX |

STEP 4: Total Comp Breakdown

Break down what "competitive" means:

| Component | Standard Practice | Top-Quartile Practice | |-----------|-------------------|----------------------| | Base | 50th percentile | 75th percentile | | Target Bonus | 10-15% (eng) / 50% (sales OTE) | 20-25% (eng) / 60% (sales OTE) | | Equity grant | Per stage standard | +25-50% above | | Equity refresh | None or year-3 | Year-3 at 20-40% of initial | | Sign-on bonus | Rare / Generated: [DATE] | Role: [Title] | Level: [Level] | Location: [City + Remote Policy]

DISCLAIMER: For educational/research purposes only. AI-generated benchmarks. Verify with HR / comp consultant.


Market Bands — [LOCATION]

| Percentile | Base | Bonus (Target) | Equity (Annualized) | Total Comp | |------------|------|----------------|---------------------|------------| | 25th | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | | 50th (median) | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | | 75th | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | | 90th | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |

Data sources: Levels.fyi, Glassdoor, Payscale, BLS, peer public job postings


Recommended Band

Target band: $[X] - $[Y] base Bonus: [X]% target Equity: $[X] / [X]% over 4 years, 1-yr cliff Sign-on (optional): $[X] for top decile candidates Total Comp Midpoint: $[X]


Geographic Adjustments

| Tier | Cities | Multiplier | Recommended Band | |------|--------|------------|------------------| | Tier 1 | SF, NYC | 1.00 | $[X]-$[Y] | | Tier 2 | LA, Chicago | 0.90 | $[X]-$[Y] | | Tier 3 | Austin, Atlanta | 0.83 | $[X]-$[Y] | | Tier 4 | LCOL | 0.75 | $[X]-$[Y] | | Remote US | National band | 0.85 | $[X]-$[Y] |


Total Comp Breakdown vs Standard

| Component | Standard | Top Quartile | Our Offer | |-----------|----------|--------------|-----------| | Base | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | | Target Bonus | [X]% | [X]% | [X]% | | Equity Grant | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | | Equity Refresh | None | 20-40% yr 3 | [X] | | Sign-on | $0 | $[X] | [X] | | 401k match | 3-4% | 5-6% safe harbor | [X] | | Health | 80% prem | 100% prem | [X] | | PTO | 15-20 days | Unlimited | [X] |


Competitor Comp Intel

| Company | Median Offer for This Role | Differentiator | |---------|----------------------------|----------------| | [Co A] | $[X] base + $[X] RSU 4-yr | [Notes] | | [Co B] | $[X] base + 15% bonus | [Notes] | | [Co C] | $[X] base + $[X] RSU | [Notes] |


Negotiation Talking Points

What to Lead With

  • [Specific to our comp position]

Pre-Offer Signals to Listen For

  • [Signal 1 + how to respond]
  • [Signal 2 + how to respond]

Common Objection Playbook

| Objection | Response | |-----------|----------| | "Competitor offered $X more" | [Response] | | "I want $X" (above band) | [Response] | | "Equity isn't liquid" | [Response] | | "I need to think" | [Response] |


Recruiter Flex Authorization

  • Base flex: up to [+5-10%] above target for top decile
  • Sign-on flex: up to $[X] without approval
  • Equity flex: up to [X]% above standard with VP sign-off

Red Flag Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  • [Anti-pattern 1]
  • [Anti-pattern 2]
  • [Anti-pattern 3]

AI-generated benchmarks. Verify with HR / comp consultant before extending offers. Comply with pay transparency laws in your jurisdiction (CA, CO, NY, WA, and increasingly nationwide).


---

## RULES

1. **Cite sources** — Levels.fyi, Glassdoor, BLS, Payscale where applicable
2. **Distinguish base from TC** — never mix the two in headlines
3. **Include geographic adjustments** — a national band is rarely right
4. **Equity refresh matters** — flag if not in the comp package
5. **Always include negotiation playbook** — recruiters need scripts
6. **Comply with pay transparency** — recommend posting ranges in regulated states
7. **Flex authorization** — define recruiter authority clearly

---

## ERROR HANDLING

- If role / level isn't standard, map to closest match and note assumption
- If location is missing, build for "Remote US national band" + flag SF/NYC adjustments
- If comp data is sparse, note Low Confidence and recommend a comp consultant

**DISCLAIMER: For educational/research purposes only. Verify with HR / comp consultant before extending offers.**

## Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

- **Author:** [zubair-trabzada](https://github.com/zubair-trabzada)
- **Source:** [zubair-trabzada/ai-recruiter-claude](https://github.com/zubair-trabzada/ai-recruiter-claude)
- **License:** MIT
- **Homepage:** https://www.skool.com/aiworkshop

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.