AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Algo Price Van Westendorp

skill-asgard-ai-platform-skills-algo-price-van-westendorp · by asgard-ai-platform

Conduct Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter analysis to identify acceptable price ranges. Use this skill when the user needs to determine price boundaries for a new product, find the optimal and indifference price points, or survey-based pricing research — even if they say 'what should we charge', 'price sensitivity survey', or 'acceptable price range'.

No reviews yet
0 installs
22 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-asgard-ai-platform-skills-algo-price-van-westendorp

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-asgard-ai-platform-skills-algo-price-van-westendorp)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Algo Price Van Westendorp? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter

Overview

Van Westendorp PSM uses four price perception questions to identify an acceptable price range through intersection analysis. Produces: Point of Marginal Cheapness (PMC), Point of Marginal Expensiveness (PME), Indifference Price Point (IPP), and Optimal Price Point (OPP). Requires survey data from 100+ respondents.

When to Use

Trigger conditions:

  • Setting initial price for a new product or service
  • Identifying the acceptable price range from consumer perception
  • Quick pricing research without complex experimental design

When NOT to use:

  • When you need to measure attribute trade-offs (use conjoint analysis)
  • When you need demand curve estimation (use price elasticity)

Algorithm

IRON LAW: Van Westendorp Identifies an ACCEPTABLE Range, Not Optimal Price
It doesn't account for competition, costs, or willingness to pay at
scale. It tells you WHERE prices are perceived as reasonable, not
what maximizes revenue. Use as input to pricing strategy, not as the
final answer.

Phase 1: Input Validation

Survey 100+ target customers with four questions at various price points:

  1. Too cheap (quality suspect)? 2. A bargain (great deal)? 3. Getting expensive (but would consider)? 4. Too expensive (would not buy)?

Gate: 100+ responses, all four curves plottable.

Phase 2: Core Algorithm

  1. For each price point, compute cumulative percentages for each question
  2. Plot four curves: "too cheap" (descending), "cheap/bargain" (descending), "expensive" (ascending), "too expensive" (ascending)
  3. Find intersections:
  • OPP = intersection of "too cheap" and "too expensive" (optimal price point)
  • IPP = intersection of "cheap" and "expensive" (indifference price point)
  • PMC = intersection of "too cheap" and "expensive" (marginal cheapness)
  • PME = intersection of "cheap" and "too expensive" (marginal expensiveness)
  1. Acceptable range = [PMC, PME]

Phase 3: Verification

Check: PMC < OPP < IPP < PME (expected ordering). All intersections exist within surveyed range. Gate: Four-point ordering is logical, range is commercially viable.

Phase 4: Output

Return price points and acceptable range.

Output Format

{
  "price_points": {"opp": 299, "ipp": 349, "pmc": 199, "pme": 449},
  "acceptable_range": {"min": 199, "max": 449},
  "metadata": {"respondents": 250, "currency": "TWD", "product": "..."}
}

Examples

Sample I/O

Input: 200 survey responses for a SaaS product, price range tested: $5-$50/month Expected: PMC=$12, OPP=$18, IPP=$22, PME=$35. Acceptable range: $12-$35.

Edge Cases

| Input | Expected | Why | |-------|----------|-----| | Curves don't intersect | Extend surveyed range | Price points tested were too narrow | | IPP < OPP | Unusual but possible | Check data quality, may indicate confused respondents | | Very wide range | Low price sensitivity | Product category has high tolerance |

Gotchas

  • Hypothetical bias: People say they'd pay more than they actually would. Van Westendorp systematically overestimates willingness to pay.
  • No competitive context: Respondents answer in isolation. Real purchase decisions consider alternatives. Supplement with competitive analysis.
  • Sample representativeness: Results are only valid for the surveyed population. B2B vs B2C, early adopters vs mainstream — all give different ranges.
  • Newton-Miller-Smith extension: Add purchase intent questions at OPP and IPP for more actionable revenue estimates. Standard Van Westendorp alone lacks this.
  • Product must be understood: Respondents need to understand what they're pricing. For novel products, include a clear concept description.

References

  • For Newton-Miller-Smith purchase intent extension, see references/nms-extension.md
  • For survey design best practices, see references/survey-design.md

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.