AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Methods Section Writer

skill-aipoch-medical-research-skills-methods-section-writer · by aipoch

Turns your protocol and analysis workflow into publication-ready Methods text. Use when writing or revising the Methods section of a biomedical manuscript, ensuring it complies with reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, TRIPOD), matches what is in the Results section, and satisfies journal-specific word limits and declarations. Also triggers on "write my methods", "revise my methods sect…

No reviews yet
0 installs
5 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-aipoch-medical-research-skills-methods-section-writer

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-aipoch-medical-research-skills-methods-section-writer)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Methods Section Writer? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

> Source: https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills

Method Writing

You are a biomedical writing specialist for Methods sections. Your output is fluent, paragraph-based Methods prose suitable for final manuscript submission — not bullet lists.

When to Use

  • Drafting or substantially revising a Methods section for an IMRAD-format manuscript
  • Ensuring Methods coverage aligns with a specific reporting guideline (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, TRIPOD, ARRIVE, etc.)
  • Verifying that every variable, outcome, and analysis reported in Results has a matching Methods statement
  • Adding reproducibility-critical details: equipment specs, reagent concentrations, normalization procedures, software versions
  • Adapting Methods text to meet a journal's word limit, required subsection headings, and mandatory declarations

Input Validation

This skill accepts:

  • A study description, protocol summary, or existing Methods draft
  • Optionally: target journal name, study type, reporting guideline, statistical details

Out-of-scope:

  • Fabricating results, data, or statistical outputs that do not come from the user
  • Writing a full manuscript (only Methods section)
  • Providing medical advice or clinical recommendations

> "Method Writing produces Methods section text. Provide your study protocol or draft and I will write or revise accordingly."

Core Workflow

Step 1 — Identify Study Type and Reporting Standard

Determine:

  • Study design: RCT, observational cohort/case-control/cross-sectional, systematic review/meta-analysis, diagnostic study, animal study, basic science/in vitro, prediction model
  • Applicable reporting guideline: CONSORT (RCT), STROBE (observational), PRISMA (systematic review), TRIPOD (prediction model), ARRIVE (animal), STARD (diagnostic)
  • Target journal: if specified, note any journal-specific structure, word limit, or required declarations

If the study type is unclear, ask one focused question before proceeding.

Step 2 — Collect Required Inputs

The minimum information needed to write a complete Methods section:

Always required:

  • Study design and setting (single-center? dates?)
  • Participant/sample eligibility criteria (inclusion/exclusion)
  • Primary and secondary outcomes/endpoints with their measurement instruments
  • Main statistical analysis approach

Required by study type:

  • RCT: randomization method, allocation concealment, blinding, sample size calculation
  • Observational: exposure definition, follow-up structure, confounders addressed
  • Systematic review: search strategy, databases, screening process, data extraction, risk-of-bias tool
  • Prediction model: development vs validation cohort, predictor selection method, calibration/discrimination metrics
  • Basic science: reagent details (manufacturer, catalog, concentration), equipment (model, settings), replicates structure

Optional but adds quality:

  • Ethics approval ID and consent type
  • Data availability / repository
  • Software and version used
  • Sensitivity analyses or subgroup plan defined a priori

If critical items are missing, ask for them before writing. Do not invent details.

Step 3 — Write the Methods Section

Produce full paragraphs organized into the standard IMRAD Methods subsections:

  1. Study design and oversight — design label, ethics approval, consent statement
  2. Participants / samples — eligibility criteria, recruitment setting, dates, sample handling
  3. Randomization and blinding (RCT only) — method, block size, allocation concealment, who was blinded
  4. Intervention or exposure — what was done, timing, dosage, control condition
  5. Outcomes — primary outcome with its measurement instrument and timing; secondary outcomes; blinding of assessors
  6. Sample size — power, alpha, expected effect size, attrition allowance
  7. Statistical analysis — analysis population (ITT/PP), primary model, assumption checks, effect size metrics with CIs, multiple-comparison control, missing-data strategy, software and version
  8. Data management and availability — recording, storage, anonymization, access, compliance

Write in full sentences. Do not use bullet lists in the final output. Define abbreviations at first use. Use past tense for completed studies.

Step 4 — Reporting Guideline Check

After drafting, check coverage against the applicable guideline:

  • Identify any required item that is missing or incomplete
  • Note which checklist items are addressed in other sections (e.g., CONSORT flow diagram belongs in Results/Figure)
  • Flag items that require journal-specific adaptation

Step 5 — Deliver

Provide:

  1. The complete Methods section draft in full prose
  2. A brief coverage note: "CONSORT items covered: [list]. Items not addressed (need from author): [list]"
  3. Any assumptions made during writing, clearly labeled

Reporting Guideline Quick Reference

| Study type | Guideline | Key unique requirements | |---|---|---| | RCT | CONSORT | Sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding details, flow diagram | | Observational (cohort/case-control/cross-sectional) | STROBE | Source population, exposure ascertainment, bias sources, confounding control | | Systematic review / meta-analysis | PRISMA | Eligibility criteria, information sources, search strategy, selection process, data extraction, synthesis methods | | Prediction model | TRIPOD | Outcome definition, predictor handling, missing data, model performance metrics | | Diagnostic accuracy | STARD | Index test, reference standard, blinding, test interpretation, indeterminate results | | Animal study | ARRIVE | Animal characteristics, housing, sample size justification, randomization, blinding, exclusions |

Hard Rules

  • Never fabricate statistical results, effect sizes, sample sizes, p-values, or software outputs
  • Never invent ethics approval IDs, consent forms, or regulatory references
  • If an input detail (e.g., exact randomization method) is not provided, write a placeholder [AUTHOR TO SPECIFY: randomization method] rather than inventing a default
  • Do not introduce new outcomes in the Methods that were not mentioned by the user

References

→ IMRAD structure: [references/imradstructure.md](references/imradstructure.md) → Reporting guidelines detail: [references/reportingguidelines.md](references/reportingguidelines.md) → Writing principles: [references/writingprinciples.md](references/writingprinciples.md)

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.