skill-cdeust-zetetic-team-subagents-evidence-synthesis · by Install
$ agentstack add skill-cdeust-zetetic-team-subagents-evidence-synthesis ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Links to your public security report.[](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-cdeust-zetetic-team-subagents-evidence-synthesis) Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Evidence Synthesis
Problem shape: multiple sources (papers, benchmarks, interviews, texts) must be combined into one graded conclusion — and the current draft cherry-picks, skips heterogeneity, or has no explicit warrant connecting evidence to claim.
Relevant geniuses
| Agent | Use when | |---|---| | [cochrane](../../agents/genius/cochrane.md) | studies must be systematically found, graded, and pooled; publication bias suspected; effect sizes needed, not vote-counting | | [toulmin](../../agents/genius/toulmin.md) | an argument needs explicit claim-evidence-warrant structure with qualifiers and rebuttals; standards differ by field | | [feynman](../../agents/genius/feynman.md) | a result is suspiciously clean; a citation is used without the ability to rederive it; integrity audit before publishing | | [darwin](../../agents/genius/darwin.md) | evidence accumulates over a long horizon; the theory needs a difficulty book of its own contradictions; hardest case first | | [laplace](../../agents/genius/laplace.md) | evidence must update a belief quantitatively — priors, likelihoods, calibration | | [gadamer](../../agents/genius/gadamer.md) | sources must be interpreted, not just counted — pre-understandings audited, the charitable reading found first | | [strauss](../../agents/genius/strauss.md) | qualitative data (interviews, tickets, reviews) needs open/axial coding until saturation, not anecdote-picking | | [geertz](../../agents/genius/geertz.md) | the evidence is behavior in context — thick description and emic vs etic separation before conclusions |
Invocation
- Pick the best-fit agent above. If two or more fit, run
tools/genius-invoker.sh route "" and take the top ranked match.
- Load it:
tools/genius-invoker.sh invoke "", then read
agents/genius/.md in full.
- Apply the agent's `` step by step and answer in its
``. Every synthesized claim carries its evidence grade and its strongest known counter-evidence (coding-standards §8: no source, no claim).
- Typical chain: cochrane grades the corpus → toulmin structures the argument
→ feynman audits the integrity. Run via tools/genius-invoker.sh compose cochrane toulmin -- "".
- If no shape above matches, use a standard team agent instead.
Refuse when
- The conclusion is fixed in advance and only supporting sources are wanted.
- Primary sources are unavailable and only summaries-of-summaries exist —
say "I don't know" rather than synthesize hearsay.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: cdeust
- Source: cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://ai-architect.tools
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.