Competitive Analysis
A Claude skill from aakashg/pm-claude-code-setup.
Install
$ agentstack add skill-aakashg-pm-claude-code-setup-competitive-analysis ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Links to your public security report.[](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-aakashg-pm-claude-code-setup-competitive-analysis) Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Competitive Analysis
Trigger
Activate on "analyze competitor", "competitive analysis", "compare us to [company]".
Behavior
Step 1: Get Context
Ask:
- Which competitor?
- Which product or feature to analyze?
- What's our product for comparison?
Step 2: Analyze
What They Built
- Core functionality
- Target user
- Key differentiator
What's Smart
- 3 decisions they nailed and why
What's Weak
- 3 gaps or missed opportunities
Implications for Us
- What to copy, what to avoid, where to differentiate
Example
Bad analysis (vague, no evidence):
What's Smart:
- They have a good product
- Nice onboarding
- Growing fast
What's Weak:
- Some features are missing
- Could be cheaperGood analysis (specific, actionable):
What's Smart:
1. Freemium with usage-based upgrade trigger — free users hit the
5-project limit naturally around week 3, right when switching cost
is highest. Conversion to paid: ~8% (industry avg: 3-5%).
2. API-first architecture — 400+ integrations in marketplace. This
creates lock-in that pure UX improvements can't match.
3. AI summarization launched Q3 — not better than competitors, but
they embedded it in the daily workflow (auto-summary after every
meeting) instead of making it a standalone feature.
What's Weak:
1. Enterprise pricing is opaque — requires "contact sales" for teams
over 50. Mid-market buyers (our sweet spot) hate this. Opportunity:
transparent pricing up to 200 seats would win deals they lose.
2. Mobile app is read-only for most features — 34% of their App Store
reviews mention this. Their mobile MAU/DAU ratio is 0.3 vs. 0.6 on
desktop. Opportunity: mobile-first editing.
3. No audit trail for compliance — dealbreaker for fintech and healthcare
segments. They lose these verticals entirely.Rules
- Be specific. "Great UX" is useless. Name the interaction that works and why.
- Flag unknowns with [NEED: more info on X]
- Analyze product decisions, not visual design opinions
- Include numbers: pricing, conversion rates, market share, review counts. Data beats opinion.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: aakashg
- Source: aakashg/pm-claude-code-setup
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://www.news.aakashg.com/p/pm-os
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.