Install
$ agentstack add skill-brycewang-stanford-aer-skills-aer-submission ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
AER Submission
Overview
The final submission audit catches the formatting and routing mistakes that produce avoidable desk rejections. AER's editorial office returns submissions for non-compliance with length, format, or policy requirements before the editor sees the paper — a turnaround that can cost weeks.
This skill is the last gate.
When to Use
- Within 48 hours of submission
- After every R&R, before resubmission
- When the user is undecided between AER and AER: Insights as the final target
- After a rejection elsewhere, when routing into the AEA family
Hard Format Constraints
| Item | AER | AER: Insights | |-------------------------------|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------| | Abstract length | ≤ 100 words | ≤ 100 words | | Main text length | ~40 pages (11-pt, 1.5-spaced, 1" margins) | ≤ 7,000 words minus 200 per exhibit; ≤ 6,000 with five exhibits | | Maximum exhibits | No formal cap | 5; each exhibit reduces budget by 200 words | | Word-count basis | Page guideline includes figures, tables, references, and in-paper appendices | Main body, footnotes, endnotes, and in-paper appendices; excludes references, exhibits, and Supplemental Appendix | | File format | Single PDF for review | Single PDF for review | | Separate title page | None — title and byline on page 1 | Same | | Cover letter | Optional | Optional | | Submission system | ScholarOne (mc.manuscriptcentral.com/aer) | ScholarOne |
Manuscripts exceeding AER: Insights length are returned without review. This is enforced automatically.
Length Audit (AER)
The 40-page guideline counts:
- Main text
- Footnotes
- In-paper tables and figures
- References
- In-paper appendix
The 40-page count does not include: title, abstract, supplemental appendix, online appendix.
If over 40 pages: cut, then cut again, then move material to the online appendix. AER editors explicitly state that excessive online-appendix reliance is itself a desk-rejection signal. The supplemental appendix is for additional material, not for the main result.
Length Audit (AER: Insights)
Count main-body words including footnotes, endnotes, and in-paper appendices; exclude title, byline, abstract, acknowledgement footnote, references, exhibits, and Supplemental Appendix. Word-count discipline:
- One exhibit costs ~200 words
- Five exhibits leave 6,000 words
- Zero exhibits leave 7,000 words
If you cannot fit, the paper is an AER (or AEJ) paper, not an AER: Insights paper.
Manuscript Structure
[Title]
[Authors and affiliations]
[Abstract — ≤ 100 words]
[JEL codes]
[Keywords]
[Introductory paragraphs — NO heading "Introduction"]
\section{Data} (or whatever the next titled section is)
\section{...}
...
\section{Conclusion}
\bibliography{...}
[Tables in numerical order]
[Figures in numerical order]
\appendix
\section{...} (in-paper appendix only — short)
AER numbers sections with Roman numerals (I., II., III.) and subsections with capital letters (A., B., C.); the introduction is unnumbered. In LaTeX, set \renewcommand{\thesection}{\Roman{section}} or use the AEA sample article class, which applies house style automatically.
Move long appendices to a separate Supplemental Appendix file.
File Package for ScholarOne
Prepare in advance:
- Manuscript PDF — single file: text + references + tables + figures + in-paper appendix
- Supplemental Appendix PDF — optional, separate file
- Cover letter — only if needed (see below); via form field, not separate document
- JEL classification codes — primary and secondary
- Disclosure Statement PDFs — one separate PDF per coauthor; if nothing to disclose, say that explicitly
- Coeditor conflict disclosures — list any coeditor who has a personal or professional conflict
- Suggested editor — optional, in form field
- AI usage disclosure — required if AI software was used in drafting or editing; brief description
If the paper has supplementary materials (videos, large datasets), provide URLs to a public repository.
Cover Letter — When and How
AER does not require a cover letter. Use one only to communicate substantive information:
- Conflict of interest with a coeditor (e.g., recent coauthor, advisor, family member). Identify by name.
- Data access limitations that the editor needs to know in advance (e.g., restricted data with specific replication arrangements).
- Previous submission history to another AEA journal if relevant.
If you include one, keep it ≤ 200 words and submit via the ScholarOne form field, not as a separate uploaded document.
Do not use the cover letter to:
- Pitch the paper's contribution (the abstract does that)
- List the seminars where the paper was presented (the title-page footnote does that)
- Argue against potential referees (this is counterproductive)
Routing Decision: AER vs. AER: Insights vs. AEJ
Run this decision tree before submission:
Is the contribution sharp enough to fit the AER: Insights word/exhibit formula?
├── Yes → Is it cross-subfield interest?
│ ├── Yes → AER: Insights
│ └── No → AEJ: Applied / Policy / Macro / Micro (by subfield)
└── No → Does it have broad cross-subfield interest?
├── Yes → AER
└── No → AEJ (most fitting)
Common mistakes:
- Submitting a long-form paper to Insights "in case." Insights requires brevity by design, not by truncation.
- Submitting to AER when the contribution is solidly within one subfield. AEJ acceptance is faster, cheaper, and similar in audience for many topics.
- Treating the AEJ family as a fallback after AER rejection. The clock resets; conditional probability of acceptance is unchanged. Submit where the paper actually fits.
Submission Fees
AER charges a submission fee that scales with AEA membership status and country income group. Authors from low- and middle-income countries pay reduced or waived fees. Verify current fee schedule on the AEA submissions page before the corresponding author finalizes the form.
Final Preflight Checklist
- [ ]
aer-consistencyaudit reports all-pass on the final PDF's source - [ ]
aer-referee-simverdict is at least major R&R on a fresh run - [ ] Abstract ≤ 100 words (run a word count, not a glance)
- [ ] Main text within length limit (≤ 40 pages for AER; word-count for Insights)
- [ ] No "Introduction" heading; introductory material starts on page 1 after title
- [ ] All tables use booktabs rules; captions positioned correctly
- [ ] All figures are vector (PDF / EPS); each has a notes block
- [ ] References complete; in-text citations match bibliography
- [ ] JEL codes selected (primary + secondary)
- [ ] Disclosure Statement PDF prepared for each coauthor
- [ ] Coeditor conflicts disclosed
- [ ] AI usage disclosed if applicable
- [ ] Replication package deposit started (not required at submission but plan it now)
- [ ] If field experiment: AEA RCT Registry entry exists and is referenced
- [ ] Author contributions and acknowledgements present in the title-page footnote
- [ ] No tracked changes, no comments, no draft watermarks in the PDF
- [ ] Single self-contained PDF; supplemental appendix as separate file
- [ ] Corresponding author email and ORCID up to date
Repository Resources
When working from the AER-skills repository or plugin bundle, load only the relevant resource:
- Submission no-go checklist:
docs/desk-rejection-audit.md - Current policy source register:
docs/source-register.md - Replication planning surface:
skills/aer-replication/SKILL.md - Deposit-ready scaffold:
examples/replication-package-skeleton/
After Submission
- Expect 8-12 weeks to first decision for AER (median); shorter for Insights
- Desk rejection: typically within 2-4 weeks
- A "reject and resubmit" (rare) signals interest but requires substantial restructuring
- Track via ScholarOne; do not email the editorial office for status before 12 weeks
Handoff
TARGET VENUE:
LENGTH AUDIT:
FORMAT AUDIT:
COVER LETTER: words>
DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS:
CONFLICTS DISCLOSED:
REPLICATION DEPOSIT STATUS:
READY TO SUBMIT:
NEXT SKILL:
Anti-Patterns
- Submitting a manuscript whose abstract is 108 words "but should be fine"
- Including a 600-word cover letter that pitches the paper
- Uploading the LaTeX source as the review PDF
- Listing JEL codes that do not match the paper's content
- Submitting an Insights paper at 7,800 words because it has only two exhibits — the formula gives ≤ 6,600
- Holding the replication deposit until "after acceptance" — the Data Editor delay is now part of the publication timeline
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: brycewang-stanford
- Source: brycewang-stanford/AER-Skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.